High-Level Aftereffects to Global Scene Properties

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1430-1442

  Greene, Michelle R ^a   Oliva, Aude ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftereffects; Gist; Global property; Natural images; Scene recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COLOR VISION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 78650159738     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019058     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Afraz S., Cavanagh P. Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Research 2008, 48:42-54.
2. Appelton J. The experience of landscape 1975, Wiley, London.
3. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 1954, 61:183-193.
4. Baddeley R. The correlational structure of natural images and the calibration of spatial representations. Cognitive Science 1997, 21:351-371.
5. Barlow H.B. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Sensory communication 1961, 217-234. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.).
6. Bell A.H., Hadj-Bouziane F., Frihauf J.B., Tootell R.B.H., Ungerleider L.G. Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101:688-700.
7. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:443-446.
8. Clifford C.W.G., Webster M., Stanley G., Stocker A., Kohn A., Sharpee T., Schwartz O. Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Research 2007, 47:3125-3131.
9. Clifford C.W., Wenderoth P., Spehar B. A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2000, 267:1705-1710.
10. Durgin F.H., Huk A.C. Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artifical and natural textures. Vision Research 1997, 37:3273-3282.
11. Fang F., Ijichi K., He S. Transfer of the face viewpoint aftereffect from adaptation to different and inverted faces. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(13):1-9.
12. Fei-Fei L., Iyer A., Koch C., Perona P. What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(1):1-29.
13. Fei-Fei L., Perona P. A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. IEEE Proceedings in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2005, 2:524-531.
14. Fox C.J., Barton J.J. What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Research 2007, 1127:80-89.
15. Gattass R., Sousa A., Gross C. Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 1988, 8:1831-1845.
16. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
17. Greene M.R., Oliva A. The briefest of glances: The time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science 2009, 20:464-472.
18. Greene M.R., Oliva A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58:137-176.
19. Gross C.G. Visual functions of inferotemporal cortex. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII, Part 3B 1973, 451-482. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. R. Jung (Ed.).
20. Gross C., Rocha-Miranda C., Bender D. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology 1972, 35:96-111.
21. Intraub H. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:604-610.
22. Ito M., Tamura H., Fujita I., Tanaka K. Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73:218-226.
23. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A. Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science 2006, 17:493-500.
24. Joubert O., Rousselet G., Fize D., Fabre-Thorpe M. Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference. Vision Research 2007, 47:3286-3297.
25. Kaping D., Tzvetanov T., Treue S. Adaptation to statistical properties of visual scenes biases rapid categorization. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:12-19.
26. Kaplan S. Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. The adaptive mind 1992, 535-552. Oxford University Press, New York. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.).
27. Konkle T., Wang Q., Hayward V., Moore C.I. Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision. Current Biology 2009, 19:1-6.
28. Krauskopf J. The magnitude of figural after-effects as a function of the duration of the test period. American Journal of Psychology 1954, 67:684-690.
29. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Müller K., Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 2005, 272:897-904. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3022.
30. Leopold D., O'Toole A., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
31. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:476-490.
32. Melcher D. Spatiotopic transfer of visual-form adaptation across saccadic eye movements. Current Biology 2005, 15:1745-1748.
33. Motoyoshi I., Nishida S., Sharan L., Adelson E. Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature 2007, May 10, 447:206-209.
34. Oliva A., Schyns P. Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:176-210.
35. Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision 2001, 42:145-175.
36. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
37. Potter M.C. Meaning in visual search. Science 1975, March 14, 187:965-966.
38. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T., Clifford C.W., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566.
39. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Clifford C.W.G., Leopold D.A. The timecourse of higher-level Face aftereffects. Vision Research 2007, 47:2291-2296.
40. Rhodes G., Robbins R., Jaquet E., McKone E., Jeffery L., Clifford C.W.G. Adaptation and face perception: How aftereffects implicate norm-based coding of faces. Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision 2005, 213-240. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. C.W.G. Clifford, G. Rhodes (Eds.).
41. Robbins R., McKone E., Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:570-592.
42. Rousselet G.A., Joubert O.R., Fabre-Thorpe M. How long to get to the " gist" of real-world natural scenes?. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:852-877.
43. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1315-1341.
44. Torralba A., Oliva A. Depth estimation from image structure. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2002, 24:1226-1238.
45. Torralba A., Oliva A. Statistics of natural images categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2003, 14:391-412.
46. Troje N.F., Sadr J., Geyer H., Nakayama K. Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:850-857.
47. Tversky B., Hemenway K. Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology 1983, 15:121-149.
48. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1991, 43(A):161-204.
49. Vogel J., Schiele B. Semantic scene modeling and retrieval for content-based image retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision 2007, 72:133-157.
50. Wade N., Verstraten F. Accommodating the past: A selective history of adaptation. Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision 2005, 83-102. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. C.W.G. Clifford, G. Rhodes (Eds.).
51. Wainwright M. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Research 1999, 39:3960-3974.
52. Walker Renninger L., Malik J. When is scene identification just texture recognition?. Vision Research 2004, 44:2301-2311.
53. Webster M.A. Human colour perception and its adaptation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 1996, 7:587-634.
54. Webster M., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural face categories. Nature 2004, April 1, 428:557-561.
55. Webster M.A., Miyahara E. Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images. Journal of the Optical Society of America: Optics, Image Science, and Vision 1997, 14(A):2355-2366.
56. Winawer J., Huk A., Boroditsky L. A motion aftereffect from viewing still photographs depicting motion. Psychological Science 2008, 19:276-283.
57. Wolfe J.M. Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects. Vision Research 1984, 24:1959-1964.
58. Xu H., Dayan P., Lipkin R.M., Qian N. Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:3374-3383.