Undoing suggestive influence on memory: The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect

Cognition

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 141-159

  Oeberst, Aileen ^a   Blank, Hartmut ^b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eyewitness memory; Eyewitness testimony; Memory conversion; Memory impairment; Misinformation effect; Remembering

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SUGGESTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865790338     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Abeles P., Morton J. Avoiding misinformation: Reinstating target modality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52A:581-592.
2. Allen B.P., Lindsay D.S. Amalgamations of memories: Intrusion of information from one event into reports of another. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1998, 12:277-285.
3. Assefi S.L., Garry M. Absolut® memory distortions: Alcohol placebos influence the misinformation effect. Psychological Science 2003, 14:77-80.
4. Bahrick H.P. Semantic memory content in permastore - 50years of memory for Spanish learned in school. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113:1-29.
5. Bahrick H.P., Hall L.K., Berger S.A. Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades. Psychological Science 1996, 7:265-271.
6. Bartlett F.C. Psychology and primitive culture 1923, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Bartlett F.C. An experiment upon repeated reproduction. Journal of General Psychology 1928, 1:54-63.
8. Bekerian D.A., Bowers J.M. Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983, 9:139-145.
9. Belli R.F. Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:72-85.
10. Belli R.F., Lindsay D.S., Gales M.S., McCarthy T.T. Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:40-54.
11. Belli R.F., Loftus E.F. The pliability of autobiographical memory: Misinformation and the false memory problem. Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory 1996, 157-179. Cambridge University Press, New York. D.C. Rubin (Ed.).
12. Bjork R.A. Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium 1975, 114-123. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
13. Blank H. Memory states and memory tasks: An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory 1998, 6:481-529.
14. Blank H. Another look at retroactive and proactive interference: A quantitative analysis of conversion processes. Memory 2005, 13:200-224.
15. Blank H. Remembering: A theoretical interface between memory and social psychology. Social Psychology 2009, 40:164-175.
16. Blank H., Musch J., Pohl R.F. Hindsight bias: On being wise after the event. Social Cognition 2007, 25:1-9.
17. Blank H. Täuschung, Aufklärung und der Falschinformationseffekt in Zeugenaussagen-Experimenten [Deception, enlightenment, and the misinformation effect in eyewitness testimony experiments]. Die Beeinflussbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen 1994, 103-127. Elwert, Marburg. S.L. Sporer, D. Meurer (Eds.).
18. Bodner G.E., Musch E., Azad T. Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:1069-1076.
19. Bowers J.M., Bekerian D.A. When will postevent information distort eyewitness testimony?. Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:466-472.
20. Bregman N.J., McAllister H.A. Eyewitness testimony: The role of commitment in increasing reliability. Social Psychology Quarterly 1982, 45:181-184.
21. Brewer N., Burke A. Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior 2002, 26:353-364.
22. Brewer N., Keast A., Rishworth A. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2002, 8:44-56.
23. Brewer N., Wells G.L. Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011, 20:24-27.
24. Campbell J.M., Edwards M.S., Horswill M.S., Helman S. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: The misinformation effect reconsidered. British Journal of Psychology 2007, 98:485-498.
25. Ceci S.J., Loftus E.F., Leichtman M.D., Bruck M. The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994, 42:304-320.
26. Chambers K.L., Zaragoza M.S. Intended and unintended effects of explicit warnings on eyewitness suggestibility: Evidence from source identification tests. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29:1120-1129.
27. Christiaansen R.E., Ochalek K. Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and postevent information. Memory & Cognition 1983, 11:467-475.
28. Clifasefi S.L., Garry M., Harper D.N., Sharman S.J., Sutherland R. Psychotrophic placebos create resistance to the misinformation effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:112-117.
29. Cowley E., Janus E. Not necessarily better, but certainly different: A limit to the advertising misinformation effect on memory. Journal of Consumer Research 2004, 31:229-235.
30. Craik F.I., Tulving E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1975, 104:268-294.
31. Docherty, R. (2007). The stability and reversibility of the misinformation effect. Unpublished BSc (Hons) dissertation. University of Portsmouth.
32. Dodd D.H., Bradshaw J.M. Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1980, 19:695-704.
33. Dodson C., Reisberg D. Indirect testing of eyewitness memory: The (non)effect of misinformation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1991, 29:333-336.
