Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits

Proceedings of 2005 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 375-380

  Woods, Sarah ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a   Kaouri, Christina ^a   Te Boekhorst, René ^a   Koay, Kheng Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eysenck model of personality; Human robot interaction; Personality traits; Robot companion; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; PERSONALITY TRAITS; ROBOT COMPANION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 33750553654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICHR.2005.1573596     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. C. L. Breazeal, Designing sociable robots. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002.
2. T. Minato, M. Shimada, H. Ishiguro, & S. Itakura, "Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction," Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3029, pp. 424-434, 2004.
3. S. Woods, K. Dautenhahn, & J. Schulz, "The design space of robots: Investigating children's views," Proc. Ro-Man, Japan, 2004, pp. 47-52.
4. D. C. Dryer, "Getting personal with computers: How to design personalities for agents," Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 273-295, 1999.
5. D. A. Norman, "How might people interact with agents," Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, pp. 68-71, 1994.
6. S. Woods, K. Dautenhahn, & J. Schulz, "Child and adults' perspective on robot appearance," Proc. AISB 05, UK, 2005, pp. 126-132.
7. J. Goetz & S. Kiesler, "Cooperation with a robotic assistant," presented at CHI'02, New York, USA, 2002.
8. J. Cassell & J. Bickmore, "Negotiated collusion: Modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents," User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 89-132, 2003.
9. P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, "Personality stability & its implications for clinical psychology," Clinical Psych. Review, vol. 6, pp. 407-423, 1986.
10. H. J. Eysenck & S. B. G. Eysenck, Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1975.
11. H. J. Eysenck, "Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm," Personality & Ind Differences, vol. 12, pp. 773-790, 1991.
12. P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, "Four ways five factors are basic," Personality & Ind. Differences, vol. 13, pp. 653-665, 1992.
13. H. J. Eysenck & M. W. Eysenck, Personality & ind. differences: A natural science approach. New York, USA: Plenum, 1985.
14. M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri, S. Woods, C. L. Nehaniv, D. Lee, I. Werry, "The Influence of Subjects' Personality Traits on Personal Spatial Zones in a Human-Robot Interaction Experiment", Proc. IEEE Ro-man, 2005, pp. 347-352.
15. M. Scopelliti, et al., "If I had a robot at home. Peoples' representation of domestic robots," in Designing a more inclusive world, S. Keates, et al. Eds. Cambridge, UK: Springer, 2004, pp. 257-266.