Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation

F1000 Biology Reports

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Webster, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER; HUMAN; REVIEW; SENSORY NERVE CELL; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 84870413095     PISSN: 17404118     EISSN: 1757594X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3410/B4-21     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Webster MA: Adaptation and visual coding. J Vis 2011, 11(3):1-23.
2. Clifford CW, Webster MA, Stanley GB, Stocker AA, Kohn A, Sharpee TO, Schwartz O: Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Research 2007, 47:3125-31. (Pubitemid 350060972)
3. Gibson JJ, Radner M: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:453-67.
4. Wohlgemuth A: On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement 1911, 1:1-117.
5. Stockman A, Langendorfer M, Smithson HE, Sharpe LT: Human cone light adaptation: from behavioral measurements to molecular mechanisms. J Vis 2006, 6:1194-213. (Pubitemid 44710275)
6. Graham NV: Visual Pattern Analyzers. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
7. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 1968, 195:215-43.
8. Blake R, Overton R, Lema-Stern S: Interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1981, 7:367-81.
9. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC: Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1991, 1:1-47.
10. Clifford CWG, Rhodes G: Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
11. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V: Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94. (Pubitemid 32095531)
12. Webster MA, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P: Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428:557-61. (Pubitemid 38480538)
13. Jordan H, Fallah M, Stoner GR: Adaptation of gender derived from biological motion. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:738-9.
14. Troje NF, Sadr J, Geyer H, Nakayama K: Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:850-7. (Pubitemid 44159203)
15. Fang F, He S: Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 2005, 45:793-800. (Pubitemid 40320711)
16. Greene MR, Oliva A: High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2010, 36:1430-42.
17. Motoyoshi I, Nishida S, Sharan L, Adelson EH: Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 2007, 447:206-9. (Pubitemid 46763075)
18. Suzuki S: High-level pattern coding revealed by brief shape aftereffects. In Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Volume 2. Edited by Clifford C, Rhodes G. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
19. von der Heydt R, Macuda T, Qiu FT: Border-ownership-dependent tilt aftereffect. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2005, 22:2222-9. (Pubitemid 41715831)
20. Webster MA, MacLeod DIA: Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011, 366:1702-25.
21. Clifford CWG: Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:136-43.
22. Zaidi Q, Ennis R, Cao D, Lee B: Neural locus of color afterimages. Curr Biol 2012, 22:220-4.
23. Kohn A, Movshon JA: Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 39:681-91. (Pubitemid 36993584)
24. Xu H, Dayan P, Lipkin RM, Qian N: Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:3374-83. (Pubitemid 351469324)
25. Dickinson JE, Almeida RA, Bell J, Badcock DR: Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. J Vis 2010, 10:5.
26. Gollisch T, Meister M: Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina. Neuron 2010, 65:150-64.
27. Olveczky BP, Baccus SA, Meister M: Retinal adaptation to object motion. Neuron 2007, 56:689-700. (Pubitemid 350102032)
28. Hosoya T, Baccus SA, Meister M: Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 2005, 436:71-7. (Pubitemid 40966187)
29. Chubb C, Sperling G, Solomon JA: Texture interactions determine perceived contrast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989, 86:9631-5. (Pubitemid 20010482)
30. Afraz A, Cavanagh P: The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(10):11-7.
31. Watson TL, Clifford CWG: Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception 2003, 32:1109-16. (Pubitemid 37550990)
32. Ghuman AS, McDaniel JR, Martin A: Face Adaptation without a Face. Current Biology 2010, 20:32-6.
33. Winawer J, Huk AC, Boroditsky L: A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychol Sci 2008, 19:276-83.
34. Dils AT, Boroditsky L: Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:16396-400.
35. Bestelmeyer PEG, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Perrett DI, Schneider A, Welling LLM, Conway CA: Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 2008, 107:353-65. (Pubitemid 351375188)
36. Rotshtein P, Henson RN, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ: Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:107-13. (Pubitemid 41236739)
37. Moradi F, Koch C, Shimojo S: Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 2005, 45:169-75. (Pubitemid 40075358)
38. He D, Kersten D, Fang F: Opposite modulation of high- and low-level visual aftereffects by perceptual grouping. Current Biology 2012, 22:1040-5.
39. Carandini M, Heeger DJ: Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011, 13:51-62.
40. Valentine T, Endo M: Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1992, 44:671-703.
41. Blakemore C, Campbell FW: On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 1969, 203:237-60.
42. Webster MA: Human colour perception and its adaptation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 1996, 7:587-634. (Pubitemid 126717010)
43. Rhodes G, Robbins R, Jaquet E, McKone E, Jeffery L, Clifford CWG: Adaptation and face perception - how aftereffects implicate norm based coding of faces. In Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision. Edited by Clifford CWG, Rhodes G. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:213-40.
44. Robbins R, McKone E, Edwards M: Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:570-92.
45. Rhodes G, Jeffery L: Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 2006, 46:2977-87. (Pubitemid 43929045)
46. Webster MA, MacLin OH: Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:647-53.
47. Zhao C, Series P, Hancock PJ, Bednar JA: Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects. Vision Res 2011, 51:2021-30.
