It takes a community to raise a hydrologist: The Modular Curriculum for Hydrologic Advancement (MOCHA)

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3405-3418

  Wagener, T ^a,b   Kelleher, C ^a   Weiler, M ^c   McGlynn, B ^d   Gooseff, M ^a   Marshall, L ^d   Meixner, T ^e   McGuire, K ^f   Gregg, S ^a   Sharma, P ^g   Zappe, S ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^d MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANGING CLIMATE; HYDROLOGICAL EXTREMES; HYDROLOGICAL SERVICES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; POPULATION PRESSURE;

HYDROLOGY; SURVEYS;

CURRICULA;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CURRICULUM; HIGHER EDUCATION; HOLISTIC APPROACH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; HYDROLOGY; LIFESTYLE; LITERATURE REVIEW; POPULATION PRESSURE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY; UNIVERSITY SECTOR; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84868531971     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3405-2012     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Aghakouchak, A. and Emad, H.: Application of a conceptual hydrologic model in teaching hydrologic processes, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 26, 63-973, 2010.
2. Alley, M.: The Craft of Scientific Presentations, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
3. Alley, M. and Neeley, K. A.: Rethinking the design of presentation slides: A case for sentence headlines and visual evidence, Tech. Commun., 52, 417-426, 2005. (Pubitemid 41687564)
4. Alley, M., Schreiber, M., Diesel, E., Ramsdell, K., and Borrego, M.:Increased Learning and attendance in resources geology through he combination of sentence-headline slides and active learning measures, Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 85-91, 2007.
5. Baker, E. L.: Principles for Scaling Up: Choosing, Measuring Effects,and PromotingWidespread Use of Educational Innovation, in: Scale-up in Education Volume I: Ideas in Principle, edited by: Schneider, B. and McDonald, S.-H., 37-54, Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2007.
6. Baraniuk, R. G., Burrus, C. S., Hendricks, B., Henry, G., Hero, A., Johnson, D. H., Jones, D. L., Nowak, R., Odegard, J., Potter, L., Reedstrom, R., Schniter, P., Selesnick, I., Williams, D., and Wilson, W.: Connexions: Education for a networked world, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP'02, Orlando, 4, 4144-4147, 2002.
7. Baraniuk, R. G., Burrus, C. S., Johnson, D. H., and Jones, D. L.: Connexions - Sharing knowledge and building communities in signal processing, IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., 21, 10-16, 2004.
8. Ben-zvi-Assarf, O. and Orion, N.: A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle, Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 366-373, 2005. (Pubitemid 41599984)
9. Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modeling - The primer, John Wiley & Sons, LTD, Chichester, UK, 2000.
10. Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modeling - The primer, 2nd Edn., John Wiley & Sons, LTD, Chichester, UK, 2010.
11. Boynton, M. A. and Hossain, F.: Improving engineering education outreach in rural counties through engineering risk analysis, ASCE J. Prof. Iss. Eng. Ed. Pr., 136, 224-232, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000026, 2010.
12. Bras, R. L.: Hydrology - An introduction to hydrologic sciences, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1990.
13. Brooks, K. N., Ffolliott, P. F., Gregersen, H. M., and DeBano, L. F.: Hydrology and the Management of Watersheds, 3rd Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, 2003.
14. Brutsaert,W.: Hydrology - An Introduction, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
15. Carlson, C. A.: Field Research as a Pedagogical Tool for Learning Hydrogeochemistry and Science Writing Skills, Journal of Geoscience Education, 47, 150-157, 1999. (Pubitemid 29319643)
16. Chow, V., Maidment, D., and Mays, L.: Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1988.
17. de Wet, A. P.: Integrating Field Observations with Physical and Computer Models in an Introductory Environmental-Geology Course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 42, 264-271, 1994.
18. Dickerson, D., Callahan, T. J., van Sickle, M., and Hay, G.: Students' conceptions of scale regarding groundwater. Journal of Geosciences Education, 53, 374-380, 2005. (Pubitemid 41599985)
19. Dickerson, D., Penick, J. E., Dawkins, K. R., Sickle, M. V.: Groundwaterin Science Education, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 45-61, 2006.
20. Dingman, S. L.: Physical Hydrology, 2nd Edn., Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2002.
21. Doran, G. T.: There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives, Manag. Rev., 70, 35-36, 1981.
22. Dunne, T. and Leopold, L.: Water in Environmental Planning, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1978.
