Memory States and Memory Tasks: An Integrative Framework for Eyewitness Memory and Suggestibility

Memory

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 481-529

  Blank, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIME; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SUGGESTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRIME; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SUGGESTION;

EID: 0032152543     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741943086     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barnes, J.M., & Underwood, B.J. (1959). "Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105.
2. Bekerian, D.A., & Bowers, J.M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 139-145.
3. Bekerian, D.A., & Dennett, J.L. (1990). Spoken and written recall of visual narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 175-187.
4. Belli, R.F., Lindsay, D.S., Gales, M.S., & McCarthy, T.T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory and Cognition. 22, 40-54.
5. Belli, R.F., Windschitl, P.D., McCarthy, T.T., & Winfrey, S.E. (1992). Detecting memory impairment with a modified test procedure: Manipulating retention interval with centrally presented event items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition. 18, 356-367.
6. Blank. H. (1994). Täuschung, Aufklärung und der Falschinformationseffekt in Zeugenaussagen-Experimenten [Deception, enlightenment, and the misinformation effect in eyewitness testimony experiments]. In S.L. Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflußbarkeit von 'Zeugenaussagen [The suggestibility of eyewitness testimony] (pp. 103-127). Marburg: Elwert.
7. Blank, H. (1966). Remembering discrepant information in eyewitness testimony experiments and paired-associate learning tasks: An integrative model. Doctoral dissertation. Marburg: Tectum. [Also available via internet: http://www.uni-konstanz.de/ZE./Bib/diss/b/blank-0.html]
8. Bowers, J.M., & Bekerian, D.A. (1984). When will post-event information distort eyewitness testimony? Journal of Applied Psychology. 69, 466-472.
9. Ceci, S.J., Loftus, E.F., Leichtman, M.D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304-320.
10. Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F., & Toglia, M.P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 38-49.
11. Chandler, C.C. (1989). Specific retroactive interference in modified recognition tests: Evidence for an unknown cause of interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 256-265.
12. Chandler, C.C (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events: Interference in modified recognition tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 17, 115-125.
13. Chandler, C.C. (1993). Accessing related events increases retroactive interference in a matching recognition test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 967-974.
14. Christiaansen, R.E., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Hditing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 11, 467-475.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Crowder, R.G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
17. Davis, J., & Schiffman, H.R. (1985). The influence of the wording of interrogatives on the accuracy of eyewitness recollections. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 23, 394-396.
18. Dodd, D.H., & Bradshaw, J.M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 695-704.
19. Edwards, D., & Middleton, D.(1986a). Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse. Discourse Protesses. 9, 423-459.
20. Edwards, D., & Middleton, D. (1986b). Text for memory: Joint recall with a scribe. Human Learning, 5, 125-138.
21. Förster, J. (1994). Kann man Zeugen vor Gedächtnisverfälsehungen warnen? [Is it possible to warn witnesses against memory distortions?] In S.L Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflussbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen [The suggestibility of eyewitness testimony] (pp. 82-102). Marburg: Elwert.
22. Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Cohen, G., Holland, H.L., & Surtes, L. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 31-39.
23. Greeno, J.G., James, C.T., & DaPolito, K.J. (1971). A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 331-345.
24. Greenwald, A.G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
25. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp.41-58). New York: Academic Press.
26. Hays, W.L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt. Rinehart & Winston.
27. Hell, W. (1993). Gedächtnistäuschungen [Memory illusions]. In W. Hell, K. Fiedler, & G. Gigerenzer (Eds.), Kognitive Täuschungen [Cognitive illusions] (pp.13-38). Heidelberg, Berlin, Oxford: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
28. Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The "conjunction fallacy" revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Higgins, E.T., & Stangor, C. (1988). A "change-of-standard"" perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 181-192.
30. Hilton, D.J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248-271.
31. Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wcsley.
