Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "Release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2027-2042

  Mur, Marieke ^a,b   Ruff, Douglas A ^a,c   Bodurka, Jerzy ^a,d   Bandettini, Peter A ^a   Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ^a,e  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH   (United States)

^e MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

attention; face identity; fMRI adaptation; fusiform face area; neuronal representation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGEN LEVEL DEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; BRAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; FACE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; NERVE CELL; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL FACE AREA; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FACE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77955934165     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp272     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aguirre GK. 2007. Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. Neuroimage. 35:1480-1494.
2. Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M. 1999. Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain. 122:1613-1628.
3. Andrews TJ, Ewbank MP. 2004. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage. 23:905-913.
4. Anzai A, Peng X, Van Essen DC. 2007. Neurons in monkey visual area V2 encode combinations of orientations. Nat Neurosci. 10:1313-1321.
5. Avidan G, Hasson U, Hendler T, Zohary E, Malach R. 2002. Analysis of the neuronal selectivity underlying low fMRI signals. Curr Biol. 12:964-972.
6. Avidan G, Hasson U, Malach R, Behrmann M. 2005. Detailed exploration of face-processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 2. Functional neuroimaging findings. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:1150-1167.
7. Bentin S, Moscovitch M. 1988. The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces. J Exp Psychol Gen. 117:148-160.
8. Bentin S, Peled BS. 1990. The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Mem Cognit. 18:359-366.
9. Bernard FA, Bullmore ET, Graham KS, Thompson SA, Hodges JR, Fletcher PC. 2004. The hippocampal region is involved in successful recognition of remote and recent famous faces. Neuroimage. 22:1704-1714.
10. Blanz V, Vetter T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 187-194
11. Bodurka J, Ledden P, van Gelderen P, Chu R, de Zwart JA, Duyn J. 2004. Scalable multichannel MRI data acquisition system. Magn Reson Med. 51:165-171.
12. Bodurka J, Ye F, Petridou N, Murphy KM, Bandettini P. 2007. Mapping the MRI voxel volume in which thermal noise matches physiological noise\implications for fMRI. Neuroimage. 34:542-549.
13. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ. 1996. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci. 16:4207-4221.
14. Boynton GM, Finney EM. 2003. Orientation-specific adaptation in visual cortex. J Neurosci. 23:8781-8787.
15. Bruce V, Young A. 1986. Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol. 77:305-327.
16. Chao LL, Weisberg J, Martin A. 2002. Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb Cortex. 12:545-551.
17. Dobbins IG, Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Schacter DL. 2004. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature. 428:316-319.
18. Dougherty RF, Koch VM, Brewer AA, Fischer B, Modersitzki J, Wandell BA. 2003. Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. J Vis. 3:586-598.
19. Dricot L, Sorger B, Schiltz C, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2008a. The roles of "face" and "non-face" areas during individual face perception: evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient. Neuroimage. 40:318-332.
20. Dricot L, Sorger B, Schiltz C, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2008b. Evidence for individual face discrimination in non-face selective areas of the visual cortex in acquired prosopagnosia. Behav Neurol. 19:75-79.
21. Eger E, Henson RNA, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2004. BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J Neurophysiol. 92:1241-1247.
22. Eger E, Schweinberger SR, Dolan RJ, Henson RN. 2005. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage. 26:128-1139.
23. Epstein R, Graham KS, Downing PE. 2003. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron. 37:865-876.
24. Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N. 1999. The parahippocam-pal place area: recognition, navigation or encoding? Neuron. 23:115-125.
25. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 392:598-601.
26. Epstein RA, Parker WE, Feiler AM. 2008. Two kinds of fMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms. J Neuro-physiol. 99:2877-2886.
27. Evans JJ, Heggs AJ, Antoun N, Hodges JR. 1995. Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain. 118:1-13.
28. Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D, He S. 2005. Orientation-tuned fMRI adaptation in human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 94:4188-4195.
29. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore JD, Anderson AW. 2000. The fusiform 'face area' is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:495-504.
30. Gegenfurtner KR, Kiper DC, Levitt JB. 1997. Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. J Neurophysiol. 77:1906-1923.
31. George N, Dolan RJ, Fink GR, Baylis GC, Russell C, Driver J. 1999. Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus. Nat Neurosci. 2:574-580.
32. Gobbini MI, Leibenluft E, Santiago N, Haxby JV. 2004. Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuro-image. 22:1628-1635.
33. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. 2001. fMRI-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. 107:293-321.
34. Grill-Spector K, Knouf N, Kanwisher N. 2004. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat Neurosci. 75:555-562.
35. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
36. Gorno Tempini ML, Price CJ, Josephs O, Vandenberghe R, Cappa SF, Kapur N, Frackowiak RSJ. 1998. The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain. 121:2103-2118.
37. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 4:223-233.
38. Hegde J, Van Essen DC. 2000. Selectivity for complex shapes in primate visual area V2. J Neurosci. 20:RC61.
39. Henson RN, Mouchlianitis E. 2007. Effect of spatial attention on stimulus-specific haemodynamic repetition effects. Neuroimage. 35:1317-1329.
40. Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. 2000. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science. 287:1269-1272.
41. Henson RNA, Shallice T, Gorno-Tempini ML, Dolan RJ. 2002. Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 12:178-186.
42. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 195:215-243.
43. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. 1997. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 17:4302-4311.
44. Krekelberg B, Boynton GM, van Wezel RJA. 2006. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signal. Trends Neurosci. 29:250-256.
45. Kriegeskorte N, Formisano E, Sorger B, Goebel R. 2007. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:20600-20605.
46. Leveroni CL, Seidenberg M, Mayer AR, Mead LA, Binder JR, Rao SM. 2000. Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. J Neurosci. 20:878-886.
47. Levitt JB, Kiper DC, Movshon JA. 1994. Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. J Neurophysiol. 71:2517-2542.
48. Liu T, Pestilli F, Carrasco M. 2005. Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and fMRI response in human visual cortex. Neuron. 45:469-477.
49. Loffler G, Gordon GE, Wilkinson F, Goren D, Wilson HR. 2005. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face-perception. Vis Res. 45:2287-2297.
50. Marotta JJ, Genovese CR, Behrmann M. 2001. A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia. Neuroreport. 12:1581-1587.
51. Mazard A, Schiltz C, Rossion B. 2006. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 44:912-922.
52. Mueller JR, Metha AB, Krauskopf J, Lennie P. 1999. Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science. 285:1405-1408.
53. Muckli L, Kohler A, Kriegeskorte N, Singer W. 2005. Primary visual cortex activity along the apparent-motion trace reflects illusory perception. PLoS Biol. 3:e265.
54. Murray SO, Wojciulik E. 2004. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci. 7:70-74.
55. Movshon JA, Lennie P. 1979. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature. 278:850-852.
56. Ng M, Ciaramitaro VM, Anstis S, Boynton GM, FineI.2006.Selectivity for the configural cues that identify gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in humancortex.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA.103:19552-19557.
57. O'Craven KM, Downing PE, Kanwisher N. 1999. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature. 401:584-587.
58. Pourtois G, Schwartz S, Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Vuilleumier P. 2005. Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:1043-1057.
59. Puce A, Allison T, Gore JC, McCarthy G. 1995. Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. J Neuro-physiol. 74:1192-1199.
60. Reichardt W. 1969. Movement perception in insects. In: Reichardt W, editor. Processing of optical data by organisms and by machines. New York: Academic Press.
61. Rotshtein P, Henson RNA, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2005. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 81:107-113.
62. Sato N, Nakamura K. 2003. Visual response properties of neurons in the parahippocampal cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 90:876-886.
63. Sawamura H, Orban GA, Vogels R. 2006. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron. 49:307-318.
64. Schiltz C, Sorger B, Caldara R, Ahmed F, Mayer E, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2006. Impaired face discrimination in acquired prosopagnosia is associated with abnormal response to individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus. Cereb Cortex. 16:574-586.
65. Sergent J, Ohta S, MacDonald B. 1992. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. Brain. 115:15-36.
66. Sugiura M, Kawashima R, Nakamura K, Sato N, Nakamura A, Kato T, Hatano K, Schormann T, Zilles K, Sato K, et al. 2001. Activation reduction in anterior temporal cortices during repeated recognition of faces of personal acquaintances. Neuroimage. 13: 877-890.
67. Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.
68. Tolias AS, Keliris GA, Smirknakis SM, Logothetis NK. 2005. Neurons in macaque area V4 acquire directional tuning after adaptation to motion stimuli. Nat Neurosci. 8:591-593.
69. Tootell RBH, Hadjikhani NK, Vanduffel W, Liu AK, Mendola JD, Sereno MI, Dale AM. 1998. Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:811-817.
70. Tsao DY, Freiwald WA, Tootell RBH, Livingstone MS. 2006. A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science. 311:670-674.
71. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2002. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci. 5:491-499.
72. Williams MA, Baker CI, Op de Beeck HP, Shim WM, Dang S, Triantafyllou C, Kanwisher N. 2008. Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex. Nat Neurosci. 11:1439-1445.
73. Williams MA, Berberovic N, Mattingley JB. 2007. Abnormal fMRI adaptation to unfamiliar faces in a case of developmental prosopamnesia. Curr Biol. 17:1259-1264.
74. Winston JS, Henson RNA, Fine-Goulden MR, Dolan RJ. 2004. fMRI-Adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J Neurophysiol. 92: 1830-1839.
75. Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N, Driver J. 1998. Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 79:1574-1578.
76. Yovel G, Kanwisher N. 2005. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr Biol. 15:2256-2262.