Characterization of In Vivo Dlg1 Deletion on T Cell Development and Function

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Humphries, Lisa A ^a   Shaffer, Meredith H ^b   Sacirbegovic, Faruk ^c,d   Tomassian, Tamar ^a   McMahon, Kerrie Ann ^c,e   Humbert, Patrick O ^c,d   Silva, Oscar ^a   Round, June L ^a   Takamiya, Kogo ^f   Huganir, Richard L ^g   Burkhardt, Janis K ^b   Russell, Sarah M ^c,d,e   Miceli, M Carrie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MIYAZAKI   (Japan)

^g JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; CYTOKINE; DLG 1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CELL POLARITY; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DLG1 GENE; GENE; HELPER CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION; LYMPHOCYTE MEMBRANE; LYMPHOCYTE MIGRATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; T LYMPHOCYTE; TH1 CELL; TH2 CELL; UPREGULATION;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOKINES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GERM-LINE MUTATION; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TH1 CELLS; TH1-TH2 BALANCE; TH2 CELLS;

MUS;

EID: 84866488146     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045276     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Stinchcombe JC, Majorovits E, Bossi G, Fuller S, Griffiths GM, (2006) Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse. Nature 443: 462-465.
2. Thrasher AJ, Burns SO, (2010) WASP: a key immunological multitasker. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 182-192.
3. Ludford-Menting MJ, Oliaro J, Sacirbegovic F, Cheah ET, Pedersen N, et al. (2005) A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity 22: 737-748.
4. Burkhardt JK, Carrizosa E, Shaffer MH, (2008) The actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 26: 233-259.
5. Krummel MF, Macara I, (2006) Maintenance and modulation of T cell polarity. Nat Immunol 7: 1143-1149.
6. Grakoui A, (1999) The Immunological Synapse: A Molecular Machine Controlling T Cell Activation. Science 285: 221-227.
7. Cullinan P, Sperling AI, Burkhardt JK, (2002) The distal pole complex: a novel membrane domain distal to the immunological synapse. Immunol Rev 189: 111-122.
8. Fooksman DR, Vardhana S, Vasiliver-Shamis G, Liese J, Blair DA, et al. (2010) Functional anatomy of T cell activation and synapse formation. Annu Rev Immunol 28: 79-105.
9. Friedl P, den Boer AT, Gunzer M, (2005) Tuning immune responses: diversity and adaptation of the immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 532-545.
10. Huse M, Quann EJ, Davis MM, (2008) Shouts, whispers and the kiss of death: directional secretion in T cells. Nat Immunol 9(10): 1105-1111.
11. Chang JT, Ciocca ML, Kinjyo I, Palanivel VR, McClurkin CE, et al. (2011) Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity 34: 492-504.
12. Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I, Schambach F, Intlekofer AM, et al. (2007) Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 315: 1687-1691.
13. Allenspach EJ, Cullinan P, Tong J, Tang Q, Tesciuba AG, et al. (2001) ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. Immunity 15: 739-750.
14. Oliaro J, Van Ham V, Sacirbegovic F, Pasam A, Bomzon Z, et al. (2010) Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J Immunol 185: 367-375.
15. Maldonado RA, Irvine DJ, Schreiber R, Glimcher LH, (2004) A role for the immunological synapse in lineage commitment of CD4 lymphocytes. Nature 431: 527-532.
16. Dustin ML, Chan AC, (2000) Signaling takes shape in the immune system. Cell 103: 283-294.
17. Yeh JH, Sidhu SS, Chan AC, (2008) Regulation of a late phase of T cell polarity and effector functions by Crtam. Cell 132: 846-859.
18. Miceli MC, Moran M, Chung CD, Patel VP, Low T, et al. (2001) Co-stimulation and counter-stimulation: lipid raft clustering controls TCR signaling and functional outcomes. Semin Immunol 13: 115-128.
19. Russell S, (2008) How polarity shapes the destiny of T cells. J Cell Sci 121: 131-136.
20. Teixeiro E, Daniels MA, Hamilton SE, Schrum AG, Bragado R, et al. (2009) Different T cell receptor signals determine CD8+ memory versus effector development. Science 323: 502-505.
21. Humbert P, Russell S, Richardson H, (2003) Dlg, Scribble and Lgl in cell polarity, cell proliferation and cancer. Bioessays 25: 542-553.
22. Round JL, Tomassian T, Zhang M, Patel V, Schoenberger SP, et al. (2005) Dlgh1 coordinates actin polymerization, synaptic T cell receptor and lipid raft aggregation, and effector function in T cells. J Exp Med 201: 419-430.
23. Xavier R, Rabizadeh S, Ishiguro K, Andre N, Ortiz JB, et al. (2004) Discs large (Dlg1) complexes in lymphocyte activation. J Cell Biol 166: 173-178.
