An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 17-34

  Rosenthal von der Pütten, Astrid M ^a   Krämer, Nicole C ^a   Hoffmann, Laura ^a   Sobieraj, Sabrina ^a   Eimler, Sabrina C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Emotional response; Empathy; Experimental study; Human robot interaction; Psychophysiological measures

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ANECDOTAL EVIDENCES; EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENTS; EMOTIONAL RESPONSE; EMPATHY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FRIENDLY INTERACTION; MULTI-METHOD APPROACH; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 84872579192     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Appel J, von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Gratch J (2012) Does humanity matter? Analyzing the importance of social cues and perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction. Adv Hum Compt Int 2012: 324694. doi: 10. 1155/2012/324694.
2. Arkin RC, Fujita M, Takagi T, Hasegawa R (2003) An ethological and emotional basis for human-robot interaction: socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3-4): 191-201. doi: 10. 1016/S0921-8890(02)00375-5.
3. Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 701-706. doi: 10. 1109/ROMAN. 2008. 4600749.
4. Bainbridge WA, Hart JW, Kim ES, Scassellatti B (2010) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3: 41-52.
5. Barsalou L, Breazeal C, Smith L (2007) Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cogn Process 8(2): 79-91. doi: 10. 1007/s10339-007-0163-1.
6. Bartneck C (2002) eMuu-an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home. PhD thesis, Eindhoven. http://www. bartneck. de/publications/2002/eMuu/bartneckPHDThesis2002. pdf. Accesssed 3 May 2011.
7. Bartneck C, Hu J (2008) Exploring the abuse of robots. Interact Stud 9: 415-433. doi: 10. 1075/is. 9. 3. 04bar.
8. Bartneck C, Rosalia C, Menges R, Deckers I (2005) Robot abuse-a limitation of the media equation. In: Proceedings of the interact 2005 workshop on abuse, Rome, Italy. http://www. bartneck. de/publications/2005/robotAbuse/index. html. Accesssed 16 March 2011.
9. Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 117(3): 497-529. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 117. 3. 497.
10. Beck A, Cañamero L, Bard KA (2010) Towards an affect space for robots to display emotional body language. In: 19th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication principe di Piemonte, Viareggio, Italy.
11. Becker-Asano C, Ishiguro H (2009) Laughter in social robotics-no laughing matter. In: Proc intl workshop on social intelligence design (SID2009), pp 287-300.
12. Becker-Asano C, Ishiguro H (2011) Evaluating facial displays of emotion for the android robot geminoid F. In: IEEE SSCI workshop on affective computational intelligence, p 2229.
13. Becker-Asano C, Wachsmuth I (2008) Affect simulation with primary and secondary emotions: intelligent virtual agents. In: Prendinger H, Lester J, Ishizuka M (eds) Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 15-28.
14. Becker-Asano C, Wachsmuth I (2010) Affective computing with primary and secondary emotions in a virtual human. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 20(1): 32-49. doi: 10. 1007/s10458-009-9094-9.
15. Becker-Asano C, Kanda T, Ishi C, Ishiguro H (2009) How about laughter? Perceived naturalness of two laughing humanoid robots. Affective computing and intelligent interaction. IEEE Press, Amsterdam.
16. Benedek M, Kaernbach C (2010) A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. J Neurosci Methods 190: 80-91. doi: 10. 1016/j. jneumeth. 2010. 04. 028.
17. Bente G, Petersen A, Krämer NC, de Ruiter JP (2001) Transcript-based computer animation of movement: evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 33(3): 303-310.
18. Bethel CL (2009) Robots without faces: non-verbal social human-robot interaction. Dissertation, University of South Florida.
19. Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A, Nehaniv CL, Lee D (2006) Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human-robot interaction design. In: Proceedings of 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2006), pp 469-474.
20. Breazeal C (2002) Designing sociable robots: issues and lessons. In: Dautenhahn KK, Bond AH, Canamero L, Edmonds B (eds) Socially intelligent agents. Creating relationships with computers and robots. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 149-156.
21. Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots: applications of affective computing in human-computer interaction. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 59(1-2): 119-155. doi: 10. 1016/S1071-5819(03)00018-1.
22. Bruce A, Nourbakhsh I, Simmons R (2001) The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI fall symposium, Cape Cod, MA, USA.
23. Cacioppo JT, Patrick B (2008) Loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection. Norton, New York.
24. Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (2007) Psychophysiological science: interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1-18.
25. Cañamero L (2002) Playing the emotion game with Feelix: socially intelligent agents. In: Dautenhahn K, Bond A, Cañamero L, Edmonds B (eds) Multiagent systems, artificial societies, and simulated organizations. Springer, New York, pp 69-76.
