Assessing state and federal policies to evaluate the quality of teacher preparation programs

Teacher Education Policy in the United States: Issues and Tensions in an Era of Evolving Expectations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 76-105

  Zeichner, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871533861     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Abramson, L. (2010). Study tries to track LA teachers. January 4 edition of All things considered. Retrieved January 10, 2010 from www.npr.org
2. Acheson, K. & Gall, M. (1980). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers. New York: Longman.
3. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (1974). Achieving the potential of performance-based teacher education. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (2010, March). The clinical preparation of teachers: A policy brief. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Bales, B. (2006). Teacher education policies in the United States: The accountability shift since 1980. Teaching and Teacher Education 22, 395-407.
6. Berlak, A. (1010). Coming soon to your favorite credential program: National exit exams. Rethinking schools 25(1). Retrieved August 30, 2010 from www.rethinkingschools.org
7. Berry, B. (2010, May). S trengthening state teacher licensure standards to achieve teaching effectiveness. Washington, DC: Partnership for Teacher Quality. Retrieved June 24, 2010 from www.aacte.org
8. Boyd, D. et al. (2008). Surveying the landscape of teacher education in New York City: Constrained variation and the challenge of innovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30(4), 319-343.
9. Braun, H. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Brennan, J. (1999). Study fi nds teacher licensure tests to be mostly high school level: If this is all we expect teachers to know why send them to college? Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
11. Center for American Progress. (2010). Better teachers, better students: Event proposes ways to measure the effectiveness of teacher training programs. Retrieved August 3, 2010 from www.americanprogress.org
12. Chung Wei, R. & Pecheone, R. (2010). Assessment for learning in preservice teacher education. In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality (pp. 69-132). San Francisco:J ossey-Bass.
13. Cibulka, J. (2009). The redesign of accreditation to inform simultaneous transformation of educator preparation and P-12 schools. Quality Teaching 18(2). Retrieved August 1, 2010 from www.ncate.org
14. Clarke, S. (1969). The story of elementary teacher education models. Journal of Teacher Education 20(3), 283-293.
15. Cochran-Smith, M. & Zeichner, K. (2005) (Eds.). Studying teacher education. New York: Routledge.
16. Conant, J. (1963). The education of American teachers. NewYork: McGraw Hill.
17. Cronin, J.M. (1983). State regulation of teacher preparation. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 171-191). NewYork: Longman.
18. Crowe, E. (2010, July). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
19. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment 3, 1-24.
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (in press). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
22. Darling-Hammond, L. & Baratz-Snowden, J. (Eds.). (2005) A good teacher in every classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Darling-Hammond, L. & Chung Wei, R. (2009). Teacher preparation and teacher learning: The changing policy landscape. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 613-636). NewYork: Routledge.
24. Darling-Hammond, L., Pacheco, A., Michelli, N., LePage, P., Hammerness, K. & Youngs, P. (2005). Implementing curriculum renewal in teacher education: Managing organizational and policy change. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 442-479). San Francisco:J ossey-Bass.
25. Delandshere, G. & Petrosky, A. (2010). The use of portfolios in preservice teacher education. In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality (pp. 9-42). San Francisco: J ossey-Bass.
26. Diez, M. (2010). It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education's impact on student learning. Journal ofTeacher Education 61(5), 441-450.
27. Diez, M. & Haas, J. (1997). No more piecemeal reform: Using performance assessment to rethink teacher education. Action in Teacher Education 19(2), 17-26.
28. Duncan, A. (2009, October). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession. Address given by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University.
