Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt after effects

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 2021-2030

  Zhao, Chen ^a   Seriès, Peggy ^a   Hancock, Peter J B ^b   Bednar, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aftereffects; Computational modeling; Face recognition; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE GENDER AFTEREFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TILT AFTEREFFECT; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052658466     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Afraz S.-R., Cavanagh P. Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vision Research 2008, 48(1):42-54.
2. Bednar J.A., Miikkulainen R. Tilt aftereffects in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex. Neural Computation 2000, 12(7):1721-1740.
3. Burkhardt A., Blaha L.M., Jurs B.S., Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Wyatte D., et al. Adaptation modulates the electrophysiological substrates of perceived facial distortion: Support for opponent coding. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(13):3743-3756.
4. Calder A.J., Jenkins R., Cassel A., Clifford C.W.G. Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. Journal of Experimental Psychology - General 2008, 137(2):244-261.
5. Chen J., Yang H., Wang A., Fang F. Perceptual consequences of face viewpoint adaptation: Face viewpoint aftereffect, changes of differential sensitivity to face view, and their relationship. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):12.1-12.11.
6. Gibson J., Radner M. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:453-467.
7. Jeffery L., Mckone E., Haynes R., Firth E. Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(5). 18, 1-19.
8. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: Physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97(5):3155-3164.
9. Laming D. The measurement of sensation. Oxford psychology series 1997, Oxford University Press.
10. Leopold D.A., Bondar I.V., Giese M.A. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 2006, 442(7102):572-575.
11. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(1):89-94.
12. Little A.C., Debruine L.M., Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 2005, 272(1578):2283-2287.
13. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(10):1386-1390.
14. Mitchell D.E., Muir D.W. Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian?. Vision Research 1976, 16(6):609-613.
15. Oruç İ., Barton J.J.S. A novel face aftereffect based on recognition contrast thresholds. Vision Research 2010, 1-10.
16. Oruç İ., Guo X.M., Barton J.J.S. Gender in facial representations: A contrast-based study of adaptation within and between the sexes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(1):e16251.
17. Penton-Voak I., Pound N., Little A., Perrett D. Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a kernel of truth" in social perception. Social Cognition 2006, 24(5):607-640.
18. Poulton E. Tracking skill and manual control 1974, Academic Press, New York.
19. Rhodes G., Brennan S., Carey S. Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19(4):473-497.
20. Rhodes G., Jaquet E., Jeffery L., Evangelista E., Keane J., Calder A.J. Sex-specific norms code face identity. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(1). 1, 1-11.
21. Rhodes G., Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 2006, 46(18):2977-2987.
22. Robbins R., McKone E., Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(3):570-592.
23. Seriès P., Stocker A., Simoncelli E.P. Is the homunculus aware of sensory adaptation?. Neural Computation 2009, 21(12):3271-3304.
24. Susilo T., McKone E., Edwards M. What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research 2010, 50(3):300-314.
25. Thompson P., Burr D. Visual aftereffects. Current Biology 2009, 19(1):R11-R14.
26. Tiddeman B., Burt M., Perrett D. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 2001, 21(5):42-50. 10.1109/38.946630.
27. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1991, 43(2):161-204.
28. Valentine T., Endo M. Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1992, 44(4):671-703.
29. Watt R., Andrews D. Ape: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions. Current Psychological Reviews 1981, 1(2):205-213.
30. Webster M.A., MacLin O. Figural after-effects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6(4):647-653.
31. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428(6982):557-561.
32. Webster M.A., MacLeod D.I.A. Visual adaptation and face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 2011, 366(1571):1702-1725.
33. Xu H., Dayan P., Lipkin R.M., Qian N. Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(13):3374-3383.
34. Zhao L., Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 2001, 41(23):2979-2994.