Are meat substitutes liked better over time? A repeated in-home use test with meat substitutes or meat in meals

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 253-263

  Hoek, Annet C ^a,b   Elzerman, Johanna E ^a   Hageman, Rianne ^a   Kok, Frans J ^a   Luning, Pieternel A ^a   Graaf, Cees de ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Boredom; Consumer acceptance; Meat replacers; Meat substitutes; Sustainability; Vegetarian

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 84869191668     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aiking H., De Boer J., Vereijken J. Sustainable Protein Production and Consumption: Pigs or Peas? 2006, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2. Aurelia (2002). Vleesvervangers in Nederland 2002. [A marketing report on meat substitutes in the Netherlands 2002]. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Aurelia.
3. Berlyne D.E. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity 1960, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Berlyne D.E. Novelty, complexity and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics 1970, 716(8):279-286.
5. Bingham A., Hurling R., Stocks J. Acquisition of liking for spinach products. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:461-469.
6. Birch L.L., Marlin D.W. I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences. Appetite 1982, 3(4):353-360.
7. Birch L.L., McPhee L., Shoba B.C., Pirok E., Steinberg L. What kind of exposure reduces children's food neophobia?. Appetite 1987, 9:171-178.
8. Boutrolle I., Delarue J. Studying meals in the home and in the laboratory. Meals in science and practice. interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, 128-165. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Inc, Oxford. H.L. Meiselman (Ed.).
9. Chung S.J., Vickers Z. Long-term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:963-974.
10. Chung S.J., Vickers Z. Influence of sweetness on the sensory-specific satiety and long-term acceptability of tea. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:256-264.
11. Davies J., Lightowler H. Plant-based alternatives to meat. Nutrition & Food Science 1998, 2:90-94.
12. De Bakker, E., & Dagevos, H. (2010). Vleesminnaars, vleesminderaars en vleesmijders: duurzame eiwitconsumptie in een carnivore eetcultuur. [Meat lovers, meat reducers, and meat avoiders; Sustainable protein consumption in a carnivorous food culture]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: LEI Wageningen UR.
13. De Boer J., Helms M., Aiking H. Protein consumption and sustainability: diet diversity in EU-15. Ecological Economics 2006, 59:267-274.
14. Eindhoven J., Peryam D.R. Measurement of preferences for food combinations. Food Technology 1959, 13:379-382.
15. Elzerman H. Substitution of meat by NPFs: Sensory properties and contextual factors. Sustainable Protein Production and Consumption: Pigs or Peas? 2006, 116-122. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. H. Aiking, J. de Boer, J. Vereijken (Eds.).
16. Elzerman J.E., Hoek A.C., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Luning P.A. Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:233-240.
17. Finlayson G., Dalton M. Current progress in the assessment of 'liking' vs 'wanting' food in human appetite. Comment on. '''You Say it's Liking, I Say it's Wanting''. On the difficulty of disentangling food reward in man'. Appetite 2012, 58:373-378.
18. Finlayson G., King N.A., Blundell J.E. Liking vs. wanting food: importance for human appetite control and weight regulation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2007, 31:987-1002.
19. Fischer C. The complexities of modern food consumption and implications for international food product marketers. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 2007, 19(1):7-35.
20. Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunsø K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review. Meat Science 2004, 66(2):259-272.
21. Havermans R.C. ''You Say it's Liking, I Say it's Wanting...'' On the difficulty of disentangling food reward in man. Appetite 2011, 57:286-294.
22. Henriques A.S., King S.C., Meiselman H.L. Consumer segmentation based on food neophobia and its application to product development. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:83-91.
23. Hetherington M.M., Bell A., Rolls B.J. Effects of repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake. British Food Journal 2000, 102(7):507-521.
24. Hetherington M.M., Pirie L.M., Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: Effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 2002, 38:19-28.
25. Hill A.B., Perkins R.E. Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology 1985, 76:235-240.
26. Hoek A.C., Luning P.A., Stafleu A., De Graaf C. Food-related lifestyle and health of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers. Appetite 2004, 42:265-272.
27. Hoek A.C., Luning P.A., Weijzen P., Engels W., Kok F.J., De Graaf C. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes: A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite 2011, 56:662-673.
28. Issanchou S. Consumer expectations and perceptions of meat and meat product quality. Meat Science 1996, 43(1):S5-S19.
29. Jaeger S.R., Harker F.R. Consumer evaluation of novel kiwifruit: Willingness-to-pay. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2005, 85:2519-2526.
30. Janda S., Trocchia P.J. Vegetarianism: Toward a greater understanding. Psychology & Marketing 2001, 18(12):1205-1240.
31. Jongen W.M.F., Meerdink G. Pea proteins based food products as meat replacers: The Profetas concept. Nahrung/Food 2001, 45(6):402-404.
32. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Hottenstein H.W., Work T.M., Cronk V. The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:58-65.
33. King S.C., Weber A.J., Meiselman H.L., Lv N. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:645-653.
34. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice. Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:359-373.
35. Köster E.P., Mojet J. Boredom and the reasons why some new food products fail. Consumer-led food product development 2007, 262-280. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England. H. MacFie (Ed.).