23. Dunnivant, F. M., Brzenk, R., and Moore, A.: A Comprehensive Stream Study Designed for an Undergraduate Non-Majors Course in Earth Science, Journal of Geoscience Education, 47,158-165, 1999. (Pubitemid 29319644)
24. Eagleson, P. S.: Dynamic Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1970.
25. Eagleson, P. S.: Ecohydrology: Darwinian expression of vegetation form and function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,2005.
26. Eagleson, P. S., Brutsaert, W. H., Colbeck, S. C., Cummins, K. W., Dozier, J., Dunne, T., Edmond, J. M., Gupta, V. K., Jacoby, G. C., Manabe, S., Nicholson, S. E., Nielsen, D. R., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Rubin, J., Smith, J. L., Sposito, G., Swank, W. T., andZipser, E. J.: Opportunities in the Hydrologic Sciences, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1991.
27. Elshorbagy, A.: Learner-centred approach to teaching watershed hydrology using system dynamics, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 21, 1203- 1213, 2005. (Pubitemid 41771762)
28. Felder, R. M. and Brent, R.: Understanding student differences, J. Eng. Educ., 95, 57-72, 2005. (Pubitemid 40285757)
29. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education, Eng. Educ., 78, 674-681, 1988.
30. Firth, P.: The importance of water resources education for the next century, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 35, 487-492, 1999. (Pubitemid 29270643)
31. Garner, J. K., Alley, M., Gaudelli, A., and Zappe, S.: Common use of PowerPoint versus assertion evidence slide structure: a cognitive psychology perspective, Tech. Commun., 56, 331-345, 2009.
32. Garner, J. K., Alley, M. A., Sawarynski, L. E., Wolfe, K. L., and Zappe, S. E.: Comparison of Learning from Assertion-evidence slides appear to lead to better comprehension and recall of more complex concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education, Vancouver, Canada, 2011.
33. Groves, J. R. and Moody, D.W.: A survey of hydrology course content in North American universities, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 28, 615-621, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03181.x, 1992.
34. Henderson, C. and Dancy, M. H.: Increasing the Impact and Diffusionof STEM Education Innovations. Invited paper for the National Academy of Engineering, Center for the Advancementof Engineering Education Forum, Impact and Diffusionof Transformative Engineering Education Innovations, availableat: http://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=36304 (last access: September2012), 2010.
35. Hendricks, E. L.: Hydrology - An understanding of water in relation to earth processes requires collaboration of many disciplines,Science, 135, 699-705, 1962.
36. Hendriks, M. R.: Introduction to physical hydrology, Oxford UniversityPress, New York, NY, 2010.
37. Hewlett, J. D.: Principles of forest hydrology, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA, 1982.
38. Hornberger, G. M., Raffensperger, J. P., Wiberg, P. L., and Eshleman, K. N.: Elements of physical hydrology, Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, Baltimore, MD, 1998.
39. Hossain, F. and Huddleston, D.: A proposed computer-assisted graphics-based instruction scheme for stochastic theory in hydrologicalsciences, Computers in Education Journal, XVII, 16-25,2007. (Pubitemid 46713866)
40. Howe, C.W.: Preface to "A Creative Critique on U.S.Water Education",Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 139, 1-2, 2008.
41. Hudak, P. F.: Groundwater field station for geoscience students, J.Geogr., 98, 23-28, doi:10.1080/00221349908978850, 1999. (Pubitemid 29403014)
42. Hughes, D. A.: Hydrological education and training needs in sub-Saharan Africa: requirements, constraints and progress, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 861-871, doi:10.5194/hess-16-861-2012,2012.
43. James, L. D.: An historical perspective on water resources education, Water Resources Update, Universities Council onWater Resources, 91, 19-21, 1993.
44. Kastens, K. A., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., Mogk, D. W., Spangler, T. C., Stillings, N. A., and Titus, S.: How geoscientists think and learn, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 90, 265-266, 2009.
45. Kavetski, D. and Clark, M. P.: Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology:Approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis testing, Hydrol. Process., 25, 661-670, doi:10.1002/hyp.7899, 2011.
46. Keller, J.: Is PowerPoint the devil?, Chicago Tribune, 23 January 2004.
47. King, E. G., O'Donnell, F. C., and Caylor, K. K.: Reframing hydrology education to solve coupled human and environmental problems, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 7739-7759,doi:10.5194/hessd-9-7739-2012, 2012.
48. LeDee, O., Barnes, R., Emanuel, R., Fisher, P., Henkel, S., and Marlon, J.: Training a New Scientist to Meet the Challenges of a Changing Environment, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 92, p. 135, 2011.
49. Ledley, T. S.: Recommendations for making geoscience data accessible and usable in education, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 89, p. 291, doi:10.1029/ 2008EO320003, 2008.
50. Lee, G. K. and Cole, R. E.: From firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development,Organ. Sci., 14, 633-649, 2003.
51. Lynn Jr., L. E.: Teaching and learning with cases - A guidebook,Chatham House Publishers, New York, 1999.
52. MacDonald, L. H.: Developing a field component in hydrologic education, Water Resour. Bull., 29, 357-368, 1993.
53. Manduca, C. A., McMartin, F., and Mogk, D. W.: Pathways toProgress: A Vision and Plan for Developing the National METEDigital Library, available at: http://serc.carleton.edu/files/serc/pathways progress.pdf (last access: September 2012), 2001.
54. Manduca, C. A., Baer, E., Hancock, G., MacDonald, R. H., Patterson, S., Savina, M., and Wenner, J.: Making undergraduate geosciencequantitative, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 89, 149-150,2008.
55. McGuire, K. J. and Likens, G. E.: Historical roots of forest hydrology and biogeochemistry, in: Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions,edited by: Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T., EcologicalStudies 216, Springer, Berlin, 3-26, doi:10.1007/978-94- 007-1363-5 1, 2011.
56. McMartin, F.: Preliminary findings from science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education user study focus groups, available at: http://www.smete.org (last access: May 2005), 1999.
57. Merwade, V. and Ruddell, B. L.: Moving university hydrology education forward with community-based geoinformatics, data and modeling resources, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2393-2404, doi:10.5194/hess-16-2393-2012, 2012.
58. Mihelcic, J. R., Paterson, K. G., Phillips, L. D., Zhang, Q.,Watkins, D. W., Barkdoll, B., Fuchs, V. J., Fry, L. M., and Hokanson, D. R.: Educating Engineers in the Sustainable Futures Model with a Global Perspective, Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 25, 255-263, 2008.
59. Milano, C.: Go with the flow: a wave of water-related opportunities, Science Careers Magazine, AAAS, 2010.
60. Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?, Science, 319, 573- 574, 2008. (Pubitemid 351197047)
61. Mogk, D. W. and Lee, Z.: Addressing opportunities and challenges in evaluation and dissemination through creation of a national library for undergraduate science education, Geosciences Information Society Proceedings, 27, 17-22, 1997.
62. Mollinga, P. P.: Towards the transdisciplinary engineer: incorporating ecology, equity and democracy concerns into water professionals' attitudes, skills and knowledge, Irrig. Drain., 58, S195- S204, 2009.
63. Muramatsu, B.: The development of a national science, mathematics,engineering and technology education digital library:Lessons learned from NEEDS, in: Proceedings of the 2000 InternationalConference for Engineering Education, 13-17 August 000, Taipei, Taiwan, 2000.
64. Muramatsu, B., McMartin, F., and Agogino, A. M.: The developmentof a national science, mathematics, engineering and technology education digital library: Lessons learned from NEEDS, in: Proceedings of the 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference:October 2000, Kansas City, MO, 2000.
65. Nash, J. E., Eagleson, P. S., Philip, J. R., and van der Molen, W. H.:The education of hydrologists, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 35, 597-607, doi:10.1080/ 02626669009492466, 1990.
66. Pearce, A. R., Bierman, P. R., Druschel, G. K., Massey, C., Rizzo, D. M., Watzin, M. C., and Wemple, B. C.: Pitfalls and Successes of Developing an Interdisciplinary Watershed Field Science Course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 213-220, 2010.
67. Philip, J. R.: Hydrology and the real world, in: Advances in Theoretical Hydrology: A Tribute to James Dooge, edited by: O'Kane, J. P., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 201-207, 1992.
68. Prince, M. J. and Felder, R. M.: Inductive learning and teachingmethods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases, J. Eng. Educ., 95, 123-138, 2006.
