The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 114-130

  Kim, Youjin ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41949142404     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, R. (in press). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Garcia, P., & Asención, Y. (2001). Interlanguage development of Spanish learners: Comprehension, production, and interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 377-401.
3. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539-558.
5. Jeon, K. S. (in press). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Interactional feedback and second language acquisition: Empirical research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 343-358.
8. LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
9. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 485-507.
10. Lee, I., & Ramey, S. R. (2000). The Korean language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11. Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
12. McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207-224.
13. National Institute of the Korean Language. (2002). Distribution of speech parts of Korean, 2002 [Data file]. Available from the National Institute of the Korean Language Web site, http://www.korean.go.kr/ nkview/dw02.html
14. Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1993). The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 9-29.
15. Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ross-Feldman, L. (in press). Interaction in the classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Storch, N. (1998). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52, 291-300.
19. Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27, 363-374.
20. Storch, N. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 457-480.
21. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. Swain, M. (1993). Second language testing and second language acquisition: Is there a conflict with traditional psychometrics? Language Testing, 10, 193-207.
23. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.
27. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
28. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251-274.
29. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99-118). New York: Longman.
30. Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (in press). Riddles and puns in the ESL classroom: Adults talk to learn In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121-142.
33. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth vs. breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13-39.
34. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303-346.
35. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.