Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: A randomized simulation study

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 191-196

  Rinehart, Joseph ^a   Islam, Tanzeem ^a   Boud, Rob ^a   Nguyen, Allison ^a   Alexander, Brenton ^a   Canales, Cecilia ^a   Cannesson, Maxime ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Fluid responsiveness; Pulse pressure variation; Visual estimation

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURES; CONTROL GROUPS; FLUID THERAPY; FLUID-RESPONSIVENESS; GROUP CLASSIFICATION; MEAN PERCENT ERROR; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE-PRESSURE VARIATION; SIMULATION STUDIES; SIMULATOR PROGRAMS; SURVEY DATA; SWEEP SPEED; VISUAL ESTIMATION; WAVE FORMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA VISUALIZATION;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYEBALL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RELIABILITY; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL ESTIMATION; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84865128498     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9359-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "Gray Zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:896-7.
2. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642-7.
3. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:134-8. (Pubitemid 30469810)
4. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:419-28. quiz 449-415. (Pubitemid 41076740)
5. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, Bauer C, Chiari P, Henaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1195-200. table of contents. (Pubitemid 351450545)
6. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care. 2011;15:R197.
7. Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A, Fleischmann E, Hetz H. Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:346-51.
8. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:487-97.
9. Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, Schenke S, van Hout N, Sakka SG. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:194-9. (Pubitemid 351989656)
10. Rinehart J, Alexander B, Le Manach Y, Hofer C, Tavernier B, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. Evaluation of a novel closed-loop fluid administration system based on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness: an in silico simulation study. Crit Care. 2011; 15(6):p R278.
11. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO Jr, Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11:R100.
12. Aboy M, Crespo C, Austin D. An enhanced automatic algorithm for estimation of respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure during regions of abrupt hemodynamic changes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56:2537-45.
13. Aboy M, McNames J, Thong T, Phillips CR, Ellenby MS, Goldstein B. A novel algorithm to estimate the pulse pressure variation index deltaPP. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51: 2198-203. (Pubitemid 39578017)
14. Cannesson M, Aboy M, Hofer CK, Rehman M. Pulse pressure variation: where are we today? J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24(3): 177-188.
15. Kim S, Aboy M, McNames J. Pulse pressure variation estimation using a sequential monte carlo method. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:5713-6.
16. Cannesson M, Vallet B, Michard F. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation: from flying blind to flying right? Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(6):896-7. author reply 897-899.
17. Gouvea G, Diaz R, Auler L, Toledo R, Martinho JM. Evaluation of the pulse pressure variation index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:238-43.
18. Gouvea G, Gouvea FG. Measurement of systolic pressure variation on a Datex AS/3 monitor. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1864. (Pubitemid 40712763)