Effects of interval length between tasting sessions and sweetener level on long-term acceptability of novel green tea drinks

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 956-966

  Son, Jung Soo ^a   Hong, Jae Hee ^a   Kim, Kwang Ok ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Exposure; Green tea; Interval length; Long term acceptability test; Novel flavor; Sweetener level

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049444139     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arvola A., Lahteenmaki L., Tuorila H. Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheese: The effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite 1999, 32:113-126.
2. Berlyne D.E. Novelty, complexity and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics 1970, 8:279-286.
3. Birch L.L., Marlin D.W. I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences. Appetite 1982, 3:353-360.
4. Bornstein R.F., Kale A.R., Cornell K.R. Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:791-800.
5. Chung S.J., Vickers Z. Influence of sweetness on the sensory-specific satiety and long-term acceptability of tea. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:256-264.
6. Crandall C.S. The liking of foods as a result of exposure: Eating doughnuts in Alaska. Journal of Social Psychology 1985, 123:187-194.
7. DeCarlo L.T. Intertrial interval and sequential dependencies in magnitude scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1080-1088.
8. De Houwer J., Thomas S., Baeyens F. Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127(6):853-869.
9. Frederick S., Loewenstein G. Henonic adaptation. Scientific perspectives on enjoyment, suffering, and well-being 1999, Russel Sage, New York. D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.).
10. Guinard J.-X., Little C., Marty C., Palchak T.R. Effect of sugar and acid on the acceptability of frozen yogurt to a student population. Journal of Dairy Science 2004, 77:1232-1238.
11. Harrison A.A. Response competition, frequency, exploratory behavior, and liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 9:363-368.
12. Henriques A.S., King S.C., Meiselman H.L. Consumer segmentation based on food neophobia and its application to product development. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:83-91.
13. Hetherington M.M., Bell A., Rolls B.J. Effects of repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake. British Food Journal 2000, 102:507-521.
14. Hetherington M.M., Pirie L.M., Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: Effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 2002, 38:19-28.
15. Hottenstein A.W., Taylor R., Carr B.T. Preference segments: A deeper understanding of consumer acceptance or a serving order effect?. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:711-718.
16. King S.C., Meiselman H.L., Henriques A. The effect of choice and psychographics on the acceptability of novel flavors. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:692-696.
17. Köster E.P. Time and frequency analysis: A new approach to the measurement of some less-well-known aspects of food preferences. Criteria of food acceptance 1981, Forster Verlag, Zurich. J. Solms, R.L. Hall (Eds.).
18. Kramer F.M., Leser L.L., Meiselman H.L. Monotony and choice. Repeated serving of the same item to soldiers under field conditions. Appetite 2001, 36:239-240.
19. Lee H.S., O'Mahony M. Difference test sensitivity: Cognitive contrast effects. Journal of Sensory Studies 2007, 22:17-33.
20. Levy C.M., Köster E.P. The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:185-200.
21. MacFie H.J.H., Bratchell N. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall test. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 4:129-148.
22. Muir D.D., Huner E.A. Sensory evaluation of cheddar cheese: Order of testing and carryover effects. Food Quality and Preference 1991, 3:141-145.
23. O'Mahony M., Goldstein L. Effectiveness of sensory difference tests: Sequential sensitivity analysis for liquid food stimuli. Journal of Food Science 1986, 51:1550-1553.
24. O'Mahony M., Odbert N. A comparison of sensory difference testing procedures: Sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. Journal of Food Science 1985, 50:1055-1058.
25. Peryam D.R., Pilgrim F.J. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology 1957, 11:9-14.
26. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 1982, 3:283-290.
27. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 1992, 19:105-120.
28. Pliner P., Pelchat M., Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite 1993, 20:111-123.
29. Porcherot C., Issanchou S. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:21-29.
30. Precscott J., Kim H., Kim K.O. Cognitive mediation of hedonic changes to odors following exposure. Chemosensory Perception 2008, 1:2-8.
31. Richard-son N.J., Roger P.J., Elliman N.A. Conditioned flavor preferences reinforced by caffeine consumed after lunch. Physiology and Behavior 1996, 60:257-263.
32. Schutz H.G., Pilgrim F.J. A field study of food monotony. Psychological Reports 1958, 4:559-565.
33. Siegel P.S., Pelgrim F.J. The effect of monotony on the acceptance of food. American Journal of Psychology 1958, 71:756-759.
34. Shin J.Y., Delgerzaya P., Lim Y.B., Park J.B., Kim K.O. Sensory and chemical characteristics of worts fermented by Leuconostoc citreum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and consumer acceptability with added flavorings. Food Science and Biotechnology 2009, 18:1109-1117.
35. Stang D.J. When familiarity bread contempt, absence make the heart grow fonder: Effect of exposure and delay on taste pleasantness rating. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society 1975, 6:273-275.
36. Steiner J.E., Glaser D., Hawilo M.E., Berridge K.C. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:53-74.
37. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:367-376.
38. Tuorila-Ollikainen H., Lahteenmaki L., Salovaara H. Attitudes, norms, intentions and hedonic responses in the selection of low salt bread in a longitudinal choice experiment. Appetite 1986, 7:127-139.
39. Vickers Z., Holton E. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption, and postconsumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea. Journal of Sensory Studies 1998, 13:199-212.
40. Wakeling L.N., MacFie H.J.H. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only of subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:299-308.
41. Yeomans M.R., Spetch H., Roger P.J. Conditioned flavor preference negatively reinforced by caffeine in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 1998, 137:401-409.
42. Yeomans M.R., Jackson A., Lee M.D., Nesic J.S., Durlach P.J. Expression of flavor preference conditioned by caffeine is dependent on caffeine deprivation state. Psychopharmacology 2000, 150:208-215.
43. Yeomans M.R., Ripley T., Lee M.D., Durlach P.J. No evidence for latent learning of liking for flavours conditioned by caffeine. Psychopharmacology 2001, 157:172-179.
44. Yeomans M.R., Mobini S., Elliman T.D., Walker H.C., Stevenson R.J. Hedonic and sensory characteristics of odors conditioned by pairing with tastants in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2006, 32:215-228.
45. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 9:1-32.
46. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C., van Trijp H.C.M. Effects of variety and repeated in-home consumption on product acceptance. Appetite 2000, 35:113-119.
47. Zandstra E.H., Weegels M.F., Van Spronsen A.A., Klerk M. Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:549-557.
48. Zellner D.A., Rozin P., Aron M., Kulish C. Conditioned enhancement of human's liking for flavor by pairing with sweetness. Learning and Motivation 1983, 14:338-350.