Quantitative 1H-NMR-Metabolomics Reveals Extensive Metabolic Reprogramming and the Effect of the Aquaglyceroporin FPS1 in Ethanol-Stressed Yeast Cells

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Lourenço, Artur B ^a   Roque, Filipa C ^a   Teixeira, Miguel C ^a   Ascenso, José R ^b   Sá Correia, Isabel ^a  

^a Instituto de Biotecnologia e Bioengenharia Lisboa   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; ALCOHOL; AMINO ACID; AQUAGLYCEROPORIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; CITRIC ACID; FUMARIC ACID; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTATHIONE; GLYCEROL; HISTIDINE; LEUCINE; MALIC ACID; METHIONINE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; PORIN; PYRUVIC ACID; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; SUCCINIC ACID; TREHALOSE; TRICARBOXYLIC ACID; VALINE; FPS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL METABOLISM; CELL STRESS; CITRIC ACID CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DIFFUSION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION STATE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; YEAST CELL; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

ETHANOL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; METABOLOMICS; PROTONS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84873621089     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055439     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JP, Powell CD, Smart KA, (2007) Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 31: 535-569.
2. Stanley D, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA, Borneman A, Fraser S, (2010) Transcriptional changes associated with ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 88: 231-239.
3. van Uden N, (1985) Ethanol toxicity and ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes 8: 11-58.
4. Gawel R, Francis L, Waters EJ, (2007) Statistical correlations between the in-mouth textural characteristics and the chemical composition of Shiraz wines. Journal of Agriculture Food and Chemistry 55: 2683-2687.
5. Gawel R, van Sluyter S, Waters EJ, (2007) The effects of ethanol and glycerol on the body and other sensory characteristics of Riesling wines. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 13: 38-45.
6. Kutyna DR, Varela C, JHenschke PA, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA, (2010) Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends in Food Science & Technology 21: 293-302.
7. Salgueiro SP, Sá-Correia I, Novais JM, (1988) Ethanol-Induced Leakage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetics and Relationship to Yeast Ethanol Tolerance and Alcohol Fermentation Productivity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54: 903-909.
8. Rosa MF, Sá-Correia I, (1996) Intracellular acidification does not account for inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth in the presence of ethanol. FEMS Microbiology Letters 135: 271-274.
9. Hu XH, Wang MH, Tan T, Li JR, Yang H, et al. (2007) Genetic Dissection of Ethanol Tolerance in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 175: 1479-1487.
10. Casey GP, Ingledew WM, (1986) Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 13: 219-280.
11. Aguilera F, Peinado RA, Millan C, Ortega JM, Mauricio JC, (2006) Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+-ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains. Internation Journal of Food Microbiology 110: 34-42.
12. Monteiro GA, Sá-Correia I, (1998) In vivo activation of yeast plasma membrane H+-ATPase by ethanol: effect on the kinetic parameters and involvement of the carboxyl-terminus regulatory domain. Biochim Biophys Acta 1370: 310-316.
13. Rosa MF, Sá-Correia I, (1991) In vivo activation by ethanol of plasma membrane ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 830-835.
14. Chi Z, Arneborg N, (1999) Relationship between lipid composition, frequency of ethanol-induced respiratory deficient mutants, and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 86: 1047-1052.
15. Ogawa Y, Nitta A, Uchiyama H, Imamura T, Shimoi H, et al. (2000) Tolerance mechanism of the ethanol-tolerant mutant of sake yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 90: 313-320.
16. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenco AB, Sá-Correia I, (2009) Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 5761-5772.
17. Teixeira MC, Godinho CP, Cabrito TR, Mira NP, Sá-Correia I, (2012) Increased expression of the yeast multidrug resistance ABC transporter Pdr18 leads to increased ethanol tolerance and ethanol production in high gravity alcoholic fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 11: 98.
18. Cabrito TR, Teixeira MC, Singh A, Prasad R, Sá-Correia I, (2011) The yeast ABC transporter Pdr18 (ORF YNR070w) controls plasma membrane sterol composition, playing a role in multidrug resistance. Biochem J 440: 195-202.
19. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y, Iwahashi H, (2004) Comprehensive gene expression analysis of the response to straight-chain alcohols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using cDNA microarray. J Appl Microbiol 97: 57-67.
20. Chandler M, Stanley GA, Rogers P, Chambers P, (2004) A genomic approach to defining the ethanol stress response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annals of Microbiology 54: 427-454.
21. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin B, (2001) Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 498: 98-103.
22. Stanley D, Bandara A, Fraser S, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA, (2010) The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 109: 13-24.
23. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y, Iwahashi H, (2006) The genome-wide screening of yeast deletion mutants to identify the genes required for tolerance to ethanol and other alcohols. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 744-750.
24. Kubota S, Takeo I, Kume K, Kanai M, Shitamukai A, et al. (2004) Effect of ethanol on cell growth of budding yeast: genes that are important for cell growth in the presence of ethanol. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68: 968-972.
25. van Voorst F, Houghton-Larsen J, Jonson L, Kielland-Brandt MC, Brandt A, (2006) Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 23: 351-359.
26. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Furusawa C, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, et al. (2009) Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 32-44.
27. Swinnen S, Schaerlaekens K, Pais T, Claesen J, Hubmann G, et al. (2012) Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Research 22: 975-984.
28. Támas MJ, Luyten K, Sutherland FC, Hernandez A, Albertyn J, et al. (1999) Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol Microbiol 31: 1087-1104.
29. Hohmann S, (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 300-372.
30. Wysocki R, Chery CC, Wawrzycka D, Van Hulle M, Cornelis R, et al. (2001) The glycerol channel Fps1p mediates the uptake of arsenite and antimonite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 40: 1391-1401.
31. Mollapour M, Piper PW, (2007) Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6446-6456.
32. Nozawa A, Takano J, Kobayashi M, von Wiren N, Fujiwara T, (2006) Roles of BOR1, DUR3, and FPS1 in boron transport and tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262: 216-222.
33. Toh TH, Kayingo G, van der Merwe MJ, Kilian SG, Hallsworth JE, et al. (2001) Implications of FPS1 deletion and membrane ergosterol content for glycerol efflux from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 1: 205-211.
34. Ding MZ, Li BZ, Cheng JS, Yuan YJ, (2010) Metabolome analysis of differential responses of diploid and haploid yeast to ethanol stress. OMICS 14: 553-561.
35. Li H, Ma ML, Luo S, Zhang RM, Han P, et al. (2012) Metabolic responses to ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44: 1087-1096.
36. Dunn WB, Ellis DI, (2005) Metabolomics: Current analytical platforms and methodologies. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry 24: 285-294.
37. Lourenço AB, Ascenso J, Sá-Correia I, (2011) Metabolic insights into the yeast response to propionic acid based on high resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy. Metabolomics 7: 457-468.
38. de Koning W, van Dam K, (1992) A method for the determination of changes of glycolytic metabolites in yeast on a subsecond time scale using extraction at neutral pH. Anal Biochem 204: 118-123.
39. Gonzalez B, Francois J, Renaud M, (1997) A rapid and reliable method for metabolite extraction in yeast using boiling buffered ethanol. Yeast 13: 1347-1355.
40. Dieterle F, Ross A, Schlotterbeck G, Senn H, (2006) Probabilistic quotient normalization as robust method to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures. Application in 1H NMR metabonomics. Anal Chem 78: 4281-4290.
41. Xia J, Psychogios N, Young N, Wishart DS, (2009) MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W652-660.
42. Bakker BM, Overkamp KM, van Maris AJ, Kotter P, Luttik MA, et al. (2001) Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25: 15-37.
43. Forster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J, (2003) Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 13: 244-253.
44. Vemuri GN, Eiteman MA, McEwen JE, Olsson L, Nielsen J, (2007) Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 2402-2407.
45. Vandijken JP, Scheffers WA, (1986) Redox Balances in the Metabolism of Sugars by Yeasts. Fems Microbiology Reviews 32: 199-224.
46. Martini S, Ricci M, Bartolini F, Bonechi C, Braconi D, et al. (2006) Metabolic response to exogenous ethanol in yeast: an in vivo NMR and mathematical modelling approach. Biophys Chem 120: 135-142.
