Transcript-based computer animation of movement: Evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 303-310

  Bente, Gary ^a   Petersen, Anita ^a   Krämer, Nicole C ^a   De Ruiter, Jan Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; PILOT STUDY; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PILOT PROJECTS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0035432781     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195383     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. ARGYLE, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Nonverbal communication (pp. 243-269). London: Methuen.
2. BENTE, G. (1989). Facilities for the graphical computer simulation of head and body movements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 455-462.
3. BENTE, G., FEIST, A., & ELDER, S. (1996). Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 213-228.
4. BENTE, G., PETERSEN, A., & KRÄMER, N. C. (1999). Virtuelle Realität und parasoziale Interaktion: Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Untersuchung sozioemotionaler Effekte computersimulierten Verhaltens [Virtual reality and parasocial interaction: A tool for analyzing socioemotional effects of computer-simulated behavior] (Research report). University of Cologne.
5. BERRY, D. S. (1990). The perceiver as naive scientist or the scientist as naive perceiver? An ecological view of social knowledge acquisition. Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 145-153.
6. BERRY, D. S., KEAN, K. J., MISOVICH, S. D., & BARON, R. M. (1991). Quantized displays of human movement: A methodological alternative to the point-light display. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 81-97.
7. BUSCHMANN, J.-U., & KRÄMER, N. C. (1999). IKARUS Interaktives Kodier-, Analyse, Rendering- und Simulationsmodul. Software Manual [ICARUS Interactive Coding, Analyzing, and Rendering Utility Software. Software Manual] (Research report). University of Cologne.
8. DAVIS, M. (1972). Understanding body movement: An annotated bibliography. New York: Arno.
9. FREY, S., HIRSBRUNNER, H. P., FLORIN, A., DAW, W., & CRAWFORD, R. (1983). A unified approach to the investigation of nonverbal and verbal behavior in communication research. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (pp. 143-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. FREY, S., & POOL, J. (1976). A new approach to the analysis of visible behavior (Research report). Berne, Switzerland: University of Berne, Department of Psychology.
11. GRAMMER, K., KRUCK, K. B., & MAGNUSSON, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 2-29.
12. HARMON, L. D. (1973). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229, 71-82.
13. HIRSBRUNNER, H. P., FREY, S., & CRAWFORD, R. (1987). Movement in human interaction: Parameter formation and analysis. In A. W. Siegmann & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 99-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. KEMPTER, G. (2000). Trait attribution to reanimated gestural movements. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. KROHNE, H. W., EGLOFF, B., KOHLMANN, C.-W., & TAUSCH, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
16. LEUSCHNER, H. (1999). Vom Videotranskript zur Computeranimation nonverbalen Verhaltens: Methodendokumentation [From video-transcript protocol to computer animation of nonverbal behavior: Method documentation] (Research report). University of Cologne.
17. LEWIS, R. I., DERLEGA, V. J., SHANKAR, A., COCHARD, E., & FINKEL, L. (1997). Nonverbal correlates of confederates' touch: Confounds in touch research. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 821-830.
18. MEHRABIAN, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 359-372.
19. MEHRABIAN, A. (1970). A semantic space for nonverbal behavior. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 35, 248-257.
20. MORRONE, M. C., BURR, D. C., & Ross, J. (1983). Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images. Nature, 305, 226-228.
21. SCHOUWSTRA, S. J., & HOOGSTRATEN, J. (1995). Head position and spinal position as determinants of perceived emotional state. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 81, 673-674.
22. TRAUTNER, H. M. (1991). Children's and adults' awareness of sex-stereotyped postures. Paper presented at the Eleventh Biennial Meeting of the ISSBD, Minneapolis.
23. WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., & TELLEGEN, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.