Cooperative dynamics of proteins unraveled by network models

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 426-439

  Eyal, Eran ^a,b   Dutta, Anindita ^a   Bahar, Ivet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPIC NETWORKS; ANISOTROPIC RESPONSE; COMPARATIVE MODELING; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; ELASTIC NETWORK MODELS; GAUSSIAN NETWORK MODEL; MOLECULAR REPLACEMENTS; STRUCTURE REFINEMENTS;

ANISOTROPY; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 84869065683     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.44     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Bahar I, Chennubhotla C, Tobi D. Intrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007, 17:633-640.
2. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Bakan A, Shrivastava IH. Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: intrinsic motions of membrane proteins. Chem Rev 2010, 110:1463-1497.
3. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997, 2:173-181.
4. Haliloglu T, Bahar I, Erman B. Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 79:3090-3093.
5. Flory P. Statistical thermodynamics of random networks. Proc R Soc Lond A 1976, 351:351-380.
6. Bruschweiler R. Collective protein dynamics and nuclear spin relaxation. J Chem Phys 1995, 102:3396-3403.
7. Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996, 77:1905-1908.
8. Bakan A, Bahar I. The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14349-14354.
9. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:18908-18913.
10. James LC, Roversi P, Tawfik DS. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 2003, 299:1362-1367.
11. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 2009, 324:203-207.
12. Eyal E, Bahar I. Toward a molecular understanding of the anisotropic response of proteins to external forces: insights from elastic network models. Biophys J 2008, 94:3424-3435.
13. Sacquin-Mora S, Lavery R. Modeling the mechanical response of proteins to anisotropic deformation. Chemphyschem 2009, 10:115-118.
14. Chennubhotla C, Bahar I. Signal propagation in proteins and relation to equilibrium fluctuations. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:1716-1726.
15. Cavasotto CN, Kovacs JA, Abagyan RA. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127:9632-9640.
16. Amadei A, Linssen AB, Berendsen HJ. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993, 17:412-425.
17. Hinsen K, Reuter N, Navaza J, Stokes DL, Lacapere JJ. Normal mode-based fitting of atomic structure into electron density maps: application to sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase. Biophys J 2005, 88:818-827.
18. Suhre K, Navaza J, Sanejouand YH. NORMA: a tool for flexible fitting of high-resolution protein structures into low-resolution electron-microscopy-derived density maps. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006, 62:1098-1100.
19. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks CL III. Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into low-resolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 2004, 337:985-999.
20. Brooks B, Karplus M. Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983, 80:6571-6575.
21. Go N, Noguti T, Nishikawa T. Dynamics of a small globular protein in terms of low-frequency vibrational modes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983, 80:3696-3700.
22. Levitt M, Sander C, Stern PS. Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1985, 181:423-447.
23. Bahar I, Rader AJ. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005, 15:586-592.
24. Cui Q. Bahar IE. Normal Mode Analysis: Theory and Applications to Biological and Chemical Systems. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.
25. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, Feng Z, Gilliland GL, Iype L, Jain S, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002, 58:899-907.
26. Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, Bahar I. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 2001, 80:505-515.
27. Doruker P, Atilgan AR, Bahar I. Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to alpha-amylase inhibitor. Proteins 2000, 40:512-524.
28. Eyal E, Yang LW, Bahar I. Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2619-2627.
29. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Demirel MC, Erman B. Vibrational dynamics of folded proteins: significance of slow and fast motions in relation to function and stability. Phys Rev Lett 1998, 80:2733-2736.
30. Demirel MC, Atilgan AR, Jernigan RL, Erman B, Bahar I. Identification of kinetically hot residues in proteins. Protein Sci 1998, 7:2522-2532.
31. Haliloglu T, Keskin O, Ma B, Nussinov R. How similar are protein folding and protein binding nuclei? Examination of vibrational motions of energy hot spots and conserved residues. Biophys J 2005, 88:1552-1559.
