Effects of Pretask Modeling on Attention to Form and Question Development

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 8-35

  Kim, Youjin ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873645249     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.52     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29-51). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2. Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Bowles, M. (in press). Task-based interactions of L2-heritage learner pairs in Spanish language classrooms. Modern Language Journal.
4. Bowles, M., & Leow, R. P. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 415-440. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050187
5. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow, England: Longman.
6. Crookes, G. (1988). Planning, monitoring, and second language development: A review [Technical Report No. 4]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Center for Second Language Classroom Research.
7. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
9. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-441. doi:10.2307/3588029
10. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015047
11. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247. doi:10.1177/136216889900300303
12. Fujii, A., & Mackey, A. (2009). Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 267-301. doi:10.1515/iral.2009.012
13. García Mayo, M. P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 156-175. doi:10.1111/1473-4192.t01-1-00029
14. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on corrective feedback and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction. System, 29, 267-287.
16. Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction, and protocol analysis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 354-376). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
18. Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114-130. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x
19. Kim, Y. (in press). Task complexity, learning opportunities and Korean EFL learners' question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
20. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211-234. doi:10.1177/1362168810388711
21. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15, 1-17.
22. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 485-507. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00157
23. Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
24. Leow, R. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35-57. doi:10.1017/S0272263104026129
25. Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361-378). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
27. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
28. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
29. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407-452). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30. McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207-224. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
31. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103. doi:10.1017/S0272263105050047
32. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x
33. McDonough, K., & Sunitham, W. (2009). Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 231-254. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00166.x
34. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.
35. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology. (2005). Young-uh-gua su-jun-byul hak-sup-ja-ryo [1st grade]. Cheon-nam, South Korea: Kwang-shin-jung-bo-chul-pan-sa.
36. Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11-37.
37. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
38. Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77-109). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
39. Park, S. (2010). The influence of pretask instructions and pretask planning on focus on form during Korean EFL task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 9-26. doi:10.1177/1362168809346491
40. Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children's task-based interactions. System, 34, 547-565. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.08.004
41. Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.
42. Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189-207. doi:10.1177/1362168807074604
43. Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 53-77). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Sachs, R., & Suh, B. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 197-227). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
45. Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111-141). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
46. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (in press). Corrective feedback and peer interaction for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
47. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-212. doi:10.1177/136216889700100302
48. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193-218). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
50. Slimani, A. (1991). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In J. C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197-220). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224. doi:10.1017/S0272263100011967
52. Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29-53. doi:10.1177/136216880100500103
53. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00179
54. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
56. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp. 99-118). Harlow, England: Longman.
57. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303-346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00020.x
58. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7
59. Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pretask planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27. doi:10.1093/applin/24.1.1