Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex

Nature

Volumn 439, Issue 7079, 2006, Pages 936-942

  Sharpee, Tatyana O ^a   Sugihara, Hiroki ^a   Kurgansky, Andrei V ^a   Rebrik, Sergei P ^a   Stryker, Michael P ^a   Miller, Kenneth D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Physiology University of California San Francisco ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FREQUENCIES; INFORMATION THEORY; NEUROLOGY;

ADAPTATION AFFECTS; NEURAL RESPONSE; SPATIAL FREQUENCIES;

ADAPTIVE FILTERING;

VISUALIZATION;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CAT; CONTRAST; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; LUMINANCE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33644556164     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature04519     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Theunissen, F. E., Sen, K. & Doupe, A. J. Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. J. Neurosci. 20, 2315-2331 (2000).
2. Sceniak, M. P., Hawken, M. J. & Shapley, R. Contrast-dependent changes in spatial frequency tuning of macaque V1 neurons: effects of a changing receptive field size. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 1363-1373 (2002).
3. Nolt, M. J., Kumbhani, R. D. & Palmer, L. A. Contrast-dependent spatial summation in the lateral geniculate nucleus and retina of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1708-1717 (2004).
4. Maffei, L., Fiorentini, A. & Bisti, S. Neural correlate of perceptual adaptation to gratings. Science 182, 1036-1038 (1973).
5. Shapley, R. & Victor, J. D. The contrast gain control of the cat retina. Vision Res. 19, 431-434 (1979).
6. Shapley, R. M. & Enroth-Cugell, C. in Progress in Retinal Research (eds Osborne, N. N. & Chader, G. J.) 263-346 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1984).
7. Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G. & Freeman, R. D. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 651-667 (1985).
8. Saul, A. B. & Cynader, M. S. Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain. Vis. Neurosci. 2, 593-607 (1989).
9. Smirnakis, S. M., Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., Bialek, W. & Meister, M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 386, 69-73 (1997).
10. Brenner, N., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26, 695-702 (2000).
11. Dragoi, V., Sharma, J. & Sur, M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28, 287-298 (2000).
12. Fairhall, A. L., Lewen, G. D., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter Van Steveninck, R. R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412, 787-792 (2001).
13. Chander, D. & Chichilnisky, E. J. Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina. J. Neurosci. 21, 9904-9916 (2001).
14. Baccus, S. A. & Meister, M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 36, 909-919 (2002).
15. Kohn, A. & Movshon, J. A. Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nature Neurosci. 7, 764-772 (2004).
16. Solomon, S. G., Peirce, J. W., Dhruv, N. T. & Lennie, P. Profound contrast adaptation early in the visual pathway. Neuron 42, 155-162 (2004).
17. Victor, J. D. The dynamics of the cat retinal x-cell centre. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 386, 219-246 (1987).
18. Brown, S. P. & Masland, R. H. Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells. Nature Neurosci. 4, 44-51 (2001).
19. Movshon, J. A. & Lennie, P. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 278, 850-852 (1979).
20. Albrecht, D. G., Farrar, S. B. & Hamilton, D. B. Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 347, 713-739 (1984).
21. David, S. V., Vinje, W. E. & Gallant, J. L. Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of V1 neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 6991-7006 (2004).
22. Baddeley, R. et al. Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1775-1783 (1997).
23. Theunissen, F. E. et al. Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network 12, 289-316 (2001).
24. Ringach, D. L., Hawken, M. J. & Shapley, R. Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences. J. Vis. 2, 12-24 (2002).
25. Smyth, D., Willmore, B., Baker, G. E., Thompson, I. D. & Tolhurst, D. J. The receptive-field organization of simple cells in primary visual cortex of ferrets under natural scene stimulation. J. Neurosci. 23, 4746-4759 (2003).
26. Felsen, G., Touryan, J., Han, F. & Dan, Y. Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes. PLoS Biol. 3, e342 (2005).
27. de Boer, R. & Kuyper, P. Triggered correlation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 15, 169-179 (1968).
28. Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bialek, W. B. Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997).
29. Rust, N. C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J. A. & Simoncelli, E. P. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields. Neuron 46, 945-956 (2005).
30. Sharpee, T., Rust, N. C. & Bialek, W. Analyzing neural responses to natural signals: maximally informative dimensions. Neural Comput. 16, 223-250 (2004).
31. Ruderman, D. L. & Bialek, W. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Lett 73, 814-817 (1994).
32. Field, D. J. What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Comput. 6, 559-601 (1994).
33. Simoncelli, E. P. & Olshausen, B. A. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193-1216 (2001).
34. Skottun, B. C. et al. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res. 31, 1079-1086 (1991).
35. Field, D. J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379-2394 (1987).
36. Dong, D. W. & Atick, J. J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network 6, 345-358 (1995).
37. Brenner, N., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R. Synergy in a neural code. Neural Comput 12, 1531-1552 (2000).
38. Blakemore, C. & Campbell, F. W. Adaptation to spatial stimuli. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 200, 11P-13P (1969).
39. Kvale, M. N. & Schreiner, C. E. Short-term adaptation of auditory receptive fields to dynamic stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 604-612 (2004).
40. Wainwright, M. J. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res. 39, 3960-3974 (1999).
41. Atick, J. J. & Redlich, A. N. What does the retina know about natural scenes? Neural Comput. 4, 196-210 (1992).
42. Hosoya, T., Baccus, S. A. & Meister, M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 436, 71-77 (2005).
43. Dan, Y., Atick, J. J. & Reid, R. C. Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: experimental test of a computational theory. J. Neurosci. 16, 3351-3362 (1996).
44. Emondi, A. A., Rebrik, S. P., Kurgansky, A. V. & Miller, K. D. Tracking neurons recorded from tetrodes across time. J. Neurosci. Methods 135, 95-105 (2004).