34. Dunlap W.P., Cortina J.M., Vaslow J.B., Burke M.J. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:170-177.
35. Eakin D.K., Schreiber T.A., Sergent-Marshall S. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:813-825.
36. Echterhoff G., Groll S., Hirst W. Tainted truth: Overcorrection for misinformation influence on eyewitness memory. Social Cognition 2007, 25:367-409.
37. Echterhoff G., Hirst W., Hussy W. How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:770-782.
38. Endres, J. (1998). Wie suggestibel ist dieses Kind? überblick über bisherige experimentelle Arbeiten mit dem "Bonner Test für Aussagesuggestibilität" [How suggestible is this child? Overview of experimental work using the "Bonn Test of Statement Suggestibility" ]. Report Psychologie 23, 816-827.
39. Endres J., Poggenpohl C., Erben C. Repetitions, warnings and video: Cognitive and motivational components in preschool children's suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology 1999, 4:129-146.
40. English S.M., Nielson K.A. Reduction of the misinformation effect by arousal induced after learning. Cognition 2010, 117:237-242.
41. Erdelyi M.W. The empty set of hypermnesia. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994, 42:379-390.
42. Evans J.R., Fisher R. Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision, and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2011, 25:501-508.
43. Fischhoff B. Hindsight≠foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975, 1:288-299.
44. Forgas J.P., Laham S.M., Vargas P.T. Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:574-588.
45. Garcia-Bajos E., Migueles M. False memories for script actions in a mugging account. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2003, 15:195-208.
46. Gardiner J.M., Craik F.I., Bleasdale F.A. Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Memory & Cognition 1973, 1:213-216.
47. Garven S., Wood J.M., Malpass R.S., Shaw J.S. More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998, 83:347-359.
48. Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., Firstenberg I., Hutton L.A., Sullivan S.J., Avetissian I.V., et al. Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration 1984, 12:74-80.
49. Gibling F., Davies G. Reinstatement of context following exposure to post-event information. British Journal of Psychology 1988, 79:129-141.
50. Goldsmith M., Koriat A. The strategic regulation of memory accuracy and informativeness. Memory use as skilled cognition 2007, Vol. 48:1-60. Elsevier, San Diego, CA. A. Benjamin, B. Ross (Eds.).
51. Goldsmith M., Koriat A., Weinberg-Eliezer A. Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:73-95.
52. Greene E. Judge's instruction on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1988, 18:252-276.
53. Greene E., Flynn M.S., Loftus E.F. Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1982, 21:207-219.
54. Grice H.P. Logic of conversation. Syntax and semantics. Speech acts 1975, Vol. 3:41-58. Academic Press, New York.
55. Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row (Original work published in 1950).
56. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press (Original work published in 1925).
57. Harris C.B., Paterson H.M., Kemp R.I. Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?. Memory 2008, 16:213-230.
58. Hicks, G. (2008). Can the misinformation effect be reversed in eyewitness testimony using warnings? Unpublished BSc (Hons) dissertation. University of Portsmouth.
59. Higham P.A. Believing details known to have been suggested. British Journal of Psychology 1998, 89:265-283.
60. Higham P.A. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:1-22.
61. Higham, P. A., Luna, K., & Blank, H. (submitted for publication). An ironic effect of post-warnings on the susceptibility to misinformation. University of Southampton.
62. Higham P.A., Luna K., Bloomfield J. Trace-strength and source-monitoring accounts of accuracy and metacognitive resolution in the misinformation paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2011, 25:324-335.
63. Highhouse S., Bottrill K.V. The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 62:220-229.
64. Hirst W., Echterhoff G. Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology 2012, 63:55-79.
65. Hirst W., Manier D. Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory 2008, 16:183-200.
66. Huffman M.L., Crossman A.M., Ceci S.J. "Are false memories permanent?": An investigation of the long-term effects of source misattributions. Consciousness and Cognition 1997, 6:482-490.
67. Jaschinski U., Wentura D. Misleading postevent information and working memory capacity: An individual differences approach to eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2002, 16:223-231.
68. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
69. Kebbell M.R., Giles D.C. Some experimental influences of lawyers' complicated questions on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 2000, 134:129-139.
70. Kleider H.M., Pezdek K., Goldinger S.D., Kirk A. Schema-driven source misattribution errors: Remembering the expected from a witnessed event. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:1-20.
71. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:297-315.
72. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 1996, 103:490-517.
