What is a fluid challenge?

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 290-295

  Cecconi, Maurizio ^a   Parsons, Anthony K ^a   Rhodes, Andrew ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac function; colloid; crystalloid; preload response; stroke volume

Indexed keywords

HYPERTONIC SOLUTION; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; BODY POSITION; CARDIOPULMONARY FUNCTION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; COLLOID; CRYSTALLOID; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PERFUSION; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; VENOUS RETURN;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; COLLOIDS; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 79955628982     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834699cd     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Weil MH, Henning RJ. New concepts in the diagnosis and fluid treatment of circulatory shock. Thirteenth annual Becton, Dickinson and Company Oscar Schwidetsky Memorial Lecture. Anesth Analg 1979; 58:124-132.
2. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:344-353. (Pubitemid 43145611)
3. Nixon JV, Murray RG, Leonard PD, et al. Effect of large variations in preload on left ventricular performance characteristics in normal subjects. Circulation 1982; 65:698-703. (Pubitemid 12133231)
4. Hall J. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Edinburgh/Oxford: Elsevier Saunders/Elsevier Science [distributor]; 2006.
5. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:820-826.
6. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005; 9:R687-R693.
7. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid managementon outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1069-1076. (Pubitemid 44343503)
8. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:575-590.
9. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2010. [Epub ahead of print]
10. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008. (Pubitemid 34634425)
11. Harvey SE, Welch CA, Harrison DA, et al. Post hoc insights from PAC-Man: the U.K. pulmonary artery catheter trial. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:1714-1721.
12. Hofer CK, Cecconi M, Marx G, Della Rocca G. Minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:996-1002.
13. Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Della Rocca G, et al. Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2010; 7:116-124.
14. Rhodes A, Grounds RM. New technologies for measuring cardiac output: the future? Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:224-226. (Pubitemid 40835095)
15. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1309-1310. (Pubitemid 29001566)
16. Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:235-239. (Pubitemid 40835097)
17. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1333-1337.
18. Weil MH, Shubin H. The 'VIP' approach to the bedside management of shock. JAMA 1969; 207:337-340.
19. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:296-327.
20. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178.
21. Magder S, Lagonidis D, Erice F. The use of respiratory variations in right atrial pressure to predict the cardiac output response to PEEP. J Crit Care 2001; 16:108-114. (Pubitemid 33043106)
22. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68. (Pubitemid 46035678)
23. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Runge I, et al. Central venous pressure measurements improve the accuracy of leg raising-induced change in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:940-948.
24. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:65-71. (Pubitemid 34048564)
25. Pinsky MR. Clinical significance of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:175-178. (Pubitemid 36384405)
26. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699. (Pubitemid 38340065)
27. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapyin the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377.
28. Jammer I, Ulvik A, Erichsen C, et al. Does central venous oxygen saturation-directed fluid therapy affect postoperative morbidity after colorectal surgery? A randomized assessor-blinded controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1072-1080.
29. 2 as a marker to define fluid responsiveness. J Trauma 2011; 70:802-807.
30. Cannesson M, Aboy M, Hofer CK, Rehman M. Pulse pressure variation: where are we today? J Clin Monit Comput 2010. [Epub ahead of print]
31. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1475-1483.
32. Lee JH, Kim JT, Yoon SZ, et al. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oeso-phageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:343-348. (Pubitemid 47316387)
33. Singer M. The FTc is not an accurate marker of left ventricular preload. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1089-1091.
34. Perel P, Roberts I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD000567.
35. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, et al. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1801-1808.