47. D'Amore T, Stewart GG, (1987) Ethanol Tolerance of Yeast. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 9: 322-330.
48. Ansanay-Geleote V, Blondin B, Dequin S, Sablayrolles JM, (2001) Stress effect of ethanol on fermentation kinetics by stationary-phase cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Letters 23: 677-681.
49. Leskovac V, Trivic S, Pericin D, (2002) The three zinc-containing alcohol dehydrogenases from baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2: 481-494.
50. Schoondermark-Stolk SA, Tabernero M, Chapman J, ter Schure EG, Verrips CT, et al. (2005) Bat2p is essential in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fusel alcohol production on the non-fermentable carbon source ethanol. Fems Yeast Research 5: 757-766.
51. Cheraiti N, Guezenec S, Salmon JM, (2005) Redox interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum in mixed culture under enological conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 255-260.
52. Vriesekoop F, Barber AR, Pamment NB, (2007) Acetaldehyde mediates growth stimulation of ethanol-stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence of a redox-driven mechanism. Biotechnology Letters 29: 1099-1103.
53. Jain VK, Divol B, Prior BA, Bauer FF, (2012) Effect of alternative NAD(+)-regenerating pathways on the formation of primary and secondary aroma compounds in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycerol-defective mutant. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 93: 131-141.
54. Devantier R, Scheithauer B, Villas-Boas SG, Pedersen S, Olsson L, (2005) Metabolite profiling for analysis of yeast stress response during very high gravity ethanol fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng 90: 703-714.
55. Gombert AK, dos Santos MM, Christensen B, Nielsen J, (2001) Network identification and flux quantification in the central metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different conditions of glucose repression. Journal of Bacteriology 183: 1441-1451.
56. Camarasa C, Grivet JP, Dequin S, (2003) Investigation by 13C-NMR and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) deletion mutant analysis of pathways for succinate formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic fermentation. Microbiology-Sgm 149: 2669-2678.
57. Boles E, Lehnert W, Zimmermann FK, (1993) The Role of the Nad-Dependent Glutamate-Dehydrogenase in Restoring Growth on Glucose of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Phosphoglucose Isomerase Mutant. European Journal of Biochemistry 217: 469-477.
58. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J, (2000) Optimization of Ethanol Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Metabolic Engineering of the Ammonium Assimilation. Metabolic Engineering 2: 69-77.
59. Guillamon JM, van Riel NAW, Giuseppin MLF, Verrips CT, (2001) The glutamate synthase (GOGAT) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae plays an important role in central nitrogen metabolism. Fems Yeast Research 1: 169-175.
60. dos Santos MM, Thygesen G, Kotter P, Olsson L, Nielsen J, (2003) Aerobic physiology of redox-engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains modified in the ammonium assimilation for increased NADPH availability. Fems Yeast Research 4: 59-68.
61. Baerends RJS, Qiu JL, Rasmussen S, Nielsen HB, Brandt A, (2009) Impaired Uptake and/or Utilization of Leucine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Suppressed by the SPT15-300 Allele of the TATA-Binding Protein Gene. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 6055-6061.
62. Takagi H, Takaoka M, Kawaguchi A, Kubo Y, (2005) Effect of L-proline on sake brewing and ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 8656-8662.
63. Kaino T, Takagi H, (2008) Gene expression profiles and intracellular contents of stress protectants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol and sorbitol stresses. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 79: 273-283.
64. Ma M, Liu ZL, (2010) Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87: 829-845.
65. Luyten K, Albertyn J, Skibbe WF, Prior BA, Ramos J, et al. (1995) Fps1, a yeast member of the MIP family of channel proteins, is a facilitator for glycerol uptake and efflux and is inactive under osmotic stress. EMBO Journal 14: 1360-1371.
66. Chen YJ, Feldman DE, Deng CC, Brown JA, De Giacomo AF, et al. (2005) Identification of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways that confer resistance to endoplasmic reticulum stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Cancer Research 3: 669-677.