Electrophysiological potentials reveal cortical mechanisms for mental imagery, mental simulation, and grounded (embodied) cognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue SEP, 2012, Pages

  Schendan, Haline E ^a,b   Ganis, Giorgio ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodiment and grounded cognition; Event related potential; Face identification; Mental imagery; Object categorization; Semantic memory priming; Visual knowledge; Visual shape perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867056753     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00329     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Allison, T., Puce, A., Spencer, D. D., and Mccarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception I: potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 9, 415-430.
2. Anderson, N. D., and Wilson, H. R. (2005). The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Res. 45, 1815-1828.
3. Anderson, S. E., Chiu, E., Huette, S., and Spivey, M. J. (2011). On the temporal dynamics of language-mediated vision and vision-mediated language. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 137, 181-189.
4. Auchterlonie, S., Phillips, N. A., and Chertkow, H. (2002). Behavioral and electricalbrain measuresof semantic priming in patients with Alzheimer's disease: implications for access failure versus deterioration hypotheses. Brain Cogn. 48, 264-267.
5. Bach, P., Gunter, T. C., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., and Friederici, A. D. (2009). N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation. Soc. Neurosci. 4, 212-232.
6. Bajo, M. T. (1988). Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 14, 579-589.
7. Barrett, S. E., and Rugg, M. D. (1989). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces. Neu- ropsychologia 27, 913-922.
8. Barrett, S. E., and Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain Cogn. 14, 201-212.
9. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645.
10. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1281-1289.
11. Bentin, S., and McCarthy, G. (1994). The effects of immediate stimulus repetition on reaction time and event-related potentials in tasks of different complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 130-149.
12. Biggs, T. C., and Marmurek, H. H. C. (1990). Picture and word naming - is facilitation due to processing overlap. Am. J. Psychol. 103, 81-100.
13. Blackford, T., Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., and Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming. Cognition 123, 84-99.
14. Brown, A. S., Neblett, D. R., Jones, T. C., and Mitchell, D. B. (1991). Transfer of processing in repetition priming: some inappropriate findings. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17, 514-525.
15. Bub, D. N., and Masson, M. E. (2010). On the nature of hand-action representations evoked during written sentence comprehension. Cognition 116, 394-408.
16. Bullier, J. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 36, 96-107.
17. Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., and Schweinberger, S. R. (2011). Mental representations of familiar faces. Br. J. Psychol. 102, 943-958.
18. Cabeza, R., Burton, A. M., Kelly, S. W., and Akamatsu, S. (1997). Investigating the relation between imagery and perception: evidence from face priming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 50, 274-289.
19. Carr, T. H., Mccauley, C., Sperber, R. D., and Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8, 757-777.
20. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Lang. Cogn. 2, 79-116.
21. Clarke, A., Taylor, K. I., and Tyler, L. K. (2011). The evolution of meaning: spatio-temporal dynamics of visual object recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 1887-1899.
22. Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82, 407-428.
23. Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., and Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and lowpass spatial filtering on face identification. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 602-612.
24. Craver-Lemley, C., and Reeves, A. (1992). How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychol. Rev. 99, 633-649.
25. David, O., Harrison, L., and Friston, K. J. (2005). Modeling event-related responses in the brain. Neuroimage 25, 756-770.
26. David, O., Kiebel, S. J., Harrison, L. M., Mattout, J., Kilner, J. M., and Friston, K. J. (2006). Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 30, 1255-1272.
27. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., and Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psy- chophysiology 41, 665-678.
28. Dobel, C., Junghofer, M., Breitenstein, C., Klauke, B., Knecht, S., Pantev, C., and Zwitserlood, P. (2010). New names for known things: on the association of novel word forms with existing semantic information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1251-1261.
29. Doniger, G. M., Foxe, J. J., Murray, M. M., Higgins, B. A., Snodgrass, J. G., Schroeder, C. E., and Javitt, D. C. (2000). Activation timecourse of ventral visual stream objectrecognition areas: high density electrical mapping of perceptual closure processes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 615-621.
30. Doniger, G. M., Foxe, J. J., Schroeder, C. E., Murray, M. M., Higgins, B. A., and Javitt, D. C. (2001). Visual perceptual learning in human object recognition areas: a repetition priming study using high-density electrical mapping. Neuroimage 13, 305-313.
31. Downing, P. E., Chan, A. W., Peelen, M. V., Dodds, C. M., and Kanwisher, N. (2006). Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1453-1461.
32. Eddy, M. D., and Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for size invariance in masked picture repetition priming. Brain Cogn. 71, 397-409.
33. Eddy, M. D., and Holcomb, P. J. (2010). The temporal dynamics of masked repetition picture priming effects: manipulations of stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) and prime duration. Brain Res. 1340, 24-39.
34. Eddy, M. D., and Holcomb, P. J. (2011). Invariance to rotation in depth measured by masked repetition priming is dependent on prime duration. Brain Res. 1424, 38-52.
35. Eddy, M. D., Schmid, A., and Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: a new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. Psychophysiology 43, 564-568.
36. Eddy, M. D., Schnyer, D., Schmid, A., and Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Spatial dynamics of masked picture repetition effects. Neuroimage 34, 1723-1732.
37. Farah, M. J., Peronnet, F., Gonon, M. A., and Giard, M. H. (1988). Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 248-257.
38. Federmeier, K. D., and Kutas, M. (2001). Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27, 202-224.
39. Federmeier, K. D., and Kutas, M. (2002). Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 40, 730-747.
40. Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1431-1444.
41. Fischer, M. H., and Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 61, 825-850.
42. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Forster, K.I., andDavis, C.(1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. J. Exp. Psy- chol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10, 680-698.
44. Franklin, M. S., Dien, J., Neely, J. H., Huber, E., and Waterson, L. D. (2007). Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 1053-1068.
45. Freyd, J. J., and Finke, R. A. (1984). Facilitation of length discrimination using real and imaged context frames. Am. J. Psychol. 97, 323-341.
46. Ganis, G., and Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). "Multiple mechanisms of top-down processing in vision," in Represen- tation and Brain, ed. S. Funahashi (Tokyo: Springer Verlag), 21-45.
47. Ganis, G., and Kutas, M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 16, 123-144
48. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., and Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for common sense: an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J. Cogn. Neu- rosci. 8, 89-106.
49. Ganis, G., and Schendan, H. E. (2008). Visual mental imagery and perception produce opposite adaptation effects on early brain potentials. Neuroimage 42, 1714-1727.
50. Ganis, G., and Schendan, H. E. (2011). Mental imagery. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2, 239-252.
51. Ganis, G., Schendan, H. E., and Kosslyn, S. M. (2007). Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization. Neuroimage 34, 384-398.
52. Ganis, G., Smith, D., and Schendan, H. E. (2012). The N170, not the P1, indexes the earliest time for categorical perception of faces, regardless of interstimulus variance. Neuroimage 62, 1563-1574.
53. Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., Mast, F. W., and Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Visual imagery in cerebral visual dysfunction. Neurol. Clin. 21, 631-646.
54. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., and Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulusspecific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 10, 14-23.
55. Hasson, U., Harel, M., Levy, I., and Malach, R. (2003). Largescale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas. Neuron 37, 1027-1041.
56. Heil, M. (2002). The functional significance of ERP effects during mental rotation. Psychophysiology 39, 535-545.
57. Henson, R. N., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T., Otten, L. J., Quayle, A., and Rugg, M. D. (2003). Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb. Cortex 13, 793-805.
58. Henson, R. N., Rylands, A., Ross, E., Vuilleumeir, P., and Rugg, M. D. (2004). The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage 21, 1674-1689.
59. Herholz, S. C., Halpern, A. R., and Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Neuronal correlates of perception, imagery, and memory for familiar tunes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 1382-1397.
60. Hirschfeld, G., Feldker, K., and Zwitserlood, P. (2012). Listening to "flying ducks": individual differences in sentence-picture verification investigated with ERPs. Psychophysiology 49, 312-321.
61. Hirschfeld, G., and Zwitserlood, P. (2011). How vision is shaped by language comprehension - top-down feedback based on low-spatial frequencies. Brain Res. 1377, 78-83.
62. Holcomb, P. J. (2003). "ERPSystem," 2.0a ed. Medford: Tufts University.
63. Holcomb, P. J., and McPherson, W. B. (1994). Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain Cogn. 24, 259-276.
64. Jeffreys, D. A. (1996). Evoked potential studies of face and object processing. Vis. Cogn. 3, 1-38.
65. Johnson, J. S., and Olshausen, B. A. (2003). Time course of neural signatures of object recognition. J. Vis. 3, 499-512.