32. Rader AJ, Bahar I. Folding core predictions from network models of proteins. Polymer 2004, 45:659-668.
33. Isin B, Schulten K, Tajkhorshid E, Bahar I. Mechanism of signal propagation upon retinal isomerization: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of rhodopsin restrained by normal modes. Biophys J 2008, 95:789-803.
34. Oberhauser AF, Carrion-Vazquez M. Mechanical biochemistry of proteins one molecule at a time. J Biol Chem 2008, 283:6617-6621.
35. Sulkowska JI, Cieplak M. Stretching to understand proteins - a survey of the protein data bank. Biophys J 2008, 94:6-13.
36. Grater F, Shen J, Jiang H, Gautel M, Grubmuller H. Mechanically induced titin kinase activation studied by force-probe molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 2005, 88:790-804.
37. Lee EH, Gao M, Pinotsis N, Wilmanns M, Schulten K. Mechanical strength of the titin Z1Z2-telethonin complex. Structure 2006, 14:497-509.
38. Lu H, Schulten K. The key event in force-induced unfolding of titin's immunoglobulin domains. Biophys J 2006, 79:51-65.
39. Lu H, Krammer A, Isralewitz B, Vogel V, Schulten K. Computer modeling of force-induced titin domain unfolding. Adv Exp Med Biol 2000, 481:143-160.
40. Pabon G, Amzel LM. Mechanism of titin unfolding by force: insight from quasi-equilibrium molecular dynamics calculations. Biophys J 2006, 91:467-472.
41. Dietz H, Rief M. Elastic bond network model for protein unfolding mechanics. Phys Rev Lett 2008, 100:098101.
42. Sulkowska JI, Kloczkowski A, Sen TZ, Cieplak M, Jernigan RL. Predicting the order in which contacts are broken during single molecule protein stretching experiments. Proteins 2008, 71:45-60.
43. Su JG, Li CH, Hao R, Chen WZ, Wang CX. Protein unfolding behavior studied by elastic network model. Biophys J 2008, 94:4586-4596.
44. Brockwell DJ, Paci E, Zinober RC, Beddard GS, Olmsted PD, Smith DA, Perham RN, Radford SE. Pulling geometry defines the mechanical resistance of a beta-sheet protein. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:731-737.
45. Carrion-Vazquez M, Li H, Lu H, Marszalek PE, Oberhauser AF, Fernandez JM. The mechanical stability of ubiquitin is linkage dependent. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:738-743.
46. Dietz H, Berkemeier F, Bertz M, Rief M. Anisotropic deformation response of single protein molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:12724-12728.
47. West DK, Brockwell DJ, Olmsted PD, Radford SE, Paci E. Mechanical resistance of proteins explained using simple molecular models. Biophys J 2006, 90:287-297.
48. Dutta A, Bahar I. Metal-binding residues are distinguished by their lower mobilities and efficient signal propagation properties. Structure 2010, 18:1140-1148.
49. Landau M, Mayrose I, Rosenberg Y, Glaser F, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:W299-W302.
50. Balabin IA, Yang W, Beratan DN. Coarse-grained modeling of allosteric regulation in protein receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14253-14258.
51. Chennubhotla C, Yang Z, Bahar I. Coupling between global dynamics and signal transduction pathways: a mechanism of allostery for chaperonin GroEL. Mol Biosyst 2008, 4:287-292.
52. Diamond R. On the use of normal modes in thermal parameter refinement: theory and application to the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Acta Crystallogr A 1990, 46:425-435.
53. Kidera A, Go N. Refinement of protein dynamic structure: normal mode refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990, 87:3718-3722.
54. Kidera A, Inaka K, Matsushima M, Go N. Normal mode refinement: crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure. II. Application to human lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1992, 225:477-486.
55. Kidera A, Inaka K, Matsushima M, Go N. Normal mode refinement: crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure applied to human lysozyme. Biopolymers 1992, 32:315-319.
56. Chen X, Poon BK, Dousis A, Wang Q, Ma J. Normal-mode refinement of anisotropic thermal parameters for potassium channel KcsA at 3.2 Å crystallographic resolution. Structure 2007, 15:955-962.
