Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300

Psychophysiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 665-678

  Dien, Joseph ^a,b   Spencer, Kevin M ^a,c   Donchin, Emanuel ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Information processing; Novelty P3; P300; PCA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONOTROPISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL CHRONOMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE SELECTION TIME; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WAVEFORM;

EID: 4644275613     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00193.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Barcelo, F., Periañez, J. A., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Think differently: A brain orienting response to task novelty. NeuroReport, 13, 1887-1892.
2. Bashore, T. R., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Older age, traumatic brain injury, and cognitive slowing: Some convergent and divergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 151-198.
3. Brunia, C. H. (1993). Waiting in readiness: Gating in attention and motor preparation. Psychophysiology, 30, 327-339.
4. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
5. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
6. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30.
7. Courchesne, E. (1978). Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: Long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 754-766.
8. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
9. Cycowicz, Y. M., & Friedman, D. (1998). Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds. Brain and Cognition, 36, 30-51.
10. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F. M., Cohen, L. G., Kennedy, B. P., & West, W. C., et al. (1998). Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 9, 787-791.
11. Dien, J. (1998). Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 11, 43-55.
12. Dien, J., Beal. D., & Berg, P. (2003). Optimizing principal components analysis for event-related potential analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Dien, J., & Santuzzi, A. M. (in press). Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In T. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2003). Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 637-650.
15. Dien, J., Tucker, D. M., Potts, G., & Hartry, A. (1997). Localization of auditory evoked potentials related to selective intermodal attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 799-823.
16. Donald, M. W. (1979). Limits on current theories of transient evoked potentials. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Cognitive components in cerebral event-related potentials and effective attention (pp. 187-189). Basel: Karger.
17. Donchin, E. (1966). A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, BME-13, 131-139.
18. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise, surprise. Psychoplosiology, 18, 493-513.
19. Donchin, E. (1982). The relevance of dissociations and the irrelevance of dissociationism: A reply to Schwartz and Pritchard. Psychophysiology, 19, 457-463.
20. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
21. Donchin, E., & Heffley, E. (1979). Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review, In D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary, perspectives in event-related potential research EPA 600/9-77-043 (pp. 555-572). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. Donchin, E., Ritter, W., & McCallum, W. C. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, & S. H. Koslow (Eds.), Brain event-related potentials in man (pp. 349-441). New York: Academic Press.
23. Donchin, E., Spencer, K. M., & Dien, J. (1997). The varieties of deviant experience: ERP manifestations of deviance processors. In G. J. M. van Boxtel & K. B. E. Bocker (Eds.), Brain and behavior: Past, present, and future (pp. 67-91). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
24. Duncan-Johnson, C. C. (1981). P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology, 18, 207-215.
25. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940.
26. Eimer, M. (1999). Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. Psychophysiology, 36, 491-503.
27. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
28. Fabiani, M., & Friedman, D. (1995). Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: The novelty oddball. Psychophysiology, 32, 579-594.
29. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Karis, D., & Donchin, E. (1987). Definition, identification, and reliability of measurement of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. Advances in Psychophysiology, 2, 1-78.
30. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoorman, J. (1993). Late visual and auditory ERP components and choice reaction time. Biological Psychology, 35, 201-224.
31. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoorman, J. (1994). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 148-160.
32. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 96, 36-43.
33. Fletcher, E. M., Kussmaul, C. L., & Mangun, G. R. (1996). Estimation of interpolation errors in scalp topographic mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 98, 422-434.
34. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
35. Fraisse, P. (1969). Why is naming longer than reading? Acta Psychologica, 30, 96-103.
36. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 25, 355-373.
37. Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., & Hunt, G. (2003). Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 40, 198-208.
38. Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of Box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 885-891.
39. Goldstein, A., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2002). The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781-790.
40. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
41. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1989). A procedure for using multi-electrode information in the analysis of components of the event-related potential: Vector filter. Psychophysiology, 26, 222-232.
42. Hamm, J. P., Johnson, B. W., & Kirk, I. J. (2002). Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1339-1350.