26. Cañamero L (2005) Emotion understanding from the perspective of autonomous robots research: emotion and brain. Neural Netw 18(4): 445-455. doi: 10. 1016/j. neunet. 2005. 03. 003.
27. Carpenter J, Davis J, Erwin-Stewart N, Lee T, Bransford J, Vye N (2009) Gender representation and humanoid robots designed for domestic use. Int J Soc Robot 1(3): 261-265. doi: 10. 1007/s12369-009-0016-4.
28. Carvallo M, Pelham BW (2006) When fiends become friends: the need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination. J Pers Soc Psychol 90: 94-105. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 90. 1. 94.
29. Cassell J, Stocky T, Bickmore T, Gao Y, Nakano Y, Ryokai K, Tversky D, Vaucelle C, Vilhjálmsson H (2002) MACK: media lab autonomous conversational kiosk. In: Proceedings of Imagina02, Monte Carlo.
30. Cassell J, Bickmore T (2000) External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Commun ACM 43(12): 50-56. doi: 10. 1145/355112. 355123.
31. Cheng Y, Tzeng OJ, Decety J, Hsieh JC (2006) Gender differences in the human mirror system: a magnetoencephalography study. NeuroReport 17: 1115-1119. doi: 10. 1097/01. wnr. 0000223393. 59328. 21.
32. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
33. Crowell CR, Villano M, Scheutz M, Schermerhorn P (2009) Gendered voice and robot entities: perceptions and reactions of male and female subjects. In: Intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2009), pp 3735-3741.
34. Dautenhahn K (1998) Elektronische Sisyphusse [Electronic sisyphuses]. Interview in the online magazine Pointer. http://www. gmd. de/pointer/. Accessed 27 July 2005.
35. Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters M, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In: Proc IEEE IRS/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2005), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2-6 August 2005, pp 1488-1493.
36. Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44: 113-126. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 44. 1. 113.
37. Davis MH (1983) The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: a multidimensional approach. J Pers 51(2): 167-184. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-6494. 1983. tb00860. x.
38. DeCremer D, Leonardelli GJ (2003) Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: the moderating effect of group size. Group Dyn 7(2): 168-174. doi: 10. 1037/1089-2699. 7. 2. 168.
39. Eimler SC, von Krämer NC, der Pütten AM (2010) Prerequisites for human-agent and human-robot interaction: towards an integrated theory. In: Trappl R (ed) European meetings on cybernetics and systems research (EMCSR 2010), Vienna, Austria.
40. Eimler SC, Krämer NC, von der Pütten AM (2011) Determinants of acceptance and emotion attribution in confrontation with a robot rabbit. Appl Artif Intell 25(6): 447-502. doi: 10. 1080/08839514. 2011. 587154.
41. Eisenberg N, Lennon R (1983) Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychol Bull 94(1): 100-131. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 94. 1. 100.
42. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1990) Empathy: conceptualization, assessment, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motiv Emot 14: 131-149. doi: 10. 1007/BF00991640.
43. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3. 1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 41: 1149-1160. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 41. 4. 1149.
44. Gadanho SC, Hallam J (2001) Robot learning driven by emotions. Adapt Behav 9(1): 42-64. doi: 10. 1177/105971230200900102.
45. Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 55-60. doi: 10. 1109/ROMAN. 2003. 1251796.
46. Gratch J, Marsella S (2001) Tears and fears: modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents. In: Conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, Canada.
47. Groom V, Takayama L, Ochi P, Nass C (2009) I am my robot: the impact of robot-building and robot form on operators. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI'09). ACM Press, New York.
48. Hegel F, Eyssel F, Wrede B (2010) The social robot 'Flobi': key concepts of industrial design. 19th. In: IEEE international symposium in robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2010), Viareggio, Italy.
49. Hein G, Singer T (2008) I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation: cognitive neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18(2): 153-158. doi: 10. 1016/j. conb. 2008. 07. 012.
50. Hoffmann L, Krämer NC, Lam-chi A, Kopp S (2009) Media equation revisited: do users show polite reactions towards an embodied agent? In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Springer, Berlin, pp 159-165. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-04380-2_19.
51. Hoffmann L, Krämer NC (2011) How should an artificial entity be embodied? Comparing the effects of a physically present robot and its virtual representation. Paper presented at the HRI 2011 workshop on social robotic telepresence, March 2011, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp 14-20.
52. Itoh K, Miwa H, Nukariya Y, Zecca M, Takanobu H, Roccella S, Carrozza MC, Dario P, Atsuo T (2006) Development of a bioinstrumentation system in the interaction between a human and a robot. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2620-2625.
