Bench-to-bedside review: Functional hemodynamics during surgery - should it be used for all high-risk cases?

Critical Care

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Perel, Azriel ^a,b   Habicher, Marit ^a   Sander, Michael ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; AIRWAY PRESSURE; BLEEDING; BREATHING RATE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RHYTHM; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; SURGERY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; SYSTOLE; TIDAL VOLUME;

BLOOD PRESSURE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY RATE; STROKE VOLUME; SYSTOLE; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84873283397     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/cc11448     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008, 109:723-740. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181863117, 18813052.
2. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:1392-1402. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5, 20966436.
3. Gurgel ST, Do Nascimento P. Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:1384-1391. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182055384, 21156979.
4. CardioQ-ODM Quick Reference Guide for the OR. , http://www. deltexmedical.com/downloads/clinicaleducationguides/CQ_OR_QRG9051_5309_3.pdf
5. Hood JA, Wilson RJT. Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011, 113:1058-1063. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c10cd, 21965349.
6. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005, 9:R687-R693. 10.1186/cc3887, 1414018, 16356219.
7. Cecconi M, Fasano N, Langiano N, Divella M, Costa MG, Rhodes A, Rocca Della G. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia. Crit Care 2011, 15:R132. 10.1186/cc10246, 3218998, 21624138.
8. Svensén CH, Olsson J, Hahn RG. Intravascular fluid administration and hemodynamic performance during open abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2006, 103:671-676. 10.1213/01.ane.0000226092.48770.fe, 16931679.
9. Kastrup M, Markewitz A, Spies C, Carl M, Erb J, Grosse J, Schirmer U. Current practice of hemodynamic monitoring and vasopressor and inotropic therapy in post-operative cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51:347-358. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01190.x, 17096667.
10. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 2011, 15:R197. 10.1186/cc10364, 3387639, 21843353.
11. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008. 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000, 12065368.
12. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the Tale of Seven Mares. Chest 2008, 134:172-178. 10.1378/chest.07-2331, 18628220.
13. Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A, Baron JF, Le Bret F, Saada M, Viars P. A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994, 78:46-53.
14. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuff e G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsisinduced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1313-1321. 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00007, 9856704.
15. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:746-755. 10.1093/bja/aei262, 16286349.
16. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da, 19602972.
17. Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007, 13:549-553. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282ec68b2, 17762234.
18. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1309-1310. 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00005, 9856702.
19. Monnet X, Letierce A, Hamzaoui O, Chemla D, Anguel N, Osman D, Richard C, Teboul J-L. Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:1394-1399. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820edcf0, 21336124.
20. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJD, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, Torres A. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:575-590. 10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4, 17285286.
21. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011, 17:290-295. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834699cd, 21508838.
22. Perel A. The physiological basis of arterial pressure variation during positive-pressure ventilation. Réanimation 2005, 14:162-171.
23. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005, 103:419-428. 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00026, 16052125.
24. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Annals Intensive Care 2011, 1:1.
25. Cannesson M, Aboy M, Hofer CK, Rehman M. Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?. J Clin Monit Comput 2010, 25:45-56.
26. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Augarde R, Prin S, Page B, Beauchet A, Jardin F. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support revisited by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 168:671-676. 10.1164/rccm.200301-135OC, 12869360.
27. Magder S. Further cautions for the use of ventilatory-induced changes in arterial pressures to predict volume responsiveness. Crit Care 2010, 14:197. 10.1186/cc9223, 3219239, 20920155.
28. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987, 67:498-502. 10.1097/00000542-198710000-00009, 3310740.
29. Mallat J, Pironkov A, Destandau M-S, Tavernier B. Systolic pressure variation (Deltadown) can guide fluid therapy during pheochromocytoma surgery. Can J Anaesth 2003, 50:998-1003. 10.1007/BF03018362, 14656776.
30. Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007, 100:245-250. 10.1093/bja/aem361, 18083787.
31. Shamir M, Eidelman LA, Floman Y, Kaplan L, Pizov R. Pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform during changes in blood volume. Br J Anaesth 1999, 82:178-181. 10.1093/bja/82.2.178, 10364990.
32. Pizov R, Segal E, Kaplan L, Floman Y, Perel A. The use of systolic pressure variation in hemodynamic monitoring during deliberate hypotension in spine surgery. J Clin Anesth 1990, 2:96-100. 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90061-7, 2346658.
33. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162:134-138.
34. Thiele RH, Colquhoun DA, Blum FE, Durieux ME. The ability of anesthesia providers to visually estimate systolic pressure variability using the 'eyeball' technique. Anesth Analg 2012, 115:176-181. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824d5fa1, 22467895.
35. Rinehart J, Islam T, Boud R, Nguyen A, Alexander B, Canales C, Cannesson M. Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study. J Clin Monit Comput 2012, 26:191-196. 10.1007/s10877-012-9359-8, 22491961.
36. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, Wysocki M, Pinsky MR, Lecarpentier Y, Teboul JL. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159:935-939.
37. Berkenstadt H, Friedman Z, Preisman S, Keidan I, Livingstone D, Perel A. Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs. Br J Anaesth 2005, 94:721-726. 10.1093/bja/aei116, 15769736.
38. Michard F, Lopes MR, Auler JOC. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care 2007, 11:131. 10.1186/cc5905, 2206397, 17521454.
39. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VOS, Lemos IPB, Auler JOC, Michard F. Goaldirected fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007, 11:R100. 10.1186/cc6117, 2556743, 17822565.
40. Gouvea G, Diaz R, Auler L, Toledo R, Martinho JM. Evaluation of the pulse pressure variation index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:238-243. 10.1093/bja/aep123, 19454548.
41. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004, 126:1563-1568. 10.1378/chest.126.5.1563, 15539728.