66. Johnson, J. S., and Olshausen, B. A. (2005). The earliest EEG signatures of object recognition in a cuedtarget task are postsensory. J. Vis. 5, 299-312.
67. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Kazmerski, V. A., and Friedman, D. (1997). Old/new differences in direct and indirect memory tests using pictures and words in withinand cross-form conditions: event-related potential and behavioral measures. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 5, 255-272.
69. Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., and Wiley, C. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang. 107, 16-43.
70. Kiefer, M., Sim, E. J., Helbig, H., and Graf, M. (2011). Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 1864-1874.
71. Koester, D., and Schiller, N. O. (2008). Morphological priming in overt language production: electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. Neuroim- age 42, 1622-1630.
72. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Chabris, C. F., Rauch, S. L., and Anderson, A. K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. Brain 117, 1055-1071.
74. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., and Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 635-642.
75. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., and Ganis, G. (2006). The Case for Men- tal Imagery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
76. Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., and Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 140, 14-34.
77. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., and Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style. Mem. Cognit. 33, 710-726.
78. Kutas, M., and Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 621-647.
79. Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., and Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 920-933.
80. Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F., and Wilson, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1386-1390.
81. Luck, S. J. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Mahon, B.Z., andCaramazza, A.(2009). Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 27-51.
83. Marinkovic, K., Dhond, R. P., Dale, A. M., Glessner, M., Carr, V., and Halgren, E. (2003). Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing. Neu- ron 38, 487-497.
84. McDermott, K. B., and Roediger, H. L. III. (1994). Effects of imagery on perceptual implicit memory tests. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 1379-1390.
85. McPherson, W. B., and Holcomb, P. J. (1999). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psy- chophysiology 36, 53-65.
86. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., and Vigliocco, G. (2011). Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48, 788-804.
87. Michelon, P., and Koenig, O. (2002). On the relationship between imagery and visual perception:evidence from priming studies. Eur. J. Cogn. Psy- chol. 14, 161-184.
88. Michelon, P., Snyder, A. Z., Buckner, R. L., Mcavoy, M., and Zacks, J. M. (2003). Neural correlates of incongruous visual information. An event-related fMRI study. Neuroim- age 19, 1612-1626.
89. Michelon, P., and Zacks, J. M. (2003). What is primed in priming from imagery? Psychol. Res. 67, 71-79.
90. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J.Verbal Learn.Verbal Behav. 16, 519-533.
91. Morton, J. (1979). "Facilitation in word recognition: experiments causing change in the Logogen model," in Proceedings of the Conference on the Processing of Visible Language, eds P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, and H. Bouma (New York: Plenum), 259- 268.
92. Moulton, S. T., and Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1273-1280.
93. Nemrodov, D., and Itier, R. J. (2012). Is the rapid adaptation paradigm too rapid? Implications for face and object processing. Neuroimage 61, 812-822.
94. Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., and Penney, T. B. (2005). Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: an electrophysiological exploration. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22, 265-288.
95. Neumann, M. F., and Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load. Brain Res. 1239, 181-190.
96. Nielsen-Bohlman, L., and Knight, R. T. (1994). Electrophysiological dissociation of rapid memory mechanisms in humans. Neuroreport 5, 1517-1521.
97. O'Hare, A. J., Dien, J., Waterson, L. D., and Savage, C. R. (2008). Activation of the posterior cingulate by semantic priming: a co-registered ERP/fMRI study. Brain Res. 1189, 97-114.
98. Paivio, A., and Sadoski, M. (2011). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: commentary on Elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cogn. Sci. 35, 198-209.
99. Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2002). Standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24, 5-12.
100. Peterson, M. J., and Graham, S. E. (1974). Visual detection and visual imagery. J. Exp. Psychol. 103, 509-514.
101. Philiastides, M. G., Ratcliff, R., and Sajda, P. (2006). Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: a timing diagram. J. Neurosci. 26, 8965-8975.
102. Philiastides, M. G., and Sajda, P. (2006). Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 16, 509-518.
103. Philiastides, M. G., and Sajda, P. (2007). EEG-informed fMRI reveals spatiotemporal characteristics of perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 27, 13082-13091.
104. Puce, A., Allison, T., and Mccarthy, G. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception III: effects of top-down processing on facespecific potentials. Cereb. Cortex 9, 445-458.