36. Lea E., Worsley A. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite 2001, 36(2):127-136.
37. Lévy C.M., MacRae A., Köster E.P. Perceived stimulus complexity and food preference development. Acta Psychologica 2006, 123(3):394-413.
38. Lévy C.M., Köster E.P. The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:185-200.
39. Marshall D., Bell R. Meal construction: exploring the relationship between eating occasion and location. Food quality and Preference 2003, 14:53-64.
40. McIlveen H., Abraham C., Armstrong G. Meat avoidance and the role of replacers. Nutrition & Food Science 1999, 1:29-36.
41. McMichael A.J., Powles J.W., Butler C.D., Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet 2007, 370(9594):1253-1263.
42. Meiselman H.L. Methodology and theory in human eating research. Appetite 1992, 19(1):49-55.
43. Meiselman H.L. Dimensions of the meal 2000, Aspen Publishers, Inc., Maryland.
44. Meiselman H.L. Meals in science and practice. interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Inc., Oxford.
45. Meiselman H.L., De Graaf C., Lesher L.L. The effects of variety and monotony on food acceptance and intake at a midday meal. Physiology & Behavior 2000, 70(1-2):119-125.
46. Mela D.J. Why do we like what we like?. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2000, 81:10-16.
47. Michaut, A.M.K. (2004). Consumer response to innovative products with application to foods, PhD thesis. The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
48. Moskowitz H.R. Engineering out food boredom: a product development approach that combines home use tests and time-preference analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:445-456.
49. NEVO (2006). NEVO-TABEL 2006: Nederlands Voedingsstoffenbestand. [Dutch Food Composition Table 2006]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Stichting NEVO.
50. O'Hanlon J.F. Boredom: practical consequences of a theory. Acta Psychologica 1981, 49:53-82.
51. Olabi A., Najm N.E.O., Baghdadi O.K., Morton J.M. Food neophobia levels of Lebanese and American college students. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:353-362.
52. Oxford dictionary (2012). Oxford dictionaries online: Oxford University Press. (Accessed March 2012). http://oxforddictionaries.com.
53. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 1982, 3:283-290.
54. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a Scale to Measure the Trait of Food Neophobia in Humans. Appetite 1992, 19:105-120.
55. Pliner P., Pelchat M., Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite 1993, 20:111-123.
56. Porcherot C., Issanchou S. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:21-29.
57. Raudenbush B., Frank R.A. Assessing Food Neophobia: The Role of Stimulus Familiarity. Appetite 1999, 32:261-271.
58. Rodger G. Production and properties of mycoprotein as a meat alternative. Food Technology 2001, 55:36-41.
59. Rozin P., Tuorila H.M. Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 1993, 4:11-20.
60. Sadler M.J. Meat alternatives - market developments and health benefits. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2004, 15:250-260.
61. Santos M.L.S., Booth D. Influences on meat avoidance among British students. Appetite 1996, 27:197-205.
62. Schösler H., De Boer J., Boersema J.J. Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite 2012, 58:39-47.
63. Schutz H.G., Pilgrim F.J. A field study of food monotony. Psychological Reports 1958, 4:559-565.
64. Siegel P.S., Pilgrim F.J. The effect of monotony on the acceptance of food. American Journal of Psychology 1958, 71:756-759.
65. Son J.-S., Hong J.H., Kim K.-O. Effects of interval length between tasting sessions and sweetener level on long-term acceptability of novel green tea drinks. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:956-966.
66. Stang D.J. Effects of mere exposure on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975, 31:7-12.
67. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:367-376.
68. Sulmont-Rossé C., Chabanet C., Issanchou S., Köster E.P. Impact of the arousal potential of uncommon drinks on the repeated exposure effect. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:412-420.
69. Tuorila H.M., Lähteenmäki L., Pohjalainen L., Lotti L. Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:29-37.
70. Tuorila H.M., Meiselman H.L., Bell R., Cardello A.V., Johnson W. Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 1994, 23:231-246.
71. Tuorila H.M., Meiselman H.L., Cardello A.V., Lesher L.L. Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:421-430.
72. Van Trijp, J.C.M. (1995). Variety-seeking in product choice behavior: theory with applications in the food domain, PhD Thesis. The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University.
73. Van Trijp H.C.M., Hoyer W.D., Inman J.J. Why switch? Product category-level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 1996, 33(3):281-292.
74. Van Trijp H.C.M., Van Kleef E. Newness, value and new product performance. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2008, 19:562-573.
75. Vickers Z., Holton E. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption and postconsumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea. Journal of Sensory Studies 1998, 13:199-212.
76. Vinnari M., Tapio P. Future images of meat consumption in 2030. Futures 2009, 41(5):269-278.
77. Vodanovich S.J. Psychometric measures of boredom: a review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology 2003, 137(6):569-595.
78. Weijzen P.L.G., Zandstra E.H., Alfieri C., De Graaf C. Effects of complexity and intensity on sensory specific satiety and food acceptance after repeated consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:349-359.
79. TM Myco-protein - Overview of a successful fungal product. Mycologist 2004, 18(1):17-20.
80. Zajonc, R.B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monograph supplement No. 2, Part 2.
81. Zandstra E.H., De Graaf C., Mela D.J., Van Staveren W.A. Short- and longterm effects of changes in pleasantness on food intake. Appetite 2000, 34:253-260.
82. Zandstra E.H., De Graaf C., Van Trijp H.C.M. Effects of variety and repeated in-home consumption on product acceptance. Appetite 2000, 35:113-119.
83. Zandstra E.H., Weegels M.F., Van Spronsen A.A., Klerk M. Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:549-557.