Sampling of near-native protein conformations during protein structure refinement using a coarse-grained model, normal modes, and molecular dynamics simulations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1345-1356

  Stumpff Kane, Andrew W ^a   Maksimiak, Katarzyna ^a   Lee, Michael S ^b,c   Feig, Michael ^a,d  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNITED STATES ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Homology modeling; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SAMPLING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 39749103470     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21674     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round V. Proteins 2003;53:334-339.
2. Bradley P, Misura KMS, Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 2005;309:1868-1871.
3. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick JR. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Prot Struct Funct Bioinform 2005;61:91-98.
4. Sali A. Modeling the structures of proteins and macromolecular assemblies. Faseb J 2006;20:A851-A851.
5. Ginalski K, Grishin NV, Godzik A, Rychlewski L. Practical lessons from protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:1874-1891.
6. Tramontano A, Morea V. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 2003;53:352-368.
7. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyal IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
8. Montelione GT. Structural genomics: an approach to the protein folding problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:13488-13489.
9. Westbrook J, Feng ZK, Chen L, Yang HW, Berman HM. The protein data bank and structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:489-491.
10. Gerstein M, Edwards A, Arrowsmith CH, Montelione GT. Structural genomics: current progress. Science 2003;299:1663-1663.
11. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
12. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:1029-1034.
13. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:559-566.
14. Xiang ZX. Advances in homology protein structure modeling. Curr Prot Pept Sci 2006;7:217-227.
15. Ginalski K. Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:172-177.
16. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Functional inferences from blind ab initio protein structure predictions. J Struct Biol 2001;134:186-190.
17. Wieman H, Tondel K, Anderssen E, Drablos F. Homology-based modelling of targets for rational drug design. Mini-Rev Med Chem 2004;4:793-804.
18. Topf M, Baker ML, Marti-Renom MA, Chiu W, Sali A. Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and cryoEM density fitting. J Mol Biol 2006;357:1655-1668.
19. Misura KMS, Chivian D, Rohl CA, Kim DE, Baker D. Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:5361-5366.
20. Jonassen I, Klose D, Taylor WR. Protein model refinement using structural fragment tessellation. Comput Biol Chem 2006;30:360-366.
21. Lu H, Skolnick J. Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models. Biopolymers 2003;70:575-584.
22. Reva BA, Finkelstein AV, Skolnick J. What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with an rmsd of 6 angstrom? Folding Des 1998;3:141-147.
23. Lee MS, Olson MA. Assessment of detection and refinement strategies for de novo protein structures using force field and statistical potentials. J Chem Theory Comput 2007;3:312-324.
24. Shen MY, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Prot Sci 2006;15:2507-2524.
25. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001;44:223-232.
26. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Stability scale and atomic solvation parameters extracted from 1023 mutation experiments. Proteins 2002;49:483-492.
27. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhu QQ, Zhou YQ. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J Med Chem 2005;48:2325-2335.
28. Feig M, Brooks CL, III. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions. Proteins 2002;49:232-245.
29. Lee MC, Duan Y. Distinguishing protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 2004;55:620-634.
30. Zhou Y, Zhou HY, Zhang C, Liu S. What is a desirable statistical energy function for proteins and how can it be obtained? Cell Biochem Biophys 2006;46:165-174.
31. Lee MC, Yang R, Duan Y. Comparison between generalized-born and Poisson-Boltzmann methods in physics-based scoring functions for protein structure prediction. J Mol Model 2005;12:101-110.
32. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:139-145.
33. Stumpff-Kane AW, Feig N. A correlation-based method for the enhancement of scoring functions on funnel-shaped energy landscapes. Prot Struct Funct Bioinform 2006;63:155-164.
34. Lu MY, Poon B, Ma JP. A new method for coarse-grained elastic normal-mode analysis. J Chem Theory Comput 2006;2:464-471.
35. Kidera A, Go N. Normal mode refinement-crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure. I. Theory and test by simulated diffraction data. J Mol Biol 1992;225:457-475.
36. Kidera A, Inaka K, Matsushima M, Go N. Normal mode refinement- crystallographic refinement of protein dynamic structure. II. Application to human lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1992;225:477-486.
37. Kidera A, Go N. Refinement of protein dynamic structure-normal mode refinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:3718-3722.
38. Bahar I, Rader AJ. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:586-592.
39. Lindahl E, Delarue M. Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:4496-4506.
40. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks CL. Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into low-resolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 2004;337:985-999.
41. Suhre K, Sanejouand YH. On the potential of normal-mode analysis for solving difficult molecular-replacement problems. Acta Cryst D Biol Cryst 2004;60:796-799.
42. Zhang M, White RA, Wang LQ, Goldman R, Kavraki L, Hassett B. Improving conformational searches by geometric screening. Bioinformatics 2005;21:624-630.
43. Zhang M, Kavraki LE. A new method for fast and accurate derivation of molecular conformations. J Chem Inform Comput Sci 2002;42:64-70.
44. Singh R, Berger B. Chaintweak: sampling from the neighbourhood of a protein conformation. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005;10:52-63.
45. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Size-independent comparison of protein 3-dimensional structures. Prot Struct Funct Genet 1995;22:273-283.
46. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Monte carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 1994;18:338-352.
47. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997;265:217-241.
48. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
49. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
50. Neria E, Fischer S, Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 1996;105:1902-1921.
51. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical-integration of cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints-molecular-dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327-341.
52. Nose S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys 1984;52:255-268.
53. Feig M, Karanicolas J, Brooks CL, III. MMTSB tool set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology. J Mol Graph Model 2004;22:377-395.