Chemosensory learning and flavour: Perception, preference and intake

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 553-559

  Prescott, John ^a  

^a TasteMatters Research and Consulting   (Australia)

Author keywords

Associative learning; Flavour; Hedonic; Intake; Multisensory integration

Indexed keywords

APPETITE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; EMOTION; FLAVOR; GUSTATORY SYSTEM; HUMAN; ODOR; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SMELLING; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASTE;

APPETITE REGULATION; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COGNITION; EATING; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84870676203     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Delwiche J. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Qual Prefer 2004, 15(2):137-146.
2. Brillat-Savarin J.-A. The physiology of taste 1994, ed1825, Penguin Books, London.
3. Prescott J. Flavor as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual Prefer 1999, 10:349-356.
4. Small D.M., Prescott J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 2005, 166:345-357.
5. Small D.M. Crossmodal integration: insights from the chemical senses. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27(3):120-123.
6. Handbook of multisensory processes 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge. G. Calvert, C.B. Spence, B. Stein (Eds.).
7. James W. The principles of psychology. Vol. 1 1890, Holt, New York.
8. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1998, 353:1295-1306.
9. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems 1966, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
10. Sumby W.H., Polack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1954, 26:212-215.
11. Stein B.E., Huneycutt W.S., Meredith M.A. Neurons and behavior: the same rules of multisensory integration apply. Brain Res 1988, 448:355-358.
12. Burdach K.J., Kroeze J.H.A., Koster E.P. Nasal, retronasal, and gustatory perception: an experimental comparison. Percept Psychophys 1984, 36(3):205-208.
13. Frank R.A., Byram J. Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses 1988, 13(3):445-455.
14. Frank R.A., Ducheny K., Mize S.J.S. Strawberry odor, but not red color, enhances the sweetness of sucrose solutions. Chem Senses 1989, 14(3):371-377.
15. Stevenson R.J., Prescott J., Boakes R.A. Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes. Chem Senses 1999, 24(6):627-635.
16. Lawrence G., Salles C., Septier C., Busch J., Thomas-Danguin T. Odour-taste interactions: a way to enhance saltiness in low-salt content solutions. Food Qual Prefer 2009, 20(3):241-248.
17. Delwiche J.F., Heffelfinger A.L. Cross-modal additivity of taste and smell. J Sens Stud 2005, 20:512-525.
18. Djordjevic J., Zatorre R.J., Jones-Gotman M. Effects of perceived and imagined odors on taste detection. Chem Senses 2004, 29:199-208.
19. Prescott J. Psychological processes in flavor perception. Flavor perception 2004, 256-277. Blackwell Publishing, London. A.J. Taylor, D. Roberts (Eds.).
20. White T.L., Prescott J. Chemosensory cross-modal Stroop effects: congruent odors facilitate taste identification. Chem Senses 2007, 32:337-341.
21. Stevenson R.J., Boakes R.A., Prescott J. Changes in odor sweetness resulting from implicit learning of a simultaneous odor-sweetness association: an example of learned synesthesia. Learn Motiv 1998, 29:113-132.
22. Stevenson R.J., Prescott J., Boakes R.A. The acquisition of taste properties by odors. Learn Motiv 1995, 26:1-23.
23. Yeomans M.R., Mobini S., Elliman T.D., Walker H.C., Stevenson R.J. Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2006, 32(3):215-228.
24. Yeomans M.R., Prescott J., Gould N.G. Individual differences in responses to tastes determine hedonic and perceptual changes to odours following odour/taste conditioning. Q J Exp Psychol 2009, 62(8):1648-1664.
25. Sundquist N., Stevenson R.J., Bishop I.R.J. Can odours acquire fat-like properties?. Appetite 2006, 47:91-99.
26. Schifferstein H.N.J., Verlegh P.W.J. The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychol 1996, 94:87-105.
27. Frank R.A., van der Klaauw N.J., Schifferstein H.N.J. Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste-odor and taste-taste interactions. Percept Psychophys 1993, 54(3):343-354.
28. Driver J., Spence C. Multisensory perception: beyond modularity and convergence. Curr Biol 2000, 10:R731-R735.
29. Rozin P. "Taste-smell confusions" and the duality of the olfactory sense. Percept Psychophys 1982, 31(4):397-401.
30. von Bekesy G. Olfactory analogue to directional hearing. J Appl Physiol 1964, 19:369-373.
31. Sakai N., Kobayakawa T., Gotow N., Saito S., Imada S. Enhancement of sweetness ratings of aspartame by a vanilla odor presented either by orthonasal or retronasal routes. Percept Mot Skills 2001, 92:1002-1008.
32. Pfieffer J.C., Hollowood T.A., Hort J., Taylor A.J. Temporal synchrony and integration of sub-threshold taste and smell signals. Chem Senses 2005, 30:539-545.
33. Kobayakawa T., Toda H., Gotow N. Synchronicity judgement of gustation and olfaction. Association for Chemoreception Sciences 2009, Sarasota, FL.
34. Spence C., Parise C. Prior-entry: a review. Conscious Cogn 2010, 19:364-379.
35. Lim J., Green B.G. Tactile interaction with taste localization: influence of gustatory quality and intensity. Chem Senses 2008, 33:137-143.
36. Todrank J., Bartoshuk L.M. A taste illusion: taste sensation localised by touch. Physiol Behav 1991, 50:1027-1031.
37. Small D.M., Gerber J.C., Mak Y.E., Hummel T. Differential neural responses evoked by orthonasal versus retronasal odorant perception in humans. Neuron 2005, 47:593-605.
38. Pierce J., Halpern B. Orthonasal and retronasal odorant identification based upon vapor phase input from common substances. Chem Senses 1996, 21(5):529-543.
39. Voirol E., Daget N. Comparative study of nasal and retronasal olfactory perception. Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 1986, 19:316-319.
40. Steiner J.E., Glaser D., Hawilo M.E., Berridge K.C. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001, 25(1):53-74.
41. Zellner D.A., Rozin P., Aron M., Kulish C. Conditioned enhancement of human's liking for flavor by pairing with sweetness. Learn Motiv 1983, 14:338-350.
42. Baeyens F., Eelen P., Van den Bergh O., Crombez G. Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learn Motiv 1990, 21:434-455.
43. Levey A.B., Martin I. Classical conditioning of human 'evaluative' responses. Behav Res Ther 1975, 13:221-226.
44. Yeomans M.R., Mobini S. Hunger alters the expression of acquired hedonic but not sensory qualities of food-paired odors in humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2006, 32(4):460-466.
45. Pangborn R.M. Individual variation in affective responses to taste stimuli. Psychon Sci 1970, 21(2):125-126.
46. De Houwer J., Thomas S., Baeyens F. Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychol Bull 2001, 127(6):853-869.
47. Clark C.C., Lawless H.T. Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect. Chem Senses 1994, 19(6):583-594.
48. van der Klaauw N.J., Frank R.A. Scaling component intensities of complex stimuli: the influence of response alternatives. Environ Int 1996, 22(1):21-31.
49. Frank R.A. Response context affects judgments of flavor components in foods and beverages. Food Qual Prefer 2003, 14:139-145.
50. McBurney D.H. Taste, smell, and flavor terminology: taking the confusion out of fusion. Clinical measurement of taste and smell 1986, 117-125. Macmillan, New York. H.L. Meiselman, R.S. Rivkin (Eds.).
51. Bingham A.F., Birch G.G., De Graaf C., Behan J.M., Perring K.D. Sensory studies with sucrose-maltol mixtures. Chem Senses 1990, 15(4):447-456.
52. Treisman A. How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Vis Cogn 2006, 14:411-443.
53. Prescott J., Johnstone V., Francis J. Odor/taste interactions: effects of different attentional strategies during exposure. Chem Senses 2004, 29:331-340.
54. Stevenson R.J., Case T.I. Preexposure to the stimulus elements, but not training to detect them, retards human odour-taste learning. Behav Proc 2003, 61:13-25.
55. Le Berre E., Thomas-Danguin T., Beno N., Coureaud G., Etievant P., Prescott J. Perceptual processing strategy and exposure influence the perception of odor mixtures. Chem Senses 2008, 33:193-199.
56. Prescott J., Murphy S. Inhibition of evaluative and perceptual odour-taste learning by attention to the stimulus elements. Q J Exp Psychol 2009, 62:2133-2140.
57. Prescott J., Lee S.M., Kim K.O. Analytic approaches to evaluation modify hedonic responses. Food Qual Prefer 2011, 22(4):391-393.
58. Nordgren L.F., Dijksterhuis A.P. The devil is in the deliberation: thinking too much reduces preference consistency. J Consum Res 2008, 36:39-46.
59. Halberstadt J., Hooton K. The affect disruption hypothesis: the effect of analytic thought on the fluency and appeal of art. Cogn Emot 2008, 22(5):964-976.
60. Nordgren L.F., Dijksterhuis A.P. The devil is in the deliberation: thinking too much reduces preference consistency. J Consum Res 2009, 36:39-46.
61. Wilson T.D., Lisle D., Schooler J., Hodges S.D., Klaaren K.J., LaFleur S.J. Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1993, 19:331-339.
62. Myers K.P., Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Physiol Behav 2001, 74:481-493.
63. Prescott J. Effects of added glutamate on liking for novel food flavors. Appetite 2004, 42(2):143-150.
64. Yeomans M.R., Leitch M., Gould N.J., Mobini S. Differential hedonic, sensory and behavioral changes associated with flavor-nutrient and flavor-flavor learning. Physiol Behav 2008, 93:798-806.
65. Kern D.L., McPhee L., Fisher J., Johnson S., Birch L.L. The postingestive consequences of fat condition preferences for flavors associated with high dietary fat. Physiol Behav 1993, 54:71-76.
66. Mobini S., Chambers L.C., Yeomans M.R. Interactive effects of flavor-flavor and flavor-consequence learning in development of liking for sweet-paired flavors in humans. Appetite 2007, 48:20-28.
67. Winkielman P., Berridge K.C. Irrational wanting and subrational liking: how rudimentary motivational and affective processes shape preferences and choices. Polit Psychol 2003, 24(4):657-679.
68. Yeomans M.R., Gould N., Mobini S., Prescott J. Acquired flavor acceptance and intake facilitated by monosodium glutamate in humans. Physiol Behav 2008, 93:958-966.
69. Nisbett R.E. Taste, deprivation, and weight determinants of eating behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1968, 10(2):107-116.
70. Hofmann W., van Koningsbruggen G.M., Stroebe W., Ramanathan S., Aarts H. As pleasure unfolds: hedonic responses to tempting food. Psychol Sci 2010, 21(12):1863-1870.
71. Rolls E.T., Rolls J.H. Olfactory sensory-specific satiety in humans. Physiol Behav 1997, 61(3):461-473.
72. Labbe D., Damevin L., Vaccher C., Morgenegg C., Martin N. Modulation of perceived taste by olfaction in familiar and unfamiliar beverages. Food Qual Prefer 2006, 17:582-589.
73. Girgis S., Neal B., Prescott J., Prendergast J., Dumbrell S., Turner C., et al. A one-quarter reduction in the salt content of bread can be made without detection. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003, 57(4):616-620.
74. Dalton P., Doolittle N., Nagaat H., Breslin P.A.S. The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nat Neuro 2000, 3(5):431-432.