69. Puzniak, J., McMartin, F., and Agogino, A.: Building a digital learning community for faculty on the internet, Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2000.
70. Rodhe, A.: Physical models for classroom teaching in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3075-3082, doi:10.5194/hess-16- 3075-2012, 2012.
71. Salvage, K., Graney, J., and Barker, J.: Watershed-Based Integration of Hydrology, Geochemistry, and Geophysics in an Environmental Geology Curriculum, Journal of Geoscience Education, 4, 141-148, 2004.
72. Schwenk, J., Hossain, F., and Huddleston, D.: A computer-aided visualization tool for stochastic theory education in water resources engineering, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 14, 1-14, 2009.
73. Shaffer, C. and Anundsen, K.: Creating community anywhere, Perigree Books, New York, NY, 1993.
74. Shaw, E. M., Beven, K. J., Chappell, N. A., and Lamb, R.: Hydrology in practice, 4th Edn., Taylor and Francis, New York, NY, 2010.
75. Shaw, S. B. and Walter, M. T.: Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarity in future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1269-1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16- 1269-2012, 2012.
76. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T.: Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices, J. Eng. Educ., 94, 87-101, 2005.
77. Sopper, W. E. and Lull, H. W.: Streamflow characteristics of physiographic units in the northeast, Water Resour. Res., 1, 115-124, doi:10.1029/WR001i001p00115, 1965.
78. Thompson, S. E, Harman, C. J., Schumer, R., Wilson, J. S., Basu, N. B., Brooks, P. D., Donner, S. D., Hassan, M. A., Packman, A. I., Rao, P. S. C., Troch, P. A., and Sivapalan, M.: Patterns, puzzles and people: implementing hydrologic synthesis, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3256-3266, 2011.
79. Trop, J. M., Krockover, G. H., and Ridgway, K. D.: Integration of field observations with laboratory modeling for understanding hydrologic processes in an undergraduate earth-science course, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 514-521, 2000.
80. Tufte, E. R.: The cognitive style of PowerPoint, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2003.
81. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Teaching aids in hydrology, edited by: Moore, W. L., The UNESCO Press, Paris, France, 1972.
82. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): The teaching of hydrology, Technical Papers in Hydrology 13, The UNESCO Press, Paris, France, 1974.
83. United States National Research Council: Opportunities in the Hydrologic Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1991.
84. van Vuren, G., Liebrand, J., and Vincent, L.: Debating the Water Professional of Tomorrow, Irrig. Drain., 58, S162-S167, 2009.
85. Wagener, T. and McIntyre, N.: Tools for teaching hydrological and environmental modeling, Computers in Education Journal, XVII, 16-26, 2007. (Pubitemid 47248536)
86. Wagener, T., Gupta, H. V., Carpenter, K., James, B., Vazquez, R., Sorooshian, S., and Shuttleworth, J.: A hydroarchive for the free exchange of hydrological software, Hydrol. Process., 18, 389- 391, doi:10.1002/hyp.5216, 2004. (Pubitemid 38258992)
87. Wagener, T., Weiler, M., McGlynn, B., rshall, L., McHale, M., Meixner, T., and McGuire, K.: Taking the pulse of hydrology education, Hydrol. Process., 21, 1789-1792, doi:10.1002/hyp.6766, 2007. (Pubitemid 47029412)
88. Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J., Gupta, H. V., Kumar, P., Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., and Wilson, J. S.: The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05301, doi:10.1029/2009WR008906, 2010.
89. Wampler, J. M.: Misconcepts - a column about errors in geoscience textbooks: Misconceptions of ground-water's capillary fringe, Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 460-462, 1997. (Pubitemid 127569845)
90. Wampler, J. M.: Misconceptions - a column about errors in geoscience textbooks: confusion about the role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle, Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 382-385, 2000. (Pubitemid 30446620)
91. Ward, A. D. and Trimble, S. W.: Environmental Hydrology, 2nd Edn., Lewis Publishers, 2003.
92. Whiteman,W. and Nygren, K. P.: Achieving the right balance: properly integrating mathematical software packages into engineering education, J. Eng. Educ., 89, 331-336, 2000.
93. Wilm, H. G.: The training of men in forest hydrology and watershed management, J. Forest., 55, 268-272, 1957.
94. Zimmerman, E.: Fresh starts - Hiring in hydrology resists the slump, New York Times, The New York Times Company, New York, 2009.