24. Round JL, Humphries LA, Tomassian T, Mittelstadt P, Zhang M, et al. (2007) Scaffold protein Dlgh1 coordinates alternative p38 kinase activation, directing T cell receptor signals toward NFAT but not NF-kappaB transcription factors. Nat Immunol 8: 154-161.
25. Lue RA, Brandin E, Chan EP, Branton D, (1996) Two independent domains of hDlg are sufficient for subcellular targeting: the PDZ1-2 conformational unit and an alternatively spliced domain. J Cell Biol 135: 1125-1137.
26. Lasserre R, Charrin S, Cuche C, Danckaert A, Thoulouze MI, et al. (2010) Ezrin tunes T-cell activation by controlling Dlg1 and microtubule positioning at the immunological synapse. Embo J 29: 2301-2314.
27. Salvador JM, Mittelstadt PR, Guszczynski T, Copeland TD, Yamaguchi H, et al. (2005) Alternative p38 activation pathway mediated by T cell receptor-proximal tyrosine kinases. Nat Immunol 6: 390-395.
28. Zanin-Zhorov A, Lin J, Scher J, Kumari S, Blair D, et al. (2012) Scaffold protein Disc large homolog 1 is required for T-cell receptor-induced activation of regulatory T-cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 1625-1630.
29. Mittelstadt PR, Yamaguchi H, Appella E, Ashwell JD, (2009) T cell receptor-mediated activation of p38{alpha} by mono-phosphorylation of the activation loop results in altered substrate specificity. J Biol Chem 284: 15469-15474.
30. Adachi K, Davis MM, (2011) T-cell receptor ligation induces distinct signaling pathways in naive vs. antigen-experienced T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 1549-1554.
31. Jirmanova L, Sarma DN, Jankovic D, Mittelstadt PR, Ashwell JD, (2009) Genetic disruption of p38alpha Tyr323 phosphorylation prevents T-cell receptor-mediated p38alpha activation and impairs interferon-gamma production. Blood 113: 2229-2237.
32. Morales-Tirado V, Johannson S, Hanson E, Howell A, Zhang J, et al. (2004) Cutting Edge: Selective Requirement for the Wiscott-Aldrich protein in cytokine, but not chemokine, secretion by CD4+ T cells. J Immunol 173(2): 726-730.
33. Shaffer MH, Dupree RS, Zhu P, Saotome I, Schmidt RF, et al. (2009) Ezrin and moesin function together to promote T cell activation. J Immunol 182: 1021-1032.
34. Cannon JL, Burkhardt JK, (2004) Differential roles for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein in immune synapse formation and IL-2 production. J Immunol 173: 1658-1662.
35. Affaticati P, Mignen O, Jambou F, Potier MC, Klingel-Schmitt I, et al. (2011) Sustained calcium signalling and caspase-3 activation involve NMDA receptors in thymocytes in contact with dendritic cells. Cell Death Differ 18: 99-108.
36. Stephenson LM, Sammut B, Graham DB, Chan-Wang J, Brim KL, et al. (2007) DLGH1 is a negative regulator of T-lymphocyte proliferation. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7574-7581.
37. Caruana G, Bernstein A, (2001) Craniofacial dysmorphogenesis including cleft palate in mice with an insertional mutation in the discs large gene. Mol Cell Biol 21(5): 1475-1483.
38. Zhou W, Zhang L, Guoxiang X, Mojsilovic-Petrovic J, Takamaya K, et al. (2008) GluR1 controls dendrite growth through its binding partner, SAP97. J Neurosci 28: 10220-10233.
39. Klocker N, Bunn RC, Schnell E, Caruana G, Bernstein A, et al. (2002) Synaptic glutamate receptor clustering in mice lacking the SH3 and GK domains of SAP97. Eur J Neurosci 16: 1517-1522.
40. Schlüter OM, Xu W, Malenka RC, (2006) Alternative N-terminal domains of PSD-95 and SAP97 govern activity-dependent regulation of synaptic AMPA receptor function. Neuron 51: 99-111.
41. Balamuth F, Leitenberg D, Unternaehrer J, Mellman I, Bottomly K, (2001) Distinct patterns of membrane microdomain partitioning in Th1 and th2 cells. Immunity 15: 729-738.
42. Madrenas J, (2003) A SLAT in the Th2 signalosome. Immunity 18: 459-461.
43. Josefowicz SZ, Rudensky A, (2009) Control of regulatory T cell lineage commitment and maintenance. Immunity 30: 616-625.
44. Wu Y, Borde M, Heissmeyer V, Feuerer M, Lapan AD, et al. (2006) FOXP3 controls regulatory T cell function through cooperation with NFAT. Cell 126: 375-387.
45. Nakagawa T, Futai K, Lashuel HA, Lo I, Okamoto K, et al. (2004) Quaternary structure, protein dynamics, and synaptic function of SAP97 controlled by L27 domain interactions. Neuron 44: 453-467.
46. Carrizosa E, Gomez TS, Labno CM, Klos Dehring DA, Liu X, et al. (2009) Hematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein 1 is recruited to the immunological synapse by IL-2-inducible T cell kinase and regulates phospholipase Cgamma1 microcluster dynamics during T cell spreading. J Immunol 183: 7352-7361.
47. Cannon JL, Labno CM, Bosco G, Seth A, McGavin MH, et al. (2001) Wasp recruitment to the T cell:APC contact site occurs independently of Cdc42 activation. Immunity 15: 249-259.