Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 433-457

  Taguchi, Naoko ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36248983691     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168807080962     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S. 2000: Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H. and Demecheleer, M. 2006: Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10: 245-61.
3. Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S.K. 1992: Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. London: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. 2001: Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Bygate, M. 2001: Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate, M., Skeahn, P., and Swain, M., editors, Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, New York: Longman, 23-48.
6. Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. 2001: Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. New York: Longman.
7. Chi, M. 1997: Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences 6: 271-315.
8. Corder, S. 1973: Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
9. Crookes, G. 1989: Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 183-99.
10. Eggins, S. and Slade, D. 1997: Analyzing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
11. Ellis, N. 1996: Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 91-126.
12. Ellis, N. 1998: Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning 48: 631-64.
13. Ellis, N. 2001: Memory for language. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33-68.
14. Ellis, N. 2002: Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143-88.
15. Ellis, N. 2003: Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. and Long, M, editors, Handbook in SLA, Oxford: Blackwell, 63-103.
16. Ellis, N. 2005: SLA the associative-cognitive creed. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Applied Linguistics. Madison, Wisconsin.
17. Ellis, N. and Larsen-Freeman, D. 2006: Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics 27: 558-89.
18. Ellis, R. 1984: Formulaic speech in early classroom second language development. In Handscome, J., Orem, R. and Taylor, B, editors, On TESOL '83, Washington, DC: TESOL, 55-71.
19. Ellis, R. 1987: Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting and use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 1-20.
20. Ellis, R. 1994: The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Ellis, R. 1999: Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics 20: 460-80.
22. Foster, P. 2001: Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In Bygates, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M., editors, Reseaching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. New York: Longman, 75-93.
23. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. 1996: The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299-323.
24. Gatbonton, E. and Segalowitz, N. 1988: Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly 88:473-92.
25. Gatbonton, E. and Segalowitz, N. 1983: Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly 88: 473-92.
26. Gatbonton, E. and Segalowitz, N. 2005: Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modem Language Journal 61: 325-53.
27. Goffman, E. 1976: Replies and responses. Language in Society 5: 254-313.
28. Granger, S. 1998: Learner English on computer. London: Longman.
29. Hakuta, K. 1974: Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 287-98.
30. Howarth, P. 1998: Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19: 22-44.
31. Huang, J. and Hatch, E. 1978: A Chinese child's acquisition of English. In Hatch, E., editor, Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 118-31.
32. Hymes, H.D. 1974: Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
33. Kehe, D. and Kehe, P. 1994: Conversation strategies. Brattleboro, VM: Pro Lingua.
34. Krashen, S. and Scarcella, R. 1978: On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning 28: 283-300.
35. Levelt, W.J.M. 1989: Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Lewis, M. 1993: The lexical approach. The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
37. Littlewood, W. 1981: Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Littlewood, W. 1984: Foreign and second language learning: Language acquisition research and its implications for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Long, M. and Crookes, G. 1992: Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly 26: 55-98.
40. Makino, S. and Tsutsui, M. 2004: A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
41. Mehnert, U. 1998: The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 83-108.
42. Myles, R, Mitchell, R. and Hooper, J. 1999: Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 49-80.
43. Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. 1992: Lexical phrases and language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Ortega, L. 1999: Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 109-48.
45. Ortega, L. 2005: Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. Modern Language Journal 89: 317-27.
46. Paulston, C. 1971: Structural pattern drills: A classification. Foreign Language Annals 4: 187-93.
47. Pawley, A. and Syder, H. 1983: Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In Richards, J. and Schmidt, R., editors, Language and communication, London: Longman, 191-226.
48. Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. 2001: Approaches and methods in language teaching, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Robinson, P. 1995: Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning 45: 99-140.
50. Robinson, P. 2001: Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22: 27-57.
51. Schmitt, N. 2004: Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Sinclair, J. 1991: Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Skehan, P. 1996: A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics 17: 38-62.
54. Skehan, P. 1998: A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Skehan, P. 2001: Tasks and language performance assessment. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M., editors, Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, New York: Longman, 167-85.
56. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. 1997: The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research 1: 185-211.
57. Skehan, P. 1999: The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49: 93-120.
58. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. 2001: Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate, M., Skehan, R and Swain, M., editors, Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, New York: Longman, 99-118.
59. Taguchi, N. 2007: Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics 27: 113-135.
60. Taguchi, N. (in press): Building language blocks: Chunk learning and the development of complexity and fluency. Foreign Language.
61. Tannen, D. 1984: Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Tode, T. 2003: From unanalyzed chunks to rules: The learning of the English copula be by beginning Japanese learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics 41: 23-53.
63. Tomasello, M. 2000: First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 61-82.
64. Vihman, M. 1982: Formulas in first and second language acquisition. In Obler, L. and Menn, L., editors, Exceptional language and linguistics. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
65. Weinert, R. 1994: Some effects of a foreign language classroom on the development of German negation. Applied Linguistics 16: 180-205.
66. Weinert, R. 1995: Formulaic language in SLA: A review. Applied Linguistics 16: 180-205.
67. Wigglesworth, G. 1997: An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing 14: 85-106.
68. Wong-Fillmore, L. 1976: The second time around. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.
69. Wray, A. 2000: Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistic 21: 463-89.
70. Yuan, Y. and Ellis R. 2003: The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24: 1-27.