The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 153-156

  Stanfield, Robert A ^a   Zwaan, Rolf A ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0035286860     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-277.
2. Barsalou, L.W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61-80.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
4. Christou, C.G., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
5. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
6. Dror, I.E., & Kosslyn, S.M. (1998). Age degradation in top-down processing: Identifying objects from canonical and noncanonical viewpoints. Experimental Aging Research, 24, 203-216.
7. Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
10. Glenberg, A.M., & Robertson, D.A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
11. Glenberg, A.M., & Robertson, D.A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-101.
12. Glenberg, A.M., Robertson, D.A., Jansen, J.L., & Johnson-Glenberg, M.C. (1999). Not propositions. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 19-33.
13. Glucksberg, S., Trabasso, T., & Wald, J. (1973). Linguistic structure and mental operations. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 338-370.
14. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
15. Kaschak, M.P., & Glenberg, A.M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical construction in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 508-529.
16. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kosslyn, S.M., Alpert, N.M., Thompson, W.L., Chabris, C.E., Rauch, S.L., & Anderson, A.K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain, 117, 1055-1071.
18. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G.W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395-416.
19. MacWhinney, B. (1998). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.). The emergence of language (pp. 213-256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Morrow, D.G., Greenspan, S.L., & Bower, G.H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165-187.
21. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
23. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A.D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
24. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1981 ). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16-45.
25. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
26. Raaijmakers, J.G., Schrijnemakers, J.M.C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-etfecl fallacy" Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-1-26.
27. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
28. Stanfield, R.A. (2000). The effects of verbal context on picture recognition. Unpublished master's thesis. Florida State University, Tallahassee.
29. Thurstone, L.L., & Jeffreys, T.E. (1956). Flags: A test of space thinking. Chicago: Chicago Industry Service.
30. van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
31. Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J., & Whitten, S.N. (2000). The presence of an event in the narrated situation effects its activation. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1022-1028.
32. Zwaan, R.A., & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychology Bulletin, 123, 162-185.