Computer attitudes and use among novice teachers: The moderating effects of school environment

Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 93-112

  Teck, Wong Kung ^a   Choo, Goh Swee ^a   Hanafi, Hafizul Fahri ^a   Osman, Rosma ^a  

^a SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Instructional; School environment; Teacher's attitudes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869768964     PISSN: 16758110     EISSN: 21802483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
5. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human accuracy. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 4, 358-373.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A. (1988). Organizational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13, 275-302.
9. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
11. Bandura, A. (2001). The changing face of psychology at the dawning of a globalization era. Canadian Psychology, 42, 12-24.
12. Brooks, G.P. (2004). Sample size determination. Retrieved on 29 April 2007. from http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~brookssb/edre/edre720_samplesize.pdf.
13. Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 26(2), 133-154.
14. Chan, L. H. (2007), Perceived importance and manageability of teachers toward the factors of integrating computer technology into classrooms. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 44-55
15. Cuban, L., Kirkparick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technology in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
16. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Cuban, L. (1996). Techno-reformers and classroom teachers. Education Week, 16(6), 31-46.
18. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms: 1890-1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Curriculum Development Center. (2003). Malaysia's Smart School Project. Retrieved 14 January, 2004, from http://202.190.218.3/smartschool/.
21. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13 (3), 983-1003.
22. Enochs, L.G. (1985). General attitudes of middles school students towards computers. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 5, 56-57.
23. Enochs, L.G., & Riggs, I.M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A pre service elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 694-706.
24. Enochs, L.G., Riggs, I. M., & Ellis, J. D. (1993). The development of partial validation of microcomputer utilization in teaching efficacy beliefs instrument in a science setting. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 257-263.
25. Enochs, L., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 10, 94-202.
26. Eyadat, W. (2006). Assessing students' and professors' attitudes toward the use of computer-based technology in the classroom: A case study at the University of Jordan. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
27. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
29. Gibson, C. (2001). Me and us: differential relationships among goal setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 22, 789-808.
30. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M.H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 503-511.
31. Goldstein, I.L., & Ford, K.J. (2002). Training in Organizations; Needs assessment, development and evaluation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
32. Green, J. D. (2005). The impact of teacher self efficacy and attitudes toward classrooms computers on the use of classroom technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
33. Gressard, C.P., & Loyd, B. H. (1986). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. Association for Education Data Systems Journal, 19, 295-301.
34. Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. International Society for Technology in Education (2004). Education & industry leaders urge congress to restore education technology funding. Retrieved on 22 March 2004, from http://www.iste.org/news/2004/09/ 09edtechfunds/.
36. Jarrett, O.S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(1), 49-59.
37. Jintavee M. (2005). Technology preparation in teacher education programs at public universities in Bangkok (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Graduate School, Texas A & M University-Commerce.
38. Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30(3) 607-610.
39. Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2) 220-237.
40. Ministry of Education. (1997). Smart school flagship application: The Malaysian smart school-A conceptual blueprint. Putrajaya: Government of Malaysia.
41. Ministry of Finance. (2004). The budget speech 2005: Building on past achievements towards greater success. Putrajaya: The Government of Malaysia.
42. Mitchell, A. C. (2003). Computer use among high school educators: Relating teachers' ability, beliefs, and classroom use (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Education, Fordham University.
43. Morrison, J.L. & Osborn, H. (2005). Implementing organic education: An interview with Hugh Osborne. Innovate. Retrieved 12 January 2006. http://www. innovateonline.info/ index.php?view+article&id=236.
44. Pajares, F. (2004). Albert Bandura: Biographical sketch. Retrieved 12 September 2005 from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/bandurabio.html.
45. Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-35.
46. Riggs, I.M., & Enochs, L.G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 76, 625-637.
47. Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in pre-service teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402-4425.
48. TakingITGlobal. (2003). TakingITGlobal projects/ Smart schools. Retrieved 17 January 2004, from http://projects.takingitglobal. org/projectview.html? Project ID=580.
49. The 2007 Budget Speech. (2006). Retrieved on 8 March 2007, from http://www.bnm.gov.my/files/budget2007.en.pdf.
50. Thelma, M.H. (2004). Stages of concern and factors that influence middle school teacher's computer technology use (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School, Baylor University.
51. Torkzadeh, R., Pflughoeft, K., & Hall, L. (1999). Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(4), 299-309.
52. Tracey, J.B., Hinkin, T. R., Tannenbaum, S.I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2001). The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(1), 5-22.
53. Wahab, S.A. (2003). Factors correlating with teachers' use of computer in the classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) School of Education, DePaul University.
54. Wilkie, W.L., & Pessemier, E. A. (1973). Issues in marketing's use of multi-attribute models. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 428-41.