From traditional certification to competitive certificationl: A twenty-five year retrospective

Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 886-907

  Imig, David G ^a   Imig, Scott R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145830917     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938690-99     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Allen, M. (2000) Two paths to quality teaching: implications for policymakers. Denver, CO:Education Commission of the States.
2. Alvarez, L. (2001, June 15) Senate passes bill for annual tests in public schools. The New York Times, A1.
3. Appleberry, J. (1994) Statement on responsibilities for teacher education. Washington, DC:American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
4. Asera, R. & Chin, E. (2005) Teacher certification: multiple treatment interactions on the body politic. Draft Paper for the International Policy Handbook. Palo Alto, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5. Ballou, D. & Podgursky, M. (1998) The case against teacher certification. National Affairs Inc. The Public Interest.
6. Ballou, D. & Podgursky, M. (2000) Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: continuing the debate. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 5-27.
7. Ballou, D. & Soler, S. (1998) Addressing the looming teacher crunch: the issue is quality. Washington, DC: The Progressive Policy Institute.
8. Beadle, A. (2001) Education conferees prepare for final exam. CQ Daily Monitor, 37(94), 1-3.
9. Berry, B., Darling-Hammond, L., & Hasselkorn, D. (1998) Teacher recruitment, selection and induction: strategies for transforming the teaching profession. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
10. Bingaman, J. (1998) The role the Federal government can play in improving teacher quality. Educational Horizons, 78, 3 (spring), 115-116.
11. Bradley, A. (1999, September 2) States’ uneven teacher supply complicates staffing of schools. Education Week, 17, 1, 7.
12. Bradley, A. (2003, October 8) Federal funding for teacher test. Education Week, 23, 6, 1-17.
13. Bright, K. & Harmeyer, S. (2002) Higher education: activities underway to improve teacher training, but reporting on these activities could be enhanced. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
14. Capital Research Center (1998) Professional teaching standards: a policy brief. NCPA: Washington, DC.
15. Cardman, M. (2001) K-12 bill ready for its closeup with the House. Education Daily, 34(15), 1.
16. Cardman, M. (2003, September 29) Alternative certification groups gets $35M ED grant. Education Daily, 36(181), 1.
17. Cochran-Smith, M. & Fries, M. K. (2001) Sticks, stones, and ideology: the discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15.
18. Cohen, M. & Smith, M. (1993) Goals 2000: Educate America Act. (Draft of March 18.) Washington, DC: U.S. Education Department.
19. Cronin, J. M. (1983) State regulation of teacher preparation. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 171-192). New York, NY: Longman.
20. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996) What matters most: a competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 193-200.
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) Teaching for America’s future: national commissions and vested interests in an almost profession. Educational Policy, 14(1), 162-183.
22. Education Trust (2003) Telling the whole truth (or not) about high school graduation, and telling the whole truth (or not) about highly qualified teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Finn, C. E. (2005, August 25) An obit for ed schools, Gadfly. http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/gadfly/issue.cfm?id=267
24. Finn, C. E. & Madigan, K. (2001) Removing the barriers for teacher candidates. Educational Leadership, 58, 8, 29-31.
25. Fuhrman, S. H. (1994) Politics and systemic education reform, CPRE Policy Briefs. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
26. Futrell, M. H. (2005) The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. In S. Cimburek (ed.), Leading a profession: defining moments in the AACTE agenda, 1980-2005. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
27. Goldhaber, D. D. & Brewer, D. J. (2002) Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 22, 129-146.
28. Goodlad, J. I. (1990) Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
29. Gunderson, S. (2003) Teacher preparation and the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. Arlington, VA: The Greystone Group, Inc.
30. Gursky, D. (1989) Looking for a short-cut. Teacher Magazine (December), 59-64.
31. Haney, W. (2000) The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/.
32. Hanushek, E. A. (1986) The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1147-1177.
33. Hanushek, E. A. (1997) Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
34. Hartocollis, A. (2005, July 31) Who needs education schools? The New York Times.
35. Haycock, K. (1998) Good teaching matters… A lot. Thinking K-12, 3(2), 1-8. Washington, DC:The Education Trust.
36. Herring, M. Y. (2001) At the core of the problem-reforming teacher preparation in Oklahoma. Princeton, NJ: National Association of Scholars.