53. Jung Y, Lee KM (2004) Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. In: Proceedings of PRESENCE 2004, pp 80-87. doi: 10. 1145/1349822. 1349866.
54. Jung B, Kopp S (2003) FlurMax: an interactive virtual agent for entertaining visitors in a hallway. In: Rist T, Aylett R, Ballin D, Rickel J (eds) IVA 2003. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 2792. Springer, Berlin, pp 23-26. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-540-39396-2_5.
55. Kahn P et al (2012) Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? In: International conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2012), Boston, USA. doi: 10. 1145/2157689. 2157696.
56. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2003) Body movement analysis of human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 177-182.
57. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Ono T, Imai M, Nakatsu R (2002) Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot "Robovie". In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA'02), vol 2, pp 1848-1855. doi: 10. 1109/ROBOT. 2002. 1014810.
58. Kanda T, Kamasima M, Imai M, Ono T, Sakamoto D, Ishiguro H, Anzai Y (2007) A humanoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human. Auton Robots 22(1): 87-100. doi: 10. 1007/s10514-006-9007-6.
59. Kanda T, Miyashita T, Osada T, Haikawa Y, Ishiguro H (2005) Analysis of humanoid appearances in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ intelligent robot systems (IROS 2005), pp 899-906. doi: 10. 1109/IROS. 2005. 1544960.
60. Kappas A (2005) My happy vacuum cleaner. In: ISRE general meeting, symposium on artificial emotions, Bari.
61. Kidd C (2003) Sociable robots: the role of presence and task in human-robot interaction. Masterthesis. http://web. media. mit. edu/~coryk/papers/Kidd_MS_thesis. pdf. Accessed 30 September 2010.
62. Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2004) Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In: Proceedings of IROS 2004. doi: 10. 1109/IROS. 2004. 1389967.
63. Kiesler S, Powers A, Fussel SR, Torrey C (2008) Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Soc Cogn 26(2): 169-181. doi: 10. 1521/soco. 2008. 26. 2. 169.
64. Klamer T, BenAllouch S (2010) Acceptance and use of a zoomorphic robot in a domestic setting. In: Trappl R (ed) Proceedings of EMCSR 2010, Vienna.
65. Klamer T, BenAllouch S (2010) Zoomorphic robots used by elderly people at home. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI-2010), Atlanta, GA. ACM, New York.
66. Krämer NC, Eimler SC, von der Pütten AM, Payr S (2011) Theory of companions: what can theoretical models contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Appl Artif Intell 25(6): 474-502. doi: 10. 1080/08839514. 2011. 587153.
67. Krämer NC, Tietz B, Bente G (2003) Effects of embodied interface agents and their gestural activity. In: Aylett R, Ballin D, Rist T, Rickel J (eds) 4th international working conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Hamburg, pp 292-300.
68. Kulic D, Croft E (2007) Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion. Robotica 25: 13-27. doi: 10. 1017/S0263574706002955.
69. Kubota N, Nojima Y, Baba N, Kojima F, Fukuda T (2000) Evolving pet robot with emotional model. In: Proceedings of the 2000 congress on evolutionary computation, vol 2, pp 1231-1237. doi: 10. 1109/CEC. 2000. 870791.
70. Lamm H, Stephan E (1986) Zur Messung von Einsamkeit: Entwicklung einer deutschen Fassung des Fragebogens von Russell und Peplau. Z Arbeits- Organisationspsychol 30: 132-134.
71. Leary MR, Kelly KM, Cottrell CA, Schreindorfer LS (2007) Individual differences in the need to belong: mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University.
72. Leite I, Martinho C, Pereira A, Paiva A (2008) iCat: an affective game buddy based on anticipatory mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, Estoril, Portugal, vol 3. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Estoril, pp 1229-1232.
73. Leite I, Pereira A, Martinho C, Paiva A (2008) Are emotional robots more fun to play with? In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2008), pp 77-82.
74. Marsella S, Gratch J, Petta P (2010) Computational models of emotion. In: Scherer KR, Bänziger T, Roesch E (eds) A blueprint for a affective computing: a sourcebook and manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
75. Mehrabian A (1976) Questionnaire measures of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection. Psychol Rep 38(1): 199-209. doi: 10. 2466/pr0. 1976. 38. 1. 199.
76. Meyer ML, Masten CL, Ma Y, Wang C, Shi Z, Eisenberger NI, Han S (2012) Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nss019.
77. Milgram S (1974) In: Obedience to authority: an experimental view. Tavistock, London.
78. Nass C, Isbister K, Lee E-J (2000) Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell J (ed) Embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 374-402.
79. Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56(1): 81-103. doi: 10. 1111/0022-4537. 00153.
