Meaning of pulse pressure variation during cardiac surgery: Everything is open

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 757-758

  Teboul, Jean Louis ^a  

^a BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiac preload; Cardiac surgery; Fluid responsiveness; Open chest surgery; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

AERATION; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EDITORIAL; EXPIRATORY RESERVE VOLUME; FLUID BALANCE; HEART AFTERLOAD; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FILLING PRESSURE; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; LUNG BLOOD VESSEL; LUNG PRESSURE; LUNG WEDGE PRESSURE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; STARLING LAW; THORAX SURGERY; TIDAL VOLUME;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 67650346168     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194d575     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell, et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699
2. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict he-modynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68
3. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178
4. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008
5. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138
6. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568
7. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional hae-modynamic parameters including the Respi- ratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-755
8. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al: Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-989
9. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al: Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392-398
10. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al: Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1402-1407
11. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL: How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care 2006; 10:R102
12. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523
13. de Waal EEC, Rex S, Kruitwagen CLJJ, et al: Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:510-515
14. Jardin F, Delorme G, Hardy A, et al: Reeval-uation of hemodynamic consequences of positive pressure ventilation: Emphasis on cyclic right ventricular afterloading by mechanical lung inflation. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:966-970
15. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresch T, et al: Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 318-323