Repetitions, warnