Text Coherence and Readability

Topics in Language Disorders

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 204-224

  Meyer, Bonnie J F ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coherence; Readability; Reading comprehension; Signaling; Structure strategy; Text recall; Text structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042919525     PISSN: 02718294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00011363-200307000-00007     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Anderson, R. C., & Davison, A. (1988). Conceptual and empirical bases of readability formulas. In A. Davision & G. Green (Eds.), Critical approaches to readability (pp. 23-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Armbruster, B., Anderson, T., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
3. Bartlett, B. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
4. Borgatta, E. F., & Corsini, R. J. (1964). Manual for the Quick Word Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
5. Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., & Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51-61.
6. Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727-752.
7. Chall, J. S., Bissex, G. L., Conrad, S. S., & Harris-Sharples, S. (1996). Qualitative assessment of text difficulty. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
8. Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
9. Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456.
10. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20, 37-54.
11. Dee-Lucas, D., & DiVesta, F. (1980). Learner-generated organizational aids: Effects on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 304-311.
12. Educational Records Bureau. (2001). Comprehensive testing program. New York: Author.
13. Educational Testing Service. (1977). Test of basic skills. Princeton, NJ: Author.
14. Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65-74.
15. Fry, E. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575, 578.
16. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 289-312). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Goldman, M. (1997, October). Basic training. Boys' Life Magazine. Irving, TX: Boy Scouts of America.
18. Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Volume III (pp. 311-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Goldman, S. R., Varma, S., & Cote, N. (1996). Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: Toward "smarter" and flexible models of text comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Grasesser (Eds.), Models of text comprehension (pp. 73-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Gordon, C. J. (1990). Contexts for expository text structure use. Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 55-72.
21. Grimes, J. E. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
22. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
23. Hartley, J., & Harris, J. L. (2001). Reading the typography of text. In J. L. Harris, A.G. Kamhi, & K.E. Pollock (Eds), Literacy in African American communities (pp. 109-126).
24. Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In Cermak, L., and Craik, F. (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Kintsch, W. (1979). On modeling comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 14, 3-14.
26. Kintsch, W., & Vipond, E. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
28. Klare, G. R. (1974-1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 62-102.
29. Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
30. Klare, G. R. (1988). The formative years. In B. L. Zakaluk & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Readability: Its past, present, and future (pp. 14-34). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402-412.
32. Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1985). Topic structure representation and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 137-148.
33. Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1995). Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 537-544.
34. Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of headings on text recall and summarization. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 261-278.
35. Lorch, R. F. Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects on signaling topic structure in text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 281-290.
36. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
37. Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. Meyer, B. J. F. (1984). Text dimensions and cognitive processing. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and understanding texts (pp 3-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Meyer, B. J. F. (1985a). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britton & J. Black (Eds.), Analyzing and understanding expository text (pp. 11-64, 269-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Meyer, B. J. F. (1985b). Signaling the structure of text. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text (pp. 64-89). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
41. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of the top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
42. Meyer, B. J. F., Marsiske, M., & Willis, S. L. (1993). Text processing variables predict the readability of everyday documents read by older adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 234-249.
43. Meyer, B. J. P., Middlemiss, W., Theodorou, E., Brezinski, K. L., McDougall, J., & Bartlett, B. J. (2002). Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children via the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 486-519.
44. Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (1997). Age differences in efficiency of reading comprehension from printed versus computer-displayed text. Educational Gerontology, 23, 789-807.
45. Meyer, B. J. F, & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141-159.
46. Meyer, B. J. P., & Rice, G. E. (1982). The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text. Text, 2, 155-192.
47. Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, G. E. (1983). Learning and memory from text across the adult life span. In J. Fine & R. O. Freedle (Eds.), Developmental issues in discourse (pp. 291-306). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
48. Meyer, B. J. P., & Rice, G. E. (1989). Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task. In L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubin, & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and later life (pp. 157-194). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Meyer, B.J.F., Talbot, A.P., Poon, L.W., & Johnson, M.M. (2001). Effects of structure strategy instruction on text recall of older African American Adults. In J. L. Harris, A. Kamhi, & K. Pollock (Eds.), Literacy in African Americans communities (pp. 233-263). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A. P., Stubblefield, R. A., & Poon, L. W. (1998). Interest and strategies of young and old readers differentially interact with characteristics of texts. Educational Gerontology, 24, 747-771.
51. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A. P., & Florencio, D. (1999). Reading rate and prose retrieval. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 303-330.
52. Meyer, B. J. F., Young, C. J., & Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Enhanced reading comprehension and memory across the life span through strategic text structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Miller, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335-354.
54. Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128-147.
55. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (1985). The reading report card. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
56. Neufeldt, V., & Guralnick, D.B. (Eds.) (1991). Webster's New World dictionary (Third College ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
57. Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
58. Pearson, D. (1974-1975). The effects of grammatical complexity on children's comprehension, recall, and conception of certain semantic relations. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 155-192.
59. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins.
60. Raphael, T. E., & Kirschner, B. W. (1985). The effects of instruction in comparison/contrast text structure on sixth-grade students' reading comprehension and writing products (Research Series No. 161). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
61. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.
62. Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141-160.
63. Slater, W. H., Graves, M. F., & Piche, G. L. (1985). Effects of structural organizers on ninth-grade students' comprehension and recall of four patterns of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 189-201.
64. Spyridakis, J. H., & Standal, T. C. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 285-298.
65. Taylor, B.M., & Beach, R. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 124-146.
66. Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.