The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-52

  Bainbridge, Wilma A ^a   Hart, Justin W ^a   Kim, Elizabeth S ^a   Scassellati, Brian ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Human robot interaction; Personal space; Presence; Trust

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

COOPERATION; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; PERSONAL SPACES; POSITIVE INTERACTION; PRESENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE DATA; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; TRUST;

SOCIAL ROBOTS;

EID: 84857587230     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: ROMAN 2008: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Munich, Germany, pp 701-706
2. Bickmore T, Cassell J (2001) Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: CHI'01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 396-403
3. Bickmore TW, Picard RW (2005) Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(2):293-327
4. Burgoon JK, Bonito JA, Bengtsson B, Cederberg C, Lundeberg M, Allspach L (2000) Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Comput Hum Behav 16(6):553-574
5. Cassell J, Bickmore T, Billinghurst M, Campbell L, Chang K, Vil-hjálmsson H, Yan H (1999) Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. In: Proceedings of the CHI'99 conference. ACM Press, New York, pp 520-527
6. Goetz J, Kiesler S (2002) Cooperation with a robotic assistant. In: CHI'02: CHI'02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 578-579
7. Hall ET (1966) The Hidden Dimension, 1st edn. Doubleday, Garden City
8. Hayduk LA (1981) The shape of personal space: An experimental investigation. Can J Behav Sci 13(1):87-93
9. Jung Y, Lee KM (2004) Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. Spain, pp 80-87
10. Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2004) Effect of a robot on user perceptions, vol 4, pp 3559-3564
11. Lee KM (2004) Presence, explicated. Commun Theory 14:27-50
12. Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2)
13. Lombard M, Ditton TB, Crane D, Davis B, Gil-Egui G, Horvath K, Rossman J (2000) Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. Netherlands
14. Michel P, Gold K, Scassellati B (2004) Motion-based robotic self-recognition. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Japan
15. Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: HRI'07: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. ACM, New York, pp 145-152
16. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, video-displayed, and new media like real people and places. Center for the study of language and information
17. Rehnmark F, Bluethmann W, Mehling J, Ambrose RO, Diftler M, Chu M, Necessary R (2005) Robonaut: The 'short list' of technology hurdles. Computer 38(1):28-37
18. Shinozawa K, Naya F, Yamato J, Kogure K (2005) Differences in effect of robot and screen agent on human decision-making. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 62(2):267-279
19. Sidner C, Lee C, Kidd C, Lesh N, Rich C (2005) Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artif Intell 166(1-2):140-164
20. Steinfeld A, Jenkins OC, Scassellati B (2009) The oz of wizard: simulating the human for interaction research. In: HRI'09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction. ACM, New York, pp 101-108. doi:10.1145/ 1514095.1514115
21. Sun G, Scassellati B (2004) Reaching through learned forward model. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE-RAS/RSJ international conference on humanoid robots, CA
22. Takayama L, Pantofaru C (2009) Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 5495-5502
23. Wainer J, Feil-Seifer DJ, Shell DA, Matarić MJ (2006) The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE proceedings of the international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Hatfield, UK, pp 117-122
24. Wainer J, Feil-Seifer D, Shell D, Mataric M (2007) Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective, pp 872-877
25. Walters M, Dautenhahn K, Te-Boekhorst R, Koay KKL, Kaouri C, Woods S, Nehaniv C, Lee D, Werry I (2005) The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. In: IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. ROMAN 2005, pp 347-352
26. Woods SN, Walters ML, Koay KL, Dautenhahn K (2006) Methodological issues in hri: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials. In: Proc 15th IEEE int symp on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN 2006, pp 51-58
27. Yamato J, Brooks R, Shinozawa K, Naya F (2003) Human-robot dynamic social interaction. NTT Tech Rev 1(6):37-43