Grammar teaching: Research, theory, and practice

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 507-522

  Ur, Penny ^a  

^a School for Gifted and Excellent Students   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866767736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Baron, N. S. (2005). Instant messaging and the future of language. Communications of the ACM, 48(7), 29-31
2. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited
3. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt
4. Brumfit C. J. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35(4), 595-608
6. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton
8. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. Crystal, D. (2001a). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Crystal, D. (2001b). Twenty-first century English. In A. Pulverness (Ed.), IATEFL 2001: Brighton conference selections (pp. 137-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Cullen, R., & Cho, I-Chun. (2007). Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 361-386
12. Dekeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practising second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Dekeyser, R. M. (2007). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. M. Dekeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14. Dekeyser, R. M., & Sokalski, K. J. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46(4), 613-642
15. Ding, Y. (2007). Text memorization and imitation: The practices of successful Chinese learners of English. System, 35(2), 271-280
16. Dongkwang, S., & Nation, P. (2007). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62(4), 339-348
17. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188
18. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3), 305-328
19. Ellis, R. (1993). Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? ELT Journal, 47(1), 3-11
20. Ellis, R. (2001a). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46
21. Ellis, R. (2001b). Grammar teaching-Practice or consciousness-raising?. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 167-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209-224
24. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107
25. Ellis, R., & Rathbone, M. (1987). The acquisition of German in a classroom context. London: Ealing College of Higher Education
26. Fitzpatrick, T., & Wray, A. (2006). Breaking up is not so hard to do: Individual differences in L2 memorization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 35-57
27. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 249-260
28. Gatbonton, E., & Segalovitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: a focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325-353
29. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
30. Jenkins, J. (2006). The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers. ELT Journal, 60(1), 42-50
31. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell
32. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon
33. Krashen, S. D. (1999). Seeking a role for grammar: A review of some recent studies. Foreign Language Annals, 32(2), 245-257
34. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach. Oxford: Pergamon
35. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 103-118). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
36. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle
37. Leow, R. P. (2007). Input in the L2 classroom: An attentional perspective on receptive practice. In R. M. Dekeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 21-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
38. Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249
39. Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700
40. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
41. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, volume II: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press
42. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56
43. Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage, talk and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228
44. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 31-65
46. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research in the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145
47. Nitta, R., & Gardner, S. (2005). Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT course books. ELT Journal, 59(1), 3-13
48. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, Supplement 1, 157-213
49. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
50. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214
51. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
52. Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 61-82
53. Richards, J. C. (2002). Accuracy and fluency revisited. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 35-50). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
54. Rivers, W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
55. Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(2), 422-451
56. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
57. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-322). Rowley, MA: Newbury House
58. Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based interaction. English Language Teaching Journal, 53(3), 149-156
59. Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209-239
60. Seidlhofer, B. (2006). English as a lingua franca in the expanding circle: What it isn't. In R. Rubdy & M. Saraceni (Eds.), English in the world: Global rules, global roles (pp. 40-50). London: Continuum
61. Shak, J., & Gardner, S. (2008). Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387-408
62. Skehan, P. (1997). A rationale for task-based instruction. In A cognitive approach to language learning (pp. 93-120). Oxford: Oxford University Press
63. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1-14
64. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
65. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-85
66. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1-22
67. Swain, M. (1995) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Oxford: Oxford University Press
68. Swain, M. (2000). French immersion research in Canada: Recent contributions to SLA and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 199-211
69. Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401
70. Taguchi, N. (2007). Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 433-457
71. Timmis, I. (2005). Towards a framework for teaching spoken grammar. English Language Teaching Journal, 59(2), 117-125
72. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
73. Ur, P. (2009). Grammar practice activities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
74. Ur, P., & Wright, A. (1991). Five minute activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
75. VanPatten, B. (2003). Processing instruction: An update. Modern Language Journal, 52(4), 755-803
76. Van Patten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243
77. VOICE (2009). Accessed January 11 from http://www.univie.ac.at/voice/index.php
78. Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press
79. Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Grammar, and nonsense, and learning. In Aspects of language teaching (pp. 79-98). Oxford: Oxford University Press
80. Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Collins
81. Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 52-62). Oxford: Heinemann
82. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489