105. Puce, A., and Perrett, D. (2003). Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 435-445.
106. Pulvermuller, F. (1999). Words in the brain'slanguage. Behav.Brain Sci. 22, 253-279; discussion 280-336.
107. Pylyshyn, Z. (2003). Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain? Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 7, 113-118.
108. Rossell, S. L., Price, C. J., and Nobre, A. C. (2003). The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsy- chologia 41, 550-564
109. Rugg, M. D., and Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11, 251-257.
110. Rumiati, R. I., Papeo, L., and Corradi-Dell'acqua, C. (2010). Higher-level motor processes.Ann. N.Y.Acad. Sci. 1191, 219-241.
111. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., and Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 39-60.
112. Schacter, D. L., Wig, G. S., and Stevens, W. D. (2007). Reductions in cortical activity during priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 171-176.
113. Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., and Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology 35, 240-251.
114. Schendan, H. E., Kanwisher, N. G., and Kutas, M. (1997). Early brain potentials link repetition blindness, priming and novelty detection. Neurore- port 8, 1943-1948.
115. Schendan, H. E., and Kutas, M. (2002). Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification. Neuropsychologia 40, 931-945.
116. Schendan, H. E., and Kutas, M. (2003). Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 111-135.
117. Schendan, H. E., and Kutas, M. (2007). Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 734-749.
118. Schendan, H. E., and Lucia, L. C. (2009). Visual object cognition precedes but also temporally overlaps mental rotation. Brain Res. 1294, 91-105.
119. Schendan, H. E., and Lucia, L. C. (2010). Object-sensitive activity reflects earlier perceptual and later cognitive processing of visual objects between 95 and 500 ms. Brain Res. 1329, 124-141.
120. Schendan, H. E., and Maher, S. M. (2009). Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms. Neuroimage 44, 1423-1438.
121. Schendan, H. E., and Stern, C. E. (2008). Where vision meets memory: prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1695-1711.
122. Scott, L. S., Tanaka, J. W., Sheinberg, D. L., and Curran, T. (2006). A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1453-1465.
123. Sehatpour, P., Molholm, S., Javitt, D. C., and Foxe, J. J. (2006). Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: an integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of "closure" processes. Neuroimage 29, 605-618.
124. Sehatpour, P., Molholm, S., Schwartz, T. H., Mahoney, J. R., Mehta, A. D., Javitt, D. C., Stanton, P. K., and Foxe, J. J. (2008). A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal-occipitalhippocampal brain network during visual object processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4399-4404.
125. Sitnikova, T., Goff, D., and Kuperberg, G. R. (2009). Neurocognitive abnormalities during comprehension of real-world goal-directed behaviors in schizophrenia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 118, 256-277.
126. Sitnikova, T., Perrone, C., Goff, D., and Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). Neurocognitive mechanisms of conceptual processing in healthy adults and patients with schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 75, 86-99.
127. Spironelli, C., Galfano, G., Umilta, C., and Angrilli, A. (2011). Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP shortterm plastic modulation. Int. J. Psy- chophysiol. 82, 217-224.
128. Stanfield, R.A., and Zwaan, R.A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychol. Sci. 12, 153-156.
129. Thierry, G., Martin, C. D., Downing, P., and Pegna, A. J. (2007). Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 505-511.
130. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B., and Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science 311, 670-674.
131. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 830-846.
132. Tulving, E., and Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psy- chol. Rev. 80, 359-380.
133. Vigliocco, G., Warren, J., Siri, S., Arciuli, J., Scott, S., and Wise, R. (2006). The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1790-1796.
134. Vogel, E. K., and Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37, 190-203.
135. Voss, J. L., Schendan, H. E., and Paller, K. A. (2010). Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. Neuroimage 49, 2879-2889.
136. Warren, C., and Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming on picture recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 73, 117-129.
137. Wassenburg, S. I., and Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Readers routinely represent implied object rotation: the role of visual experience. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 63, 1665-1670.
138. Wilson, H. R., and Humanski, R. A. (1993). Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain control.Vision Res. 33, 1133-1149.
139. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 625-636.
140. Zhang, X. L., Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., Wang, W. Y., and Litke, A. (1995). Event related potentials during object recognition tasks. Brain Res. Bull. 38, 531-538.
141. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., and Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol. Sci. 13, 168-171.