Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: Evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1864-1874

  Kiefer, Markus ^a   Sim, Eun Jin ^a   Helbig, Hannah ^b   Graf, Markus ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957930598     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21543     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Amazeen, E. L., & DaSilva, F. (2005). Psychophysical test for the independence of perception and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance, 31, 170-182.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609; discussion 610-660.
4. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
5. Bertrand, O., Perrin, F., & Pernier, J. A. (1985). A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 462-464.
6. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
7. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
8. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
9. Compton, P., Grossenbacher, P., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1991). A cognitive-anatomical approach to attention in lexical access. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 304-312.
10. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 218-228.
11. Desanghere, L., & Marotta, J. J. (2008). The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 187, 595-601.
12. Desimone, R., Albright, T. D., Gross, C. G., & Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2051-2062.
13. Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for "common sense": An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89-106.
14. Gerlach, C. (2007). A review of functional imaging studies on category specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 296-314.
15. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (1999). Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Brain, 122, 2159-2170.
16. Goodale, M. A., & Haffenden, A. M. (2003). Interactions between the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing. Advances in Neurology, 93, 249-267.
17. Graf, M. (2006). Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 920-945.
18. Graf, M., Kaping, D., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2005). Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 214-221.
19. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 649-677.
20. Hamalainen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: Minimum norm estimates. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 32, 35-42.
21. Hauk, O. (2004). Keep it simple: A case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage, 21, 1612-1621.
22. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301-307.
23. Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Cooper-Pye, E., Pulvermuller, F., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). How the camel lost its hump: The impact of object typicality on event-related potential signals in object decision. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1338-1353.
24. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 191-201.
25. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221-228.
26. Helbig, H. B., Steinwender, J., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 251-258.
27. Hoenig, K., Sim, E.-J., Bochev, V., Herrnberger, B., & Kiefer, M. (2008). Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: Dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motion and motor-related areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1799-1814.
28. Hommel, B., Muesseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
29. Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856-868.
30. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
31. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measures designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582-1589.
32. Johnson, J. S., & Olshausen, B. A. (2003). Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. Journal of Vision, 3, 499-512.
33. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of categoryspecific effects in object categorization: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
34. Kiefer, M. (2005). Repetition priming modulates categoryrelated effects on event-related potentials: Further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 199-211.
35. Kiefer, M., Schuch, S., Schenck, W., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Mood states modulate activity in semantic brain areas during emotional word encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1516-1530.
36. Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. (2008). The sound of concepts: Four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12224-12230.
37. Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Liebich, S., Hauk, O., & Tanaka, J. W. (2007). Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 525-542.
38. Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2001). The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 469-471.
39. Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., & Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 64, 377-408.
40. Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762-1776.
41. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
43. Lancaster, J. L., Rainey, L. H., Summerlin, J. L., Freitas, C. S., Fox, P. T., Evans, A. C., et al. (1997). Automated labeling of the human brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 238-242.
44. Lancaster, J. L., Woldorff, M. G., Parsons, L. M., Liotti, M., Freitas, C. S., Rainey, L., et al. (2000). Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 120-131.
45. Levelt, W. J., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. (1998). An MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 553-567.
46. Liu, J., Harris, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2002). Stages of processing in face perception: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 910-916.
47. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
48. Lupker, S. J. (1985). Relatedness effects in word and picture naming: Parallels, differences, and structural implications. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 109-143). London: Erlbaum.
49. Makeig, S., Bell, A. J., Jung, T.-P., Ghahremani, D., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 94, 10979-10984.
50. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulation of sensoryevoked brain potentials provide evidence for changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
51. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
52. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
53. Milner, A. D., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2001). Direct and indirect visual routes to action. In B. De Gelder, E. H. F. De Haan, & C. A. Heywood (Eds.), Out of mind: Varieties of unconscious processes (pp. 241-264). London: Oxford University Press.
54. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Moss, H. E., Rodd, J. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2005). Anteromedial temporal cortex supports finegrained differentiation among objects. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 616-627.
56. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1090-1098.
57. Noppeney, U., Price, C. J., Penny, W. D., & Friston, K. J. (2006). Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 437-445.
58. Nunez, P. L. (1981). Electrical fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
60. Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 976-987.
61. Poliakoff, E., Galpin, A., Dick, J., Moore, P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease. NeuroReport, 18, 483-487.
62. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576-582.
63. Pulvermüller, F., Lutzenberger, W., & Preissl, H. (1999). Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: Evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 497-506.
64. Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 884-892.
65. Rumanti, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 631-647.
66. Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarityin- topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
67. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-521.
68. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
69. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Zwaan, R. A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The functional role of motor activation in language processing: Motor cortical oscillations support lexical- semantic retrieval. Neuroimage, 50, 665-677.
71. Vandenberghe, R., Price, C., Wise, R., Josephs, Q., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature, 383, 254-256.
72. Verleger, R., Sprenger, A., Gebauer, S., Fritzmannova, M., Friedrich, M., Kraft, S., et al. (2009). On why left events are the right ones: Neural mechanisms underlying the left-hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 474-488.
73. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge. Brain, 110, 1273-1296.