73. Koriat A., Goldsmith M., Pansky A. Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology 2000, 51:481-537.
74. Kroll N.E.A., Ogawa K.H., Nieters J.E. Eyewitness memory and the importance of sequential in formation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1988, 26:339-395.
75. Kroll N.E.A., Timourian D.A. Misleading questions and the retrieval of the irretrievable. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1986, 24:165-168.
76. Lee K., Bussey K. The effects of misleading and inconsistent postevent information on children's recollections of criterion-learned information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1999, 73:161-182.
77. Lewin K. A dynamic theory of personality 1935, McGraw-Hill, New York.
78. Lindsay D.S. Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:1077-1083.
79. Lindsay D.S., Allen B.P., Chan J.C.K., Dahl L.C. Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: Intrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:96-111.
80. Lindsay D.S., Hagen L., Read J.D., Wade K.A., Garry M. True photographs and false memories. Psychological Science 2004, 15:149-154.
81. Lindsay D.S., Johnson M.K. The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition 1989, 17:349-358.
82. Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Cognitive psychology of memory 2008, 325-348. Elsevier, Oxford. H.L. Roediger (Ed.).
83. Loftus E.F. Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:560-572.
84. Loftus E.F. Eyewitness testimony 1979, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
85. Loftus E.F. Reactions to blatantly contradictory information. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:368-374.
86. Loftus E.F. Made in memory: Distortions of recollection after misleading information. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1991, 187-215. Academic Press, New York. G. Bower (Ed.).
87. Loftus E.F. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory 2005, 12:361-366.
88. Loftus E.F., Loftus G.R. On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist 1980, 35:409-420.
89. Loftus E.F., Miller D.G., Burns H.J. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1978, 4:19-31.
90. Loftus E.F., Pickrell J.E. The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals 1995, 25:720-725.
91. Luna, K., & Martín-Luengo, B. (2012). Improving accuracy in the presence of misinformation with the plurality option. Applied Cognitive Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2845.
92. Marche T.A., Howe M.L. Preschoolers report misinformation despite accurate memory. Developmental Psychology 1995, 31:554-567.
93. Mazzoni G., Scoboria A., Harvey L. Nonbelieved memories. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1334-1340.
94. McCloskey M., Zaragoza M. Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1985, 114:1-16.
95. Meade M.L., Roediger H.L. Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:995-1009.
96. Morton J., Hammersley R.H., Bekerian D.A. Headed records: A model for memory and its failures. Cognition 1985, 20:1-23.
97. Multhaup K.S., de Leonardis D.M., Johnson M.K. Source memory and eyewitness suggestibility in older adults. Journal of General Psychology 1999, 126:74-84.
98. Orne M.T. The use and misuse of hypnosis in court. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1979, 27:311-341.
99. Pansky A., Tenenboim E., Bar S.K. The misinformation effect revisited: Interactions between spontaneous memory processes and misleading suggestions. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:270-287.
100. Parker S., Garry M., Engle R.W., Harper D.N., Clifasefi S.L. Psychotropic placebos reduce the misinformation effect by increasing monitoring at test. Memory 2008, 16:410-419.
101. Paterson H.M., Kemp R.I. Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime & Law 2006, 12:181-191.
102. Payne D.G., Toglia M.P., Anastasi J.S. Recognition performance level and the magnitude of the misinformation effect in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:376-382.
103. Pérez-Mata N., Diges M. False recollections and the congruence of suggested information. Memory 2007, 15:701-717.
104. Perfect T.J., Wagstaff G.F., Moore D., Andrews B., Cleveland V., Newcombe S., et al. How can we help witnesses to remember more? It's an (eyes) open and shut case. Law and Human Behavior 2008, 32:312-324.
105. Pezdek K., Roe C. Memory for childhood events - How suggestible is it?. Consciousness and Cognition 1994, 3:374-387.
106. Pickrell J.E., Bernstein D.M., Loftus E.F. The misinformation effect. Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment and memory 2004, 345-361. Psychology Press, HOVE, UK & NY. R.F. Pohl (Ed.).
107. Pohl R.F., Schumacher S., Friedrich M. The eyewitness-misinformation effect: Distorted recollections based on contradictory information. The cognitive psychology of knowledge 1993, 33-52. Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam/New York. G. Strube, F. Wender (Eds.).
108. Postman L., Stark K. Role of response availability in transfer and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 79:168-177.
109. Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
110. Scoboria A., Mazzoni G., Kirsch I., Relyea M. Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004, 18:791-807.
111. Sedlmeier P., Jaeger S. The impact of post-event information on study-related memories: An exploration of the roles of judgemental anchoring, specific expectations about change, and motivational influences. Memory 2007, 15:70-92.
112. Seifert C.M. The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective?. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 2002, 41:265-292.
113. Semon, R. (1904). Die Mneme als erhaltendes Prinzip im Wechsel des organischen Geschehens. Leipzig: Engelmann [English translation: Semon, R. (1921). The mneme. London: Allen and Unwin].
114. Smith V.L., Ellsworth P.C. The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology 1987, 72:294-300.
115. Snyder M., Uranowitz S.W. Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36:941-950.
116. Spanos N.P., Gwynn M.I., Comer S.L., Baltruweit W.J., de Groh M. Are hypnotically induced pseudomemories resistant to cross-examination?. Law and Human Behavior 1989, 13:271-289.
117. Steffens M.C., Mecklenbräuker S. False memories: Phenomena, theories, and implications. Journal of Psychology 2007, 215:12-24.
118. Szpitalak M., Polczyk R. Warning against warnings: Alerted subjects may perform worse. Misinformation, involvement and warning as determinants of witness testimony. Polish Psychological Bulletin 2010, 41:105-112.
119. Szpitalak M., Polczyk R. Can warning harm memory? The impact of warning on eyewitness memory. Problems of Forensic Sciences 2011, 86:140-150.
120. Tousignant J.P., Hall D., Loftus E.F. Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:329-338.
121. Tulving E. Cue-dependent forgetting. American Scientist 1974, 62:74-82.
122. Tulving E. Elements of episodic memory 1983, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
123. Tulving E., Bower G.H. The logic of memory representations. The psychology of learning and motivation 1974, Vol. 8:265-301. Academic Press, New York.
124. Vornik L.A., Sharman S.J., Garry M. The power of the spoken word: Sociolinguistic cues influence the misinformation effect. Memory 2003, 11:101-109.
125. Wagstaff G.F., Cole J., Wheatcroft J., Anderton A., Madden H. Reducing and reversing pseudomemories with hypnosis. Contemporary Hypnosis 2008, 25:178-191.
126. Walther E., Blank H. Entscheidungsprozesse im Falschinformationsparadigma: Die Rolle von Unsicherheit, Metakognition und sozialem Einfluss [Decision processes in the misinformation paradigm: The role of uncertainty, metacognition, and social influence]. Psychologische Rundschau 2004, 55:72-81.
127. Watkins M.J. Engrams as cuegrams and forgetting as cue overload: A cueing approach to the structure of memory. Memory organization and structure 1979, 347-372. Academic Press, New York. R.C. Puff (Ed.).
128. Webert D.R. Are the courts in a trance? Approaches to the admissibility of hypnotically enhanced witness testimony in light of empirical evidence. American Criminal Law Review 2003, 40:1301-1327.
129. Weingardt K.R., Toland H.K., Loftus E.F. Reports of suggested memories: Do people truly believe them?. Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments 1994, 3-26. Cambridge University Press, New York. M.P. Toglia (Ed.).
130. Weldon M.S. Remembering as a social process. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2001, 40:67-120.
131. Wells G.L., Memon A., Penrod S.D. Eyewitness Evidence. Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:45-75.
132. Wienholt, H. (1995). Der Einfluss einer zusätzlichen Information auf die Erinnerung an ein visuelles Ereignis [The impact of additional information upon memory of a visual event]. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Konstanz.
133. Winkelspecht S.M., Mowrer R.R. Memory distortion: Can accurate memory be preserved?. Psychological Record 1999, 49:137-144.
134. Wright D.B. Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: A new testing procedure to differentiate explanations. Memory 1993, 1:153-166.
135. Wright D.B., Varley S., Belton A. Accurate second guesses in misinformation studies. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1996, 10:13-21.
136. Wynn V.E., Logie R.H. The veracity of long-term memories - Did Bartlett get it right?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1998, 12:1-20.
137. Zaragoza M.S., Belli R.S., Payment K.E. Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom 2006, 35-63. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Garry, H. Hayne (Eds.).
138. Zaragoza M.S., Koshmider J.W. Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:246-255.
139. Zaragoza M.S., Lane S.M. Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:934-945.
140. Zaragoza M.S., McCloskey M., Jamis M. Misleading postevent information and recall of the original event: Further evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987, 13:36-44.