57. Delarue M, Dumas P. On the use of low-frequency normal modes to enforce collective movements in refining macromolecular structural models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:6957-6962.
58. Poon BK, Chen X, Lu M, Vyas NK, Quiocho FA, Wang Q, Ma J. Normal mode refinement of anisotropic thermal parameters for a supramolecular complex at 3.42-Å crystallographic resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:7869-7874.
59. Ni F, Poon BK, Wang Q, Ma J. Application of normal-mode refinement to X-ray crystal structures at the lower resolution limit. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2009, 65:633-643.
60. Chen X, Lu M, Poon BK, Wang Q, Ma J. Structural improvement of unliganded simian immunodeficiency virus gp120 core by normal-mode-based X-ray crystallographic refinement. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2009, 65:339-347.
61. Song G, Jernigan RL. vGNM: a better model for understanding the dynamics of proteins in crystals. J Mol Biol 2007, 369:880-893.
62. Suhre K, Sanejouand YH. On the potential of normal-mode analysis for solving difficult molecular-replacement problems. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004, 60:796-799.
63. Falke S, Tama F, Brooks CL, III, Gogol EP, Fisher MT. The 13 angstroms structure of a chaperonin GroEL-protein substrate complex by cryo-electron microscopy. J Mol Biol 2005, 348:219-230.
64. Mitra K, Schaffitzel C, Shaikh T, Tama F, Jenni S, Brooks CL 3rd, Ban N, Frank J. Structure of the E. coli protein-conducting channel bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 2005, 438:318-324.
65. Ming D, Kong Y, Lambert MA, Huang Z, Ma J. How to describe protein motion without amino acid sequence and atomic coordinates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:8620-8625.
66. Tama F, Wriggers W, Brooks CL III Exploring global distortions of biological macromolecules and assemblies from low-resolution structural information and elastic network theory. J Mol Biol 2002, 321:297-305.
67. Brink J, Ludtke SJ, Kong Y, Wakil SJ, Ma J, Chiu W. Experimental verification of conformational variation of human fatty acid synthase as predicted by normal mode analysis. Structure 2004, 12:185-191.
68. Chacon P, Tama F, Wriggers W. Mega-dalton biomolecular motion captured from electron microscopy reconstructions. J Mol Biol 2003, 326:485-492.
69. Lindahl E, Azuara C, Koehl P, Delarue M. NOMAD-Ref: visualization, deformation and refinement of macromolecular structures based on all-atom normal mode analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:W52-W56.
70. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks CL III Normal mode based flexible fitting of high-resolution structure into low-resolution experimental data from cryo-EM. J Struct Biol 2004, 147:315-326.
71. Leo-Macias A, Lopez-Romero P, Lupyan D, Zerbino D, Ortiz AR. Core deformations in protein families: a physical perspective. Biophys Chem 2005, 115:125-128.
72. Leo-Macias A, Lopez-Romero P, Lupyan D, Zerbino D, Ortiz AR. An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies. Biophys J 2005, 88:1291-1299.
73. Stumpff-Kane AW, Maksimiak K, Lee MS, Feig M. Sampling of near-native protein conformations during protein structure refinement using a coarse-grained model, normal modes, and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2008, 70:1345-1356.
74. Qian B, Ortiz AR, Baker D. Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:15346-15351.
75. Yang LW, Eyal E, Bahar I, Kitao A. Principal component analysis of native ensembles of biomolecular structures (PCA_NEST): insights into functional dynamics. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:606-614.
76. Han R, Leo-Macias A, Zerbino D, Bastolla U, Contreras-Moreira B, Ortiz AR. An efficient conformational sampling method for homology modeling. Proteins 2008, 71:175-188.
77. Marechal JD, Perahia D. Use of normal modes for structural modeling of proteins: the case study of rat heme oxygenase 1. Eur Biophys J 2008, 37:1157-1165.