42. Belloni L, Pisano A, Natale A, Piccirillo MR, Piazza L, Ismeno G, De Martino G. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008, 22:243-248. 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.07.007, 18375327.
43. Auler JO, Galas F, Hajjar L, Santos L, Carvalho T, Michard F. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008, 106:1201-1206. 10.1213/01.ane.0000287664.03547.c6, 18349193.
44. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, Degryse C, Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010, 104:407-413. 10.1093/bja/aeq031, 20190260.
45. Murugan R, Venkataraman R, Wahed AS, Elder M, Carter M, Madden NJ, Kellum JA. Preload responsiveness is associated with increased interleukin-6 and lower organ yield from brain-dead donors. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2387-2393. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a960d6, 2864555, 19531941.
46. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot J-J, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a 'gray zone' approach. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:231-241. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a, 21705869.
47. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y, Perel A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001, 92:984-989.
48. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28:392-398. 10.1007/s00134-002-1211-z, 11967591.
49. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003, 31:1399-1404. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000059442.37548.E1, 12771609.
50. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008, 12:R82. 10.1186/cc6933, 2481481, 18570641.
51. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Hénaine R, Lehot J-J. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009, 108:513-517. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318192a36b, 19151280.
52. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Röhm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010, 14:R18. 10.1186/cc8875, 2875533, 20156348.
53. Kobayashi M, Koh M, Irinoda T, Meguro E, Hayakawa Y, Takagane A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of intravascular volume depression and possible hypotension during the early postoperative period after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16:1371-1377. 10.1245/s10434-008-0139-0, 19219508.
54. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:761-768. 10.1093/bja/aen277, 18852114.
55. Perel A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2008, 106:1031-1033. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318167abe5, 18349170.
56. Maguire S, Rinehart J, Vakharia S, Cannesson M. Respiratory variation in pulse pressure and plethysmographic waveforms. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:94-96. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318200366b, 20978246.
57. Pizov R, Eden A, Bystritski D, Kalina E, Tamir A, Gelman S. Arterial and plethysmographic waveform analysis in anesthetized patients with hypovolemia. Anesthesiology 2010, 113:83-91. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181da839f, 20526193.
58. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:200-206. 10.1093/bja/aen133, 18522935.
59. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot FR, Vallet B. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006, 97:808-816. 10.1093/bja/ael250, 16980709.
60. Wyffels PAH, Durnez P-J, Helderweirt J, Stockman WMA, De Kegel D. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2007, 105:448-452. 10.1213/01.ane.0000267520.16003.17, 17646504.
61. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, La Torre G, Mannocci A, De Waure C, Bello G, Maviglia R, Antonelli M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:1475-1483. 10.1007/s00134-010-1929-y, 20502865.
62. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul J-L. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:951-956. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1, 19237902.
63. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A, Dres M, Gharbi R, Richard C, Teboul J-L. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:152-157. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7, 21926581.
64. Perel A. The value of functional hemodynamic parameters in hemodynamic monitoring of ventilated patients. Anaesthesist 2003, 52:1003-1004.
65. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 1989, 15:368-371.
66. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MSG, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003, 29:476-480.
67. Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent J-L. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:517-523. 10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4, 15754196.
68. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJAM, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012, 108:395-401. 10.1093/bja/aer411, 22185905.
69. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:1092-1097. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819db2a1, 19352152.
70. Malbrain ML, de Laet I. Functional hemodynamics and increased intraabdominal pressure: same thresholds for diff erent conditions ...?. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:781-783. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194c397, 19325388.
71. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Hijazi M, Zogheib E, Tinturier F, Slama M, Dupont H. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1824-1829. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3c21, 20639753.
72. Sander M, Spies CD, Berger K, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Krämer M, Carl M, Heymann Von C. Prediction of volume response under open-chest conditions during coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care 2007, 11:R121. 10.1186/cc6181, 2246213, 18034888.
73. Teboul J-L. Meaning of pulse pressure variation during cardiac surgery: everything is open. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:757-758. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194d575, 19325373.
74. Wyffels PAH, Sergeant P, Wouters PF. The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery. Anaesthesia 2010, 65:704-709. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06371.x, 20477782.
75. De Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:510-515. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958bf7, 19114886.
76. Chung E, Cannesson M. Using non invasive dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness in children: there is still much to learn. J Clin Monit Comput 2012, 26:153-155. 10.1007/s10877-012-9353-1, 22430745.
77. Pizov R, Ya'ari Y, Perel A. The arterial pressure waveform during acute ventricular failure and synchronized external chest compression. Anesth Analg 1989, 68:150-156. 10.1213/00000539-198902000-00015, 2643888.
78. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, Hluchy M, Kasal E, Svitak R, Pradl R, Stepan M. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010, 14:R118. 10.1186/cc9070, 2911766, 20553586.
79. Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, Schenke S, van Hout N, Sakka SG. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:194-199. 10.1093/bja/aen126, 18511439.
80. Futier E, Constantin J-M, Petit A, Chanques G, Kwiatkowski F, Flamein R, Slim K, Sapin V, Jaber S, Bazin J-E. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goaldirected fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2010, 145:1193-1200. 10.1001/archsurg.2010.275, 21173294.
81. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 2010, 111:910-914.