Impact of the arousal potential of uncommon drinks on the repeated exposure effect

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 412-420

  Sulmont Rossé, Claire ^a   Chabanet, Claire ^a   Issanchou, Sylvie ^a   Koster E P ^b  

^a CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arousal potential; Complexity; Liking; Longitudinal data; Novelty; Repeated exposure

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749150378     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AFNOR (1987). Directives générales pour l'implantation de locaux destinés à l'analyse sensorielle, NF-V05-105. Paris: AFNOR.
2. Berlyne D.E. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity (1960), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
3. Berlyne D.E. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8 (1970) 279-286
4. Birch L.L., and Marlin D.W. I don't like it; I never tried it: Effect of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences. Appetite 3 (1982) 353-360
5. Bornstein R.F., and d'Agostino P.R. The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition 12 (1994) 103-128
6. Bornstein R.F., Kale A.R., and Cornell K.R. Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 791-800
7. Chung S.-J., and Vickers S. Long-term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness. Food Quality and Behavior 18 (2007) 963-974
8. Collett D. Modeling binary data (1996), T.J. Press, Londres
9. Dember W.N., and Earl R.W. Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors. Psychological Review 64 (1957) 91-96
10. Diggle P.J., Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. Analysis of longitudinal data (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Harrison A.A. Response competition, frequency, exploratory behavior, and liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (1968) 363-368
12. Hetherington M.M., Pirie L.M., and Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: Effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 38 (2002) 19-28
13. Issanchou S., Köster E.P., and Teerling A. Caractéristiques de l'arôme et préférence. Sciences des Aliments 7 (1987) 53-58
14. Jacoby L.L., and Kelley C.M. Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13 (1987) 314-336
15. Köster E.P., and Mojet J. Boredom and the reasons why some new products fail. In: MacFie H.J.H. (Ed). Consumer-led food product development (2007), Wooodhead Publishing, Abbington, Cambridge
16. Kramer F.M., Lesher L.L., and Meiselman H.L. Monotony and choice: Repeated serving of the same item to soldiers under field conditions. Appetite 36 (2001) 239-240
17. Lévy, C. M. (1998). Elaboration de méthodologies adaptées à l'étude de la dynamique des préférences. Doctoral Thesis. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne.
18. Lévy, C., MacRae, A., & Köster, E. P. (2002). The role of "collative properties" in the development of preference during exposure to an orange drink. In Xth food choice conference. Wageningen, June 30-July 3.
19. Moskowitz H.R. Engineering out food boredom: A product development approach that combines home use tests and time-preference analysis. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000) 445-456
20. Pinheiro J.C., and Bates D.M. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York
21. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 3 (1982) 283-290
22. Pliner P., and Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite 19 (1992) 105-120
23. Pliner P., Pelchat M.L., and Grabski M. Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite 20 (1993) 111-123
24. Porcherot, C. (1995). Contribution à la mesure de la familiarité et de la complexité d'arômes alimentaires. Pertinence de ces concepts pour expliquer les préférences des consommateurs. Doctoral Thesis. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne.
25. R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
26. ® (1989). User's guide. Cary: SAS Institute.
27. Stang D.J. When familiarity breeds contempt, absence makes the heart grow fonder: Effects of exposure and delay on taste pleasantness ratings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (1975) 273-275
28. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., and Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999) 367-376
29. Sulmont, C. (2000). Impact de la mémoire des odeurs sur la réponse hédonique au cours d'une exposition répétée. Doctoral Thesis. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne.
30. Vickers Z., and Holton E. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption, and postconsumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea. Journal of Sensory Studies 13 (1998) 199-212
31. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (1968) 1-27
32. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C., and van Trijp H.C. Effects of variety and repeated in-home consumption on product acceptance. Appetite 35 (2000) 113-119
33. Zandstra E.H., Weegels M.F., Van Spronsen A.A., and Klerk M. Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 549-557