29. Earley, P. (2000a) Finding the culprit: Federal policy and teacher education. E ducational Policy 14(1), 25-39.
30. Earley, P. (2000b, February). Guaranteeing the quality of future educators: Report on a survey of teacher warranty programs. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
31. Elsbree, W (1939). The American teacher. NewYork: American Book Co.
32. Fordham Foundation (1999). B etter teachers and how to get more of them. Dayton, OH: Author.
33. Fraser, J. (2007). Preparing America's teachers: A history. NewYork: Teachers College Press.
34. Gage, N. & Winne, P. (1975). Performance-based teacher education. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education (pp. 146-172). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Gitomer, D., Latham, A.S. & Ziomek, R. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
36. Glenn, D. (2010). Education schools are scrutinized for graduates' success as teachers. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved on August 5, 2010 from http://chronicle.com
37. Goldhaber, D. (2007). Everyone's doing it, but does it tell us about teacher effectiveness? Journal of Human Resources 52(4), 765-794.
38. Goldhaber, D. (2010). Licensure tests: Their use and value for increasing teacher quality. In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality (pp. 133-162). San Francisco: J ossey-Bass.
39. Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
40. Hamel, F. & Merz, C. (2005). Reforming accountability: A preservice program wrestles with mandated reform. Journal ofTeacher Education 56(2), 157-167.
41. Harris, D. & McCaffrey, D. (2010).Value added: Assessing teachers' contributions to student achievement. In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality (pp. 251-283). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Heath, R.W. & Nielson, M. (1974). The research base for performance-based teacher education. Review of Educational Research 44(4), 463-484.
43. Hess, F. (2001). Tear down the wall:The case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification.Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
44. Honowar, V. (2007). Gains seen in retooled teacher education. Education Week. Retrieved October 27, 2007 from www.edweek.org
45. Houston, WR. & Howsam, R. (1972). Competency-based teacher education. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
46. Imig, D. & Imig, S. (2008). From traditional certification to competitive certification. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D.J. McIntyre (Eds.), The handbook of research on teacher education, 3rd edition (pp. 886-907). NewYork: Routledge.
47. Johnson, D., Johnson, B., Farenga, S., & Ness, D. (2005). Trivializing teacher education: The accreditation squeeze. Lanham, MD: Roman Littlefield.
48. Kelderman, E. (2010). Teacher-education programs are unaccountable and undemanding report says/ Chronicle of Higher Education, July 29. Retrieved July 30, 2010 from http:// chronicle.com
49. Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormick, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidencebased practice: A conceptual framework. Quality on healthcare, 7, 149-158.
50. Kornfeld, J., Grady, K., Marker, P., & Ruddell, M. (2007). Caught in the current: A self study of state-mandated compliance in a teacher education program. Teachers College Record 109(8), 1902-1930.
51. Levin, H.M. (1980). Teacher certification and the economics of information. Education Evaluation & Policy Analysis 2(4), 5-18.
52. Liston, D. & Zeichner, K. (1991). Teacher education and the social conditions of schooling. New York: Routledge.
53. Lyall, K. & Sell, K. (2006). The true genius of America at risk: Are we losing our public universities to de facto privatization? Westport, CT: Praeger.
54. Matus, R. (2009). State rates teacher prep programs. St. Petersburg Times, November 19. Retrieved January 4, 2010 from www.tampabay.com
55. McCaffrey, D.M., Lockwood, J.R., Mariano, L., & Setodji, C. (2005). Challenges for Value- added assessment of teacher effects. In R. Lissitz (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and applications (pp. 111-144). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
56. McConnery, A.A., Schalock, M.D., & Schalock, H.D. (1998). Focusing improvement and quality assurance: Work samples as authentic performance measures of prospective teachers' effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11, 343-363.
57. Mellon, E. (2010). Colleges slammed over teacher preparation. Houston Chronicle, April 28. Retrieved August 6, 2010 from texas_houstonchronicle_article_apr282010.pdf
58. Mitchell, K., Robinson, D., Plake, B., & Knowles, K. (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59. National Academy of Education (2009). Teacher quality. Retrieved January 2, 2010 from www.naeeducation.org
60. NASDTEC (2010). Retrieved August 22, 2010 from www. nasdtec.org
61. National Council on Teacher Quality (2010, April). Ed school essentials: Evaluating the fundamentals of teacher training programs in Texas. Retrieved on August 6, 2010 from http://www.nctq.org/edschoolreports/texas
62. National Research Council (2010, April). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
63. Neville, K.S., Sherman, R.H., & Cohen, C.E. (2005). Preparing and training professionals: Comparing education to six other fi elds. New York City: The Finance Project. Retrieved January 6, 2007 from www.financeproject.org
64. Newton, S., Walker, L., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Predictive validity of the Performance Assessment for California Teachers. Stanford University: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
65. Noell, G.H. & Burns, J.L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation: An illustration of emerging technology. Journal ofTeacher Education 57(1), 37-50.
66. Pecheone, R. & Chung, R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The performance Assessment for California Teachers.Journal ofTeacher Education 57(1), 22-36.
67. Peck, C., Gallucci, C., & Sloan, T. (2010). Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry. Journal ofTeacher Education 61(5), 451-460.
68. Pianta, R. & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher 38(2), 109-119.
69. Porter, A., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 4th edition (pp. 259-297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
70. Prestine, N. (1989). The struggle for the control of teacher education: A case study. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis 11(3), 285-300.
71. Rennert-Ariev, P. (2008). The hidden curriculum of performance-based teacher education. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 105-138.
72. Rothstein, J. (2010).Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1), 175-214.
73. Simon, A. & Boyer, G. (1974). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments, vol. 3. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
74. Stevens, A. (2007). Survival of the ideas that fit: An evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy and Society 6(1), 25-35.
75. Sykes, G. (2009, March). Fifty years of federal teacher policy: An appraisal. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
76. Sykes, G. & Dibner, K. (March, 2009). Fifty years of federal teacher policy: An appraisal. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
77. U.S. Department of Education (2009, November). The secretary's sixth annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education.
78. Valli, L. & Rennert-Ariev, P. (2002). New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education.Journal of Curriculum Studies 34(2), 201-206.
79. Villegas, A.M. & Davis, D.E. (2008). Preparing teachers of color to confront racial/ethnic disparities in educational outcomes. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D.J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education, 3rd edition (pp. 583-605). New York: Routledge.
80. Walsh, K. (2004). A candidate-centered model for teacher preparation and licensure. In F. Hess, A. Rotherham, & K. Walsh (Eds.), A qualifi ed teacher in every classroom? (pp. 223-254). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
81. Walsh, K., Glaser, D., & Dunne Wilcox, D. (2006, May). What education schools aren't teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren't learning. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
82. Wang, A.H., Coleman, A.B., Coley, R.J., & Phelps, R.P. (2003, May). Preparing teachers around the world. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
83. Wasley, P. & McDiarmid, G.W (2004, June). Connecting the assessment of new teachers to student learning and to teacher preparation. Prepared for the National Commission on Teacher and America's Future Summit on High Quality Teacher Preparation, June 28-30, Austin, TX. Retrieved August 4, 2009 from http://www.nctaf.org/resources/events/2004_ summit-1/documents/Wasley-McDiarmid_Final_-_NCTAF.pdf
84. Wilkerson, J.R. & Lang, WS. (2003). Portfolios, The pied piper of teacher certification assessments: Legal and psychometric issues. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11(45). Retrieved February 12, 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/eppa
85. Wilson, S. (2009). Measuring teacher quality for professional entry. In D.H. Gitomer (Ed.). Measurement issues and assessment for teaching quality. (pp. 8-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86. Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundi, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University ofWashington, College of Education.
87. Wilson, S. & Tamir, E. (2008). The evolving field of teacher education. In M. Cochran- Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D.J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education, 2nd edition (pp. 908-935). NewYork: Routledge.
88. Wilson, S. & Youngs, P. (2005). Research on accountability processes in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 645-736). New York: Routledge.
89. Wisconsin Journal of Education (1863). Examination of teachers. Wisconsin Journal of Education 7, 19.
90. Zeichner, K. (2005). Learning from experience with performance-based teacher education. In F Peterman (Ed), Designing performance assessment systems for urban teacher education (pp. 3-19). NewYork: Routledge.
91. Zeichner, K. (2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 57(3), 326-340.