43. Harter, M. R., & Aine, C. J. (1984). Brain mechanisms of visual selective attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 293-321). New York: Academic Press.
44. Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65-70.
45. Hillyard, S. A., & Munte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 185-198.
46. Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., & Hoormann, J. (1995). Effects of attention and time-pressure on P300 subcomponents and implications for mental workload research. Biological Psychology, 40, 73-81.
47. Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 438-446.
48. Houlihan, M. E., Pritchard, W. S., & Robinson, J. H. (1996). The time course effects of smoking on stimulus evaluation and response selection. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 310-318.
49. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.
50. Johnson, R., Jr. (1989a). Auditory and visual P300s in temporal lobectomy patients: Evidence for modality-dependent generators. Psychophysiology, 26, 633-650.
51. Johnson, R., Jr. (1989b). Developmental evidence for modality-dependent P300 generators: A normative study. Psychophysiology, 26, 651-667.
52. Johnson, R., Jr. (1993). On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 30, 90-97.
53. Johnson, R., Jr., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology, 17, 167-178.
54. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1998). Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33.
55. Knight, R. T. (1984). Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 9-20.
56. Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256-259.
57. Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1978). Variations in the latency of P300 as a function of variations in semantic categorizations. In D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research. Vol. EPA-600/9-77-043 (pp. 198-201). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99-116.
59. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
60. La Heij, W., & Vermeij, M. (1987). Reading versus naming: The effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 355-366.
61. Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1984). On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology, 21, 171-186.
62. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
63. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211, 77-80.
64. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
65. Möcks, J., & Verleger, R. (1991). Multivariate methods in biosignal analysis: Application of principal component analysis to event-related potentials. In R. Weitkunat (Ed.), Digital biosignal processing (pp. 399-458). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
66. Näätänen, R. (1982). Processing negativity: Evoked-potential reflection of selective attention-Review and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 605-640.
67. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
69. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
70. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Johnson, R., Jr., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
71. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G., & Macht, M. (1982). Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science, 218, 909-911.
73. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre-and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315-328.
74. Simons, R. F., Graham, F. K., Miles, M. A., & Chen, X. (2001). On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biological Psychology, 56, 207-218.
75. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1999). A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36, 409-414.
76. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38, 343-358.
77. Spencer, K. M., Goldstein. A., & Donchin, E. (1999). What is novel about "novel" stimuli? The effects of event probability on P300 and Novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 36, S111.
78. Spencer, K. M., Vila Abad, E., & Donchin, E. (2000). On the search for the neurophysiological manifestation of recollective experience. Psychophysiology, 37, 494-506.
79. Squires, K. C., Donchin, E., Herning, R. I., & McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 1-14.
80. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
81. Stanzione. P., Fattapposta. F., Giunti, P., D'Alessio, C., Tagliati, M., & Affricano, C., et al. (1991). P300 variations in Parkinsonian patients before and during dopaminergic monotherapy: A suggested dopamine component in P300. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 80, 446-453.
82. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
83. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
84. Sutton, S., & Ruchkin, D. S. (1984). The late positive complex: Advances and new problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 1-23.
85. Tecce, J. J. (1972). Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
86. Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
87. Theios, J., & Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review, 96, 5-24.
88. Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154-163.
89. Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2002). The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology, 39, 791-808.
90. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
91. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1994). Suspense and surprise: On the relationship between expectancies and P3. Psychophysiology, 31, 359-369.
92. Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under-and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354-365.
93. Woods, D. L., & Clayworth, C. C. (1987). Scalp topographies dissociate N1 and Nd components during auditory selective attention. In R. Johnson, J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.) Current trends in event-related potential research. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, supplement 40 (pp. 155-160). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
94. Yago, E., Escera, C., Alho, K., Giard, M. H., & Serra-Grabulosa, J. M. (2003). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 383-390.