Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 37, 2010, Pages 16396-16400

  Dils, Alexia Toskos ^a   Boroditsky, Lera ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodiment; Imagery; Individual differences; Language comprehension; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; IMAGINATION; LANGUAGE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STORYTELLING; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISION;

HUMANS; MOTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77958006631     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009438107     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bergen BK, Lindsay S, Matlock T, Narayanan S (2007) Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cogn Sci 31:733-764.
2. Meteyard L, Bahrami B, Vigliocco G (2007) Motion detection and motion verbs: Language affects low-level visual perception. Psychol Sci 18:1007-1013.
3. Richardson DC, Spivey MJ, Barsalou LW, McRae K (2003) Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cogn Sci 27:767-780.
4. Rinck M, Bower GH (2000) Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Mem Cognit 28:1310-1320. (Pubitemid 32156350)
5. Rinck M, Hähnel A, Bower GH, Glowalla U (1997) The metrics of spatial situation models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:622-637.
6. Spivey MJ, Geng JJ (2001) Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychol Res 65:235-241.
7. Stanfield RA, Zwaan RA (2001) The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychol Sci 12:153-156.
8. Zwaan RA, Madden CJ, Yaxley RH, Aveyard ME (2004) Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cogn Sci 28:611-619.
9. Zwaan RA, Stanfield RA, Yaxley RH (2002) Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci 13:168-171.
10. Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577-609.
11. Saygin AP, McCullough S, Alac M, Emmorey K (2010) Modulation of BOLD response in motion sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. J Cognit Neurosci 22:2480-2490.
12. Grill-Spector K, Sayres R (2008) Object recognition: Insights from advances in fMRI methods. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17:77-79.
13. Logothetis NK (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453:869-878.
14. Blake R, Hiris E (1993) Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Res 33:1589-1592. (Pubitemid 23197375)
15. Hiris E, Blake R (1992) Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9025-9028.
16. Winawer J, Huk AC, Boroditsky L (2008) A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychol Sci 19:276-283.
17. Winawer J, Huk AC, Boroditsky L (2010) A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion. Cognition 114:276-284.
18. Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W (1998) The constructive nature of vision: Direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. Eur J Neurosci 10:1563-1573. (Pubitemid 28327304)
19. Grossman ED, Blake R (2001) Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Res 41:1475-1482.
20. Sadaghiani S, Maier JX, Noppeney U (2009) Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing. J Neurosci 29:6490-6499.
21. Hershenson M (1989) Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration. Percept Psychophys 45:251-257.
22. Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem Cognit 33:710-726.
23. Boulenger V, Hauk O, Pulvermüller F (2009) Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cereb Cortex 19:1905-1914.
24. Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 9:558-565.