A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1453-1465

  Scott, Lisa S ^a,d   Tanaka, James W ^b   Sheinberg, David L ^c   Curran, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIPOLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 33749435956     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1453     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
2. Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-54.
3. Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 32, 29-73.
4. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional view point invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
5. Busey, T. A., & Vanderkolk, J. R. (2005). Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Vision Research, 45, 431-448.
6. Carmel, D., & Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1-29.
7. Collin, C. A., & McMullen, P. (2005). Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 354-364.
8. Curran, T., Tanaka, J. W., & Weiskopf, D. M. (2002). An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 1-18.
9. Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport, 11, 2319-2324.
10. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
11. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2002). Does subordinate-level categorization engage the functionally-defined face area? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 143-163.
12. Grill-Spector, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Visual recognition: As soon as you know it is there, you know what it is. Psychological Science, 16, 152-160.
13. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004a). Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. Neuroimage, 21, 1518-1532.
14. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004b). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.
15. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
16. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.
17. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
18. Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621.
19. Murphy, G. L., & Brownell, H. H. (1985). Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 70-84.
20. Nguyen, N., & Cottrell, G. W. (2005). Owls and wading birds: Generalization gradients in expertise. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Cognitive Science Conference, La Stresa, Italy (pp. 1636-1641). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000). Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1199-1204.
22. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 162-168.
23. Rossion, B., Curran, T., & Gauthier, I. (2002). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85, 189-196.
24. Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Devolder, A., Bodart, J. M., Crommelinck, M., De Gelder, B., & Zoontjes, R. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 793-802.
25. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250-257.
26. Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937-951.
27. Scherg, M., & Berg, P. (1996). New concepts of brain source imaging and localization. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement, 46, 127-137.
28. Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex, 39, 9-30.
29. Schweinberger, S. R., Huddy, V., & Burton, M. (2004). N250r: A face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. NeuroReport, 15, 1501-1505.
30. Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Burton, M., & Kaufmann, J. (2002). Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2057-2073.
31. Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edge: Evidence for time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200.
32. Srinivasan, R., Nunez, P. L., Silberstein, R. B., Tucker, D. M., & Cadusch, P. J. (1996). Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline-Laplacians to estimate cortical potentials. Brain Topography, 8, 355-366.
33. Tanaka, J. W. (2001). The entry point of face recognition: Evidence for face expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534-543.
34. Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43-47.
35. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488-1497.
36. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2005). The training and transfer of real-world, perceptual expertise. Psychological Science, 16, 145-151.
37. Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457-482.
38. Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154-163.
39. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme.
40. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169-197.