37. Hess, F. M. (2001) Tear down this wall: the case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
38. Higher Education Amendments of 1998, Conference Report to Accompany H.R. 6, 106th Congress, 2nd Session. (September 25, 1998).
39. Holmes Group (1986) Tomorrow’s teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
40. Izumi, L. & Coburn, K. G. (2001) Facing the classroom challenge: teacher quality and teacher training in California’s schools of education. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
41. Kanstoroom, M. & Finn, C. F., Jr. (eds.) (1999) Better teachers, better schools. Washington, DC:Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
42. Kozloff, M. A. (2001, July 31) A direct and focused approach: necessary conditions for fundamental reform of schools of education. EducationNews.org.
43. Labaree, D. F. (2004) The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44. Learned, W. S., Bagley, W. C., McMurry, C. A., Strayer, G. D., Dearborn, W. F., Kandel, I. L., & Josselyn, H. W. (1920) The professional preparation of teachers for American public schools: a study based upon an examination of tax-supported normal schools in the State of Missouri. New York, NY: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
45. Leigh, A. & Mead, S. (2005) Lifting teacher performance policy report. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
46. Magrath, P. (1998) Community letter. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges.
47. Mathematical Policy Research (2004) The effects of Teach for America on students: findings of a national evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Author.
48. Michelli, N. (2005) Alternative routes to certification. In S. Cimburek (ed.), Leading a profession:defining moments in the AACTE Agenda, 1980-2005. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
49. Milbank, D. (2001, January 24) Bush makes education 1st initiative. Washington Post, 1.
50. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (1992) Promoting systemic change in teacher education and certification. Seattle, WA: Author.
51. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (1999) Manual on the preparation and certification of educational personnel, 1998-1999. Dubuque, IA: Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company.
52. National Center for Education Statistics (1999) Data system for accountability provisions of the Higher Education Amendments of 1998, Title II. Washington, DC: Author.
53. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (1996) What matters most: teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Author.
54. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (2000) NCATE 2000 unit standards. Washington, DC. Author.
55. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.
56. Olson, L. (2003, January 9) The great divide: ensuring a highly qualified teacher for every classroom. Education Week’s Quality Counts, 22(17), 9-18.
57. Paige, R. (2002) Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: the Secretary’s annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
58. Paige, R. (2003) Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
59. Petrilli, M. (1998) Reinventing teacher education. Indianapolis, IN: The Hudson Institute.
60. Rice, J. K. (2003) Teacher quality: understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
61. Riley, R. (1999, February 16) Putting standards of excellence into action (Sixth Annual State of American Education Address). California State University, Long Beach, CA.
62. Rotherham, A. J. & Mead, S. (2003) Back to the future: The history and politics of state teacher licensure and certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
63. Sanders, W. & Horn S. (1998) Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System Database: implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
64. Sanders, W. L. & Rivers, J. C. (1996) Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
65. Scannell, M. M. & Scannell, D. P. (1994) Teacher certification and standards. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.). London: Pergamon, 1994.
66. Splete, A. (1996) Revised draft for the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC). Washington, DC: Council for Independent Colleges.
67. Stinnett T. (1958) The education of teachers: new perspectives. Washington: National Education Association.
68. Strike, K. (1997) Centralized goal formation and systemic reform: reflections on liberty, localism and pluralism. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(11), 1-35.
69. Sykes, G. (1990) Licensure and certification of teachers: an appraisal. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: assessing elementary and secondary teachers (pp. 62-75). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
70. The Teaching Commission (2004) Teaching at risk: a call to action. Report of the Teaching Commission. New York: The Teaching Commission.
71. Walsh, K. (2001) Teacher certification reconsidered: stumbling for quality. Baltimore, MD: Abell Foundation.
72. Wayne, A. J. (2000) Teacher supply and demand: surprises from primary research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 47.
73. The White House. (1997, January 19) Background on President Clinton’s agenda for the nation:State of the Union Address. Washington, DC: Author.
74. Whitehurst, G. (2003) Scientifically-based research on teacher quality: research on teacher preparation and professional development. In Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: the Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality (pp. 39-54). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.