Focusing improvement and quality assurance: Work samples as authentic performance measures of prospective teachers' effectiveness

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 343-363

  Mcconney, Andrew A ^a   Schalock, Mark D ^a   Del Schalock, H ^a  

^a WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649084114     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007974009896     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baker, E. L., Linn, R. L., & Herman, J. L. (1996, Summer). CRESST: A continuing mission to improve educational assessment. Evaluation Comment, 1-23.
2. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
3. Cotton, K. (1995). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis, 1995 update [On-line], http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/esp/esp95.html
4. Cowart, B., Schalock, H. D., & Schalock, M. D. (1990). An outcomes-based and context-embedded theory of teacher effectiveness: Implications for teacher preparation, licensure, and permanent status. Paper presented to the Forty-first Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Philosophy of Education Society, Fort Worth, TX, September 28.
5. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (1993). Accountability and the changing context of teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Creating learner-centered accountability. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.
7. Education Week and Pew Charitable Trusts. (1997). Quality counts: A report card on the condition of public education in the 50 states. [On-line], http://www.edweek.org/qc/
8. Holling, C. S. (1997). Introduction: Times of change. Conservation Ecology [On-line serial], 1(1). http://ww.consecol.org/voll/issl/artl
9. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (D. L. Stufflebeam, chair). (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Koziol, S. M., Minnick, J. B., & Sherman, M. A. (1996). What student teaching evaluation instruments tell us about emphases in teacher education programs. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 53-74.
11. McConney, A., Schalock, M. D., & Schalock, H. D. (1997). Using indicators of student learning in teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 162-192). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
12. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from person's responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
13. Millman, J. (1981). Student achievement as a measure of teaching competence. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 146-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Washington, DC: Author.
15. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
16. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student learning. Washington, DC: Author.
17. Schalock, M. D. (1987). Teacher productivity: What is it? How might it be measured? Can it be warranted? Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 59-62.
18. Schalock, H. D., & Cowart, B. (1993). Document I. Oregon's design for twenty-first century schools and its implications for teachers: A paradigm shift. Monmouth: Division of Continuing Education, Western Oregon State College.
19. Schalock, M. D., Cowart, B., & Staebler, B. (1993). Teacher productivity revisited: Definition, theory, measurement, and application. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 179-196.
20. Schalock, H. D., & Myton, D. M. (1989). A new paradigm for teacher licensure: Oregon's demand for evidence of success in fostering learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 8-16.
21. Schalock, H. D., & Smith, D. (1997). Oregon's design for twenty-first century schools and its implications for teaching and learning. Unpublished monograph, Teaching Research Division, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon.
22. Schalock, H. D., & Schalock, M. D. (1993). Student learning in teacher evaluation and school improvement: An introduction. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 103-104.
23. Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., Cowart, B., & Myton, D. M. (1993). Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 105-134.
24. Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., & Girod, G. (1997). Teacher work sample methodology as used at Western Oregon State College. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 15-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
25. Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., & Myton, D. M. (in press). Effective teachers please, Mr. Wise, quality is not enough. Phi Delta Kappan.
26. Schalock, H. D., Schalock, M. D., Myton, D. M., & Girod, G. (1993). Focusing on learning gains by students taught: A central feature of Oregon's outcome-based approach to the initial preparation and licensure of teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 135-158.
27. Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(2), 151-184.
28. Scriven, M. (1996). Assessment in teacher education: Getting clear on the concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 443-450.
29. Sewall, A. M. (1997, Winter). Accountability and teacher education. National Forum, 77(1), 38-41.
30. Shulman, L. S. (1970). Reconstruction of educational research. Review of Educational Research, 40, 371-396.
31. Stiggins, R. (1995). Assessment literacy for the twenty-first century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238-245.
32. Tellez, K. (1996). Authentic Assessment. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 704-721). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.