Another look at retroactive and proactive interference: A quantitative analysis of conversion processes

Memory

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 200-224

  Blank, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TEST; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; WITNESS;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTIVE INHIBITION;

EID: 14044274317     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09608210344000698     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abra, J. C. (1972). List differentiation and forgetting. In C. P. Duncan, L. Sechrest, & A. W. Melton (Eds.), Human memory: Festschrift in honor of Benton J. Underwood (pp. 25-57). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2. Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.
3. Anderson, R. C., & Watts, G. H. (1971). Response competition in the forgetting of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 29-34.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
5. Banks, W. P. (1970). Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 81-99.
6. Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). "Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105.
7. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial process models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
8. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
9. Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1990). Spoken and written recall of visual narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 175-187.
10. Bernbach, H. A. (1967). Decision processes in memory. Psychological Review, 74, 462-480.
11. Blank, H. (1997). Wie kann der Einfluss falscher Zusatzinformationen in Zeugenbefragungen minimiert werden? - Experimentelle Hinweise [How can the influence of misleading post-event information be minimized in eyewitness interrogations? - Hints from experimentation]. In L. Greuel, T. Fabian, & M. Stadler (Eds.), Psychologie der Zeugenaussage [The psychology of eyewitness testimony]. Weinheim: Beltz/PVU.
12. Blank, H. (1998). Memory states and memory tasks: An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory, 6, 481-529.
13. Blank, H. (2002). The role of horizontal categorisation in retroactive and proactive interference. Experimental Psychology, 49 196-207.
14. Bower, G. H., Thompson-Schill, S., & Tulving, E. (1994). Reducing retroactive interference: An interference analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 51-66.
15. Britt, S. H. (1935). Retroactive inhibition: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 32, 381-440.
16. Chandler, C. C. (1993). Accessing related events increases retroactive interference in a matching recognition test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 967-974.
17. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
18. Echterhoff, G. (2001). Communicative aspects of remembering: Conversational assumptions and the malleability of memory. (Doctoral Dissertation, New School University, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(7B), 3871.
19. Edwards, D., & Middleton, D. (1986). Text for memory: Joint recall with a scribe. Human Learning, 5, 125-138.
20. Endres, J., Poggenpohl, C., & Erben, C. (1999). Repetitions, warnings and video: Cognitive and motivational components in preschool children's suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 129-146.
21. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental .Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
22. Greeno, J. G., James, C. T., & DaPolito, F. J. (1971). A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 331-345.
23. Heine, R. (1914). Über Wiedererkennen und rückwirkende Hemmung [On recognition and retroactive inhibition]. Zeitschrifi für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 68, 161-236.
24. Highhouse, S., & Bottrill, K. V. (1995). The influence of social (mis)information on memory for behavior in an employment interview. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62 220-229.
25. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
26. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-315.
27. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
28. Loftus, E. F. (1991). Made in memory: Distortions in recollection after misleading information. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 187-215). New York: Academic Press.
29. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
30. McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
31. McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse. Psychological Review, 39, 352-370.
32. Mélen, M. (1989). L'effet de la présentation d'une information nouvelle erronée: une synthèse des travaux récents [The effect of novel, misleading information: A review of recent studies]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 9-29.
33. Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.
34. Niemi, P. (1979). A note on "blocking" as a retrieval interference phenomenon. American Journal of Psyhology, 92, 547-550.
35. Pohl, R. F., Schumacher, S., & Friedrich, M. (1993). The eyewitness-misinformation effect: Distorted recollections based on contradictory information. In G. Strube & K. F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge (pp. 33-52). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.
36. Postman, L., & Stark, K. (1969). Role of response availability in transfer and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 168-177.
37. Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
38. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
39. Schneider, D. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3 481-485.
40. Schuurmans, E., & Vandierendonck, A. (1985). Recall as communication: Effects of frame anticipation. Psychological Research, 47, 119-124.
41. Sporer, S. L., & aus dem Kahmen, A. (1994). Irreführung von Zeugen durch Falschinformationen: Empirische Befunde zur Beeinflussbarkeit von Aussagen [Misleading eyewitnesses through false information: Empirical findings on the suggestibility of testimony]. In S. L. Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflußbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen [The suggestibility of eyewitness testimony] (pp. 58-81). Marburg: Elwert.
42. Strack, F., & Bless, H. (1994). Memory for non-occurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 203-217.
43. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Walther, E., Bless, H., Strack, F., Rackstraw, P., Wagner, D., & Werth, L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 793-810.
45. Watkins, M. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328-335.
46. Wickelgren, W. (1976). Memory storage dyamics. In W.K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning processes (Vol. 4). Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
47. Wickelgren, W. A., & Norman, D. A. (1966). Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 316-347.
48. Wienholt, H. (1995). Der Einfluss einer zusätzlichen Information auf die Erinnerung an ein visuelles Ereignis [The influence of additional information on memory for a visual event]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Constance, Germany.
49. Winograd, E. (1968). List differentiation as a function of frequency and retention interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76 (Monograph Supplement), 1-18.
50. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.