32. Holtgraves, T., Srull, T.K., & Socall. D. (1989). Conversation memory: The effects of speaker status on memory for the assertiveness of conversation remarks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 149-160.
33. Hyman, I.E. Jr., Husband, T.H., & Billings, J.F. (1995). False memories of childhood experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 181-197.
34. Kallio, K.D., & Cutler, B.L. (1987). Does lexical marking affect eyewitness recall? Journal of Psychology, 121, 249-258.
35. Kroll, N.E.A., Ogawa, K.H., & Nieters, J.E. (1988). Eyewitness memory and the importance of sequential information. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 26, 395-398.
36. Kroll, N.F.A., & Timourian, D.A. (1986). Misleading questions and the retrieval of the irretrievable. Bulletin of the Psychonomic society, 24, 165-168.
37. Lindsay, D.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
38. Lipscomb, T.J., McAllister, H.A., & Bregman, N.J. (1985). Bias in eyewitness accounts: The effects of question format, delay interval, and stimulus presentation. Journal of Psychology, 119, 207-212.
39. Loftus, E.F. (1979a). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Loftus, F.F. (1979b). Reactions to blatantly contradictory information. Memory & Cognition. 7, 368-374.
41. Loftus, E.F. (1991). Made in memory: Distortions in recollection after misleading information. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 25 (pp. 187-215). New York: Academic Press.
42. Loftus, E.F., & Huffman, H.G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100-104.
43. Loftus, E.F., & Loftus, G.R. (1980). On ihe permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.
44. Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
45. Loftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., & Wagenaar, W.A. (1985). The fate of memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 375-380.
46. Loftus, E.F., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86-88.
47. Martin, E. (1971). Verbal learning theory and independent retrieval phenomena. Psychological Review, 78, 314-332.
48. Mayring, P. (1988). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Foundations and teehniques]. Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag.
49. McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
50. Mélen, M. (1989). L'effet de la présentation d'une information nouvelle erronée: une synthèse des travaux récents [The effect of the presentation of novel, misleading information: A review of reeent studies]. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 9-29.
51. Metcalfe, J. (1990). Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 145-160.
52. Moston, S. (1990). How children interpret and respond to questions: Situational sources of suggestibility in eyewitness interviews. Social Behaviour, 5, 155-167.
53. Neisser, U. (1994). Self-narratives: True and false. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative, (pp.1-18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Norman, D.A. (1970). Comments on the information structure of memory. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention and performance III (pp. 293-303). Amsterdam: North Holland.
55. Pohl, R.F., Schumacher, S., & Friedrich, M. (1993). The eyewitness-misinformation effect: Distorted recollections based on contradictory information. In G. Strube & K.F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge (pp.33-52), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
56. Postman, L., & Stark, K. (1969). Role of response availability in transfer and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 168-177.
57. Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
58. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341-357.
59. Ryan, R.H., & Geiselman, R.E. (1991). Effects of biased information on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 29, 79.
60. Schooler, J.W., & Tanaka, J.W. (1991). Composites, compromises, and CHARM: What is the evidence for blend memory representations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 96-100.
61. Schuurmans, E., & Vandierendonck, A. (1985). Recall as communication: Effects of frame anticipation. Psychological Research, 47, 119-124.
62. Smith. V.L., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 294-300.
63. Sporer, S.T., & aus dem Kahmen, A. (1994). Irreführung von Zeugen durch Falsehinformationen: Empirische Befunde zur Beeinflußbarkeit von Aussagen [Misleading eyewitnesses through false information: Empirical findings to the suggestibility of testimony]. In S.L. Sporer & D. Meurer (Eds.), Die Beeinflußbarkeit von Zeugenaussagen [The suggestibility of eyewitness testimony] (pp. 58-81). Marburg: Elwert.
64. Tousignant, J.P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 14, 329-338.
65. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
66. Wagenaar, W.A., & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Ten cases of eyewitness identification: Logical and procedural problems. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 291-319.
67. Yuille, J.C., & Cutshall, J.L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.
68. Zaragoza, M., & Koshmider, J.W. III. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 246-255.
69. Zaragoza, M.S., & Lane, S.M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934-945.