On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 830-846

  Tucker, Mike ^a   Ellis, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032088919     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990a). Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 64, 164-178.
2. Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990b). Preparation for movement: Neural representation of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 64, 133-150.
3. Alluisi, E. A., & Warm, J. S. (1990). Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 3-30). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Andersen, R. A. (1987). Inferior parietal lobule in spatial perception and visuomotor integration. In V. B. Mountcastle, F. Plum, & S. R. Geiger (Eds.), Handbook of physiology. Section 1: The nervous system. Vol. V: Higher functions of the brain, Part 2 (pp. 483-518). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.
5. Anzola, G. P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295-302.
6. Arbib, M. A. (1990). Schemas for the control of hand movements: An essay on cortical localization. In M. A. Goodale (Ed.), Vision and action: The control of grasping (pp. 204-241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Bauer, D. W., & Miller, J. (1982). Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 34A, 367-380.
8. Bisiach, E. (1993). Mental representation in unilateral neglect and related disorders: The Twentieth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A(3), 435-461.
9. Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
10. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
11. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
12. Georgopoulos, A. P. (1991). Higher order motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 14, 361-377.
13. Georgopoulos, A. P. (1992). The motor cortex: A changing perspective. In R. Caminiti, P. B. Johnson, & Y. Burnod (Eds.), Control of arm movement in space: Neurophysiological and computational approaches (pp. 175-183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Georgopoulos, A. P., Schwartz, A. B., & Kettner, R. E. (1986). Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, 233, 1416-1419.
15. Goldberg, M. E., & Seagraves, M. A. (1987). Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 25(1A), 107-118.
16. Goodale, M. A. (1993). Visual pathways supporting perception and action in the primate cerebral cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 3, 578-585.
17. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, D. A. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in the Neurosciences 15(1), 20-25.
18. Goodale, M. A., Milner, D. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349(10), 154-156.
19. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
20. Hommel, B. (1994a). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research, 56, 179-184.
21. Hommel, B. (1994b). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
22. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
23. Iberall, T., Bingham, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1986). Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In H. Heuer & C. From (Eds.), Experimental Brain Research Series 15 (pp. 158-173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24. Jakobson, L. S., Archibald, Y. M., Carey, D. P., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 29, 803-809.
25. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental co-ordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 153-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 2, 187-202.
27. Jeannerod, M., Paulignan, Y., Mackenzie, C., & Marteniuk, R. M. (1992). Parallel visuomotor processing in human prehension. In R. Caminiti, P. B. Johnson, & Y. Burnod (Eds.), Control of arm movement in space: Neurophysiological and computational approaches (pp. 27-44). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Kalaska, J., & Crammond, D. (1992). Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. Science, 255, 1517-1523.
29. Klatzky, R. L., Fikes, T. G., & Pelligrino, J. W. (1995). Planning for hand shape and arm transport when reaching for objects. Acta Psychologica, 88, 209-232.
30. Klatzky, R. L., Pelligrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 56-77.
31. Klatzky, R. L., Pelligrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Memory & Cognition, 21(3), 253-270.
32. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
33. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
34. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
35. Lhermite, F. (1983). Utilisation behavior and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
36. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
37. MacKay, W. A., & Crammond, D. J. (1989). Cortical modification of sensorimotor linkages in relation to intended action. In W. A. Hershberger (Ed.), Volitional action (pp. 169-193). Elsevier: North Holland.
38. Michaels, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 231-240.
39. Michaels, C. F. (1989). S-R compatibilities depend on eccentricities of responding hand. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 263-272.
40. Michaels, C. F. (1993). Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: A reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1121-1127.
41. Milner, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (1993). Visual pathways to perception and action. In T. P. Hicks, S. Molotchnikoff, & T. Ono (Eds.), The visually responsive neuron: From basic neurophysiology to behavior. Progress in brain research (Vol. 95, pp. 317-338). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
42. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 231-240.
43. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research, 56, 144-150.
44. Perenin, M. T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Optic ataxia: A specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, 111, 643-674.
45. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Research on stimulus-response compatibility: Toward a comprehensive account. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 483-494). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
46. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
47. Requin, J., & Riehle, A. (1995). Neural correlates of partial transmission of sensorimotor information in the cerebral cortex. Acta Psychologica, 90, 81-95.
48. Requin, J., Riehle, A., & Seal, J. (1993). Neuronal networks for movement preparation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 745-769). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (1989). Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 437-454.
50. Rizzolatti, G., Gentilucci, M., & Matelli, M. (1985). Selective spatial attention: One center, one circuit or many circuits? In M. Posner (Ed.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 251-265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
52. Robinson, D. A. (1992). Implications of neural networks for how we think about brain function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 644-655.
53. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
54. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. D., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Rumiati, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 631-647.
56. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Mine, S., & Murata, A. (1992). Hand movement related neurons of the posterior parietal cortex of the monkey: Their role in the visual guidance of hand movements. In R. Caminiti, P. B. Johnson, & Y. Burnod (Eds.), Control of arm movement in space: Neurophysiological and computational approaches (pp. 185-198). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
57. Shulman, H. G., & McConkie, G. W. (1973). S-R compatibility, response discriminability, and response codes in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 375-378.
58. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
59. Stoffer, T. H., & Yakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 151-162.
60. Taira, M., Mine, S., Georgopoulos, A. P., Murata, A., & Sakata, H. (1990). Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 29-36.
61. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
62. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
63. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355-366.