Theoretical constructs and relationships in information systems research

Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-17

  Furneaux, Brent ^a   Wade, Michael ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857960333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-659-4.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Alter, S. (2003). 18 reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace "the IT artifact" as the core subject matter of the IS field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(23), 366-395.
2. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.
3. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
4. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
6. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
7. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
8. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230-251.
9. Ferratt, T. W., Gorman, M. F., Kanet, J. J., & Salisbury, W. D. (2007). IS journal quality assessment using the author affiliation index. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17, 710-724.
10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
11. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642.
12. Klein, K. J., Tosi, H., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (1999). Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 243-248.
13. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
15. Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 507-536.
16. Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530-547.
17. Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249-265.:
18. Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking "IT" in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
19. Popper, K. R. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.
20. Power, D. J. (2003). The maturing IS discipline: Institutionalizing our domain of inquiry. Communications of AIS, 2003(12), 539-545.
21. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
22. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371-384.
23. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
24. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., & Glass, R. L. (2002). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 129-174.
25. Weber, R. (2003). Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), iii-xii.
26. Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385-390.
27. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
28. Wu, Y. A., & Saunders, C. (2003). The IS core - VI: Further along the road to the IT artifact. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(36), 562-567.