80. Nass CI, Moon Y, Morkes J, Kim E-Y, Fogg BJ (1997) Computers are social actors: a review of current research. In: Human values and the design of computer technology, pp 137-162.
81. Ogata T, Sugano S (1999) Emotional communication between humans and the autonomous robot. Which has the emotion model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol 4, pp 3177-3182.
82. Paulus C (2009) The Saarbrueck personality questionnaire on empathy: psychometric evaluation of the German version of the interpersonal reactivity index. http://www. uni-saarland. de/fak5/ezw/personal/paulus/empathy/SPF_Artikel. pdf. Accessed 26 May 2012.
83. Pereira A, Martinho C, Leite I, Paiva A (2008) iCat the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on AAMAS, Estoril, Portugal, pp 1253-1256.
84. Pickett CL, Gardner W, Knowles M (2004) Getting a cue: the need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30(9): 1095-1107. doi: 10. 1177/0146167203262085.
85. Ravaja N (2004) Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: review and recommendations. Media Psychol 6(2): 193-235. doi: 10. 1207/s1532785xmep0602_4.
86. Read R, Belpaeme T (2012) How to use non-linguistic utterances to convey emotion in child-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of human-robot interaction (HRI'12), Boston, MA, 6th-8th March 2012. doi: 10. 1145/2157689. 2157764.
87. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
88. Rossen B, Johnsen K, Deladisma A, Lind S, Lok B (2008) Virtual humans elicit skin-tone bias consistent with real-world skin-tone biases. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Tokyo, Japan. Springer, Berlin, pp 237-244. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-540-85483-8_24.
89. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE (1980) The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(3): 472-480. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 39. 3. 472.
90. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) The darker and brighter sides of human existence: basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychol Inq 11(4): 319-338. doi: 10. 1207/S15327965PLI1104_03.
91. Singer, Seymore, O'Doherty, Stephan, Dolan, Frith (2006).
92. Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2006) Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439(7075): 466-469. doi: 10. 1038/nature04271.
93. Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J, Kogure K (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. Int J Human-Comput Stud 62(2): 267-279. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijhcs. 2004. 11. 003.
94. Slater M, Antley A, Davison A, Swapp D, Guger C, Barker C, Pistrang N, Sanchez-Vives MV (2006) A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1(1). doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0000039.
95. Smith J (2000) GrandChair: conversational collection of family stories. MIT Press, Cambridge.
96. Thomaz AL, Berlin M, Breazeal C (2005) An embodied computational model of social referencing. In: Proceedings of fourteenth IEEE workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN-05), Nashville, TN, pp 591-598. doi: 10. 1109/ROMAN. 2005. 1513844.
97. Turner JR (1994) Cardiovascular reactivity and stress: patterns of physiological response. Plenum, New York.
98. von der Pütten AM, Reipen C, Wiedmann A, Kopp S, Krämer NC (2008) Comparing emotional vs envelope feedback for ECAs. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Tokyo, Japan. Springer, Berlin, pp 550-551. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-540-85483-8_84.
99. von der Pütten AM, Reipen C, Wiedmann A, Kopp S, Krämer NC (2009) The impact of different embodied agent-feedback on users' behavior. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Springer, Berlin, pp 549-551. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-642-04380-2_86.
100. von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Gratch J, Kang S-H (2010) "It doesn't matter what you are!" explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Comput Hum Behav 26(6): 1641-1650. doi: 10. 1016/j. chb. 2010. 06. 012.
101. von der Pütten A, Krämer N, Eimler S (2011) Living with a robot companion: empirical study on the interaction with an artificial health advisor. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI'11). ACM, New York. doi: 10. 1145/2070481. 2070544.
102. Watson D, Tellegen A, Clark LA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6): 1063-1070. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 54. 6. 1063.
103. Wainer J, Feil-Seifer D, Shell D, Matarić MJ (2007) Embodiment and human-robot interaction: a task-based perspective. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2007), Jiju, Korea. doi: 10. 1109/ROMAN. 2007. 4415207.
104. Woods SN, Dautenhahn K, Kaouri C, Boekhorst R, Koay KL (2005) Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2005), pp 375-380. doi: 10. 1109/ICHR. 2005. 1573596.
105. Yan C, Peng W, Lee KM, Jin S-A (2004) Can robots have personality? An empirical study of personality manifestation, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the international communication association.
106. Yamato J, Shinozawa K, Naya F, Kogure K (2001) Effects of conversational agent and robot on user decision. In: IJCAI-01 workshop.
107. Zecca M, Roccella S, Carrozza M, Miwa H, Itoh K, Cappiello G et al (2004) On the development of the emotion expression humanoid robot WE-4RII with RCH-1. In: 4th IEEE/RAS international conference on humanoid robots, vol 1, pp 235-252.