Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 980-993

  Polman, Evan ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice overload; Regulatory focus; Self other decision making

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CUSTODY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SATISFACTION; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL CONTROL; SOCIAL DISTANCE; UNITED STATES;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROXY; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SOCIAL DISTANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866601263     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026966     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
2. Anderson, L. K., Taylor, J. T., & Holloway, R. J. (1966). The consumer and his alternatives: An experimental approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 62-67. doi:10.2307/3149436
3. Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4. Beisswanger, A. H., Stone, E. R., Hupp, J. M., & Allgaier, L. (2003). Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 121-135. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_3
5. Casarett, D., & Ross, L. F. (1997). Overriding a patient's refusal of treatment after an iatrogenic complication. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1908-1910. doi:10.1056/NEJM199706263362611
6. Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 170-183. doi:10.1086/376808
7. Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.124
8. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791
9. Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142-179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752
10. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
11. Dholakia, U. M., Gopinath, M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Nataraajan, R. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in the experience and self-control of desire for temptations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 163-175. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_7
12. Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 312-322.
13. Eaton, B. C., & Lipsey, R. G. (1979). Comparison shopping and the clustering of homogeneous firms. Journal of Regional Science, 19, 421-435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1979.tb00610.x
14. Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling "holier than thou": Are selfserving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861-875. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
15. Faddegon, K., Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2008). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 880-895. doi:10.1002/ejsp.483
16. Fasolo, B., McClelland, G. H., & Todd, P. M. (2007). Escaping the tyranny of choice: When fewer attributes make choice easier. Marketing Theory, 7, 13-26. doi:10.1177/1470593107073842
17. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Wifall, T. (2007). Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 1-8.
18. Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
19. Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
20. Galinsky, A. D., Leonardelli, G. J., Okhuysen, G. A., & Mussweiler, T. (2005). Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: Promoting distributive and integrative success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1087-1098. doi:10.1177/0146167205276429
21. Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 147-158. doi:10.1086/209500
22. Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). "I" value freedom, but "we" value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162
23. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24, 382-395. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0109
24. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393-417. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351328
25. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215085
26. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
27. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
28. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
29. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27
30. Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
31. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J. Y., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515
32. Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-other discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45-53.
33. Hutchinson, J. M. C. (2005). Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biological Reviews, 80, 73-92. doi:10.1017/S1464793104006554
34. Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252-274. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1402
35. Iyengar, S. S., Huberman, G., & Jiang, W. (2004). How much choice is too much? Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In O. S. Mitchell & S. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance (pp. 83-95). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Iyengar, S. S., & Jiang, W. (2004). Choosing not to choose: The effect of more choices on retirement savings decisions. Unpublished manuscript.
37. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995-1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
38. Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the "best" job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143-150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x
39. Jonas, E., & Frey, D. (2003). Information search and presentation in advisor-client interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 154-168. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00059-1
40. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 977-990. doi:10.1177/0146167204274095
41. Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 519-533. doi:10.1086/380286
42. Koelemeijer, K., & Oppewal, H. (1999). Assessing the effects of assortment and ambience: A choice experimental approach. Journal of Retailing, 75, 319-345. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00011-1
43. Kray, L. J. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2903
44. Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2
45. Laran, J. (2010). Goal management in sequential choices: Consumer choices for others are more indulgent than personal choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 304-314. doi:10.1086/652193
46. Larsen, R. J. (1987). The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1195-1204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1195
47. Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1122-1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1122
48. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353-381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
50. McCauley, C., Kogan, N., & Teger, A. (1971). Order effects in answering risk dilemmas for self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 423-424. doi:10.1037/h0031938
51. Mick, D. G., Broniarczyk, S. M., & Haidt, J. (2004). Choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose: Emerging and prospective research on the deleterious effects of living in consumer hyperchoice. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 207-211. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000035906.74034.d4
52. Mogilner, C., Aaker, J. L., & Pennington, G. (2008). Time will tell: The distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 670-681. doi:10.1086/521901
53. Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers' perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 202-215. doi:10.1086/588698
54. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2
55. Pennington, G., & Roese, N. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563-576. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00058-1
56. Polman, E. (2010). Information distortion in self-other decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 432-435. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.003
57. Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492-501. doi:10.1177/0146167211398362
58. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
59. Redelmeier, D. A., & Tversky, A. (1990). The discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 1162-1164. doi:10.1056/NEJM199004193221620
60. Reibstein, D. J., Youngblood, S. A., & Fromkin, H. L. (1975). Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 434-437. doi:10.1037/h0076906
61. Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When "goods satiate." Psychology and Marketing, 26, 197-203. doi:10.1002/mar.20268
62. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2009). What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology and Marketing, 26, 229-253. doi:10.1002/mar.20271
63. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 409-425. doi:10.1086/651235
64. Schubert, T. W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity, 1, 353-376. doi:10.1080/152988602760328012
65. Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79-88. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79
66. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Ecco.
67. Sela, A., Berger, J., & Liu, W. (2009). Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 941-951. doi:10.1086/593692
68. Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.36
69. Shah, A. M., & Wolford, G. (2007). Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science, 18, 369-370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01906.x
70. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
71. Stone, E. R., Yates, A. J., & Caruthers, A. S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1797-1824. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00260.x
72. Teger, A. I., & Kogan, N. (1975). Decision-making for others under reciprocal and non-reciprocal conditions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 215-222. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1975.tb00174.x
73. Tordesillas, R., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Thinking too much? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 623-629.
74. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696169
75. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
76. Turner, J., Oakes, P., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463. doi:10.1177/0146167294205002
77. van Stekelenburg, J. (2006). Promoting or preventing social change: Instrumentality, identity, ideology and groups-based anger as motives of protest participation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
78. Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1964). Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 263-274. doi:10.1037/h0042190
79. Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331-339. doi:10.1177/0146167293193010
80. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181
81. Wray, L. D., & Stone, E. R. (2005). The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 125-144. doi:10.1002/bdm.490
82. Yates, F. J. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
83. Zaleska, M., & Kogan, N. (1971). Level of risk selected by individuals and groups when deciding for self and for others. Sociometry, 34, 198-213. doi:10.2307/2786410
84. Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93-106. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::AID-BDM311>3.0.CO;2-S
85. Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Sarr, B., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). A matter of perspective: Choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 618-622. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00410.x