48. Storrs KH, Arnold DK: Not all face aftereffects are equal. Vision Research in press.
49. Hegde J: How reliable is the pattern adaptation technique? A modeling study. J Neurophysiol 2009, 102:2245-52.
50. Mur M, Ruff DA, Bodurka J, Bandettini PA, Kriegeskorte N: Faceidentity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity. Cereb Cortex 2010, 20:2027-42.
51. Barlow HB: A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects. In Visual Coding and Efficiency. Edited by Blakemore C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:363-75.
52. Elliott SL, Georgeson MA, Webster MA: Response normalization and blur adaptation: Data and multi-scale model. J Vis 2011, 11.
53. Kohn A: Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97:3155-64.
54. Chopin A, Mamassian P: Predictive properties of visual adaptation. Curr Biol 22:622-6.
55. Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD: Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature 1982, 298:266-8. (Pubitemid 12089408)
56. Greenlee MW, Heitger F: The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Res 1988, 28:791-7.
57. McDermott KC, Malkoc G, Mulligan JB, Webster MA: Adaptation and visual salience. J Vis 2010, 10:17.
58. Ranganath C, Rainer G: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4:193-202. (Pubitemid 37280184)
59. Foster DH: Color constancy. Vision Res 2011, 51:674-700.
60. Wark B, Lundstrom BN, Fairhall A: Sensory adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007, 17:423-9. (Pubitemid 47531945)
61. Wainwright MJ: Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res 1999, 39:3960-74.
62. Sharpee TO, Sugihara H, Kurgansky AV, Rebrik SP, Stryker MP, Miller KD: Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature 2006, 439:936-42. (Pubitemid 43292406)
63. Laughlin S: A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z Naturforsch C 1981, 36:910-2.
64. Rieke F, Rudd ME: The challenges natural images pose for visual adaptation. Neuron 2009, 64:605-16.
65. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A: Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1982, 216:427-59. (Pubitemid 13218774)
66. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA: Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001, 24:1193-216. (Pubitemid 32695258)
67. Barlow HB, Macleod DI, van Meeteren A: Adaptation to gratings: no compensatory advantages found. Vision Research 1976, 16:1043-5.
68. Clifford CWG, Wyatt AM, Arnold DH, Smith ST, Wenderoth P: Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Research 2001, 41:151-9. (Pubitemid 32332840)
69. Westheimer G, Gee A: Orthogonal adaptation and orientation discrimination. Vision Research 2002, 42:2339-43. (Pubitemid 35279168)
70. Rhodes G, Watson TL, Jeffery L, Clifford CW: Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces. Vision Research 2010, 50:963-8.
71. Ng M, Boynton GM, Fine I: Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(1):1-20.
72. Armann R, Jeffery L, Calder AJ, Rhodes G: Race-specific norms for codingfaceidentityandafunctionalrolefornorms. J Vis 2011, 11:9.
73. Susilo T, McKone E, Edwards M: What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research 2010, 50:300-14.
74. Dennett H, Susilo T, McKone E: Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability. Psychological Science in press.
75. Ringach DL, Malone BJ: The operating point of the cortex: neurons as large deviation detectors. J Neurosci 2007, 27:7673-83. (Pubitemid 47093814)
76. Zhang P, Bao M, Kwon M, He S, Engel SA: Effects of orientation-specific visual deprivation induced with altered reality. Curr Biol 2009, 19:1956-60.
77. Kwon M, Legge GE, Fang F, Cheong AM, He S: Adaptive changes in visual cortex following prolonged contrast reduction. J Vis 2009, 9(20):1-16.
78. Neitz J, Carroll J, Yamauchi Y, Neitz M, Williams DR: Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults. Neuron 2002, 35:783-92. (Pubitemid 35223036)
79. Belmore SC, Shevell SK: Very-long-term and short-term chromatic adaptation: are their influences cumulative? Vision Res 2010, 51:362-6.
80. Vul E, Krizay E, MacLeod DI: The McCollough effect reflects permanent and transient adaptation in early visual cortex. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(4):1-12.
81. Bao M, Engel SA: Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:5898-903.
82. Kording KP, Tenenbaum JB, Shadmehr R: The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:779-86. (Pubitemid 46828507)
83. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R: Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 2006, 4:e179.
84. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW: Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 2010, 33:89-108.
85. Wark B, Fairhall A, Rieke F: Timescales of inference in visual adaptation. Neuron 2009, 61:750-61.
86. Yehezkel O, Sagi D, Sterkin A, Belkin M, Polat U: Learning to adapt: Dynamics of readaptation to geometrical distortions. Vision Res 2010, 50:1550-8.
87. van Lier R, Vergeer M, Anstis S: Filling-in afterimage colors between the lines. Curr Biol 2009, 19:R323-4.
88. [http://www.johnsadowski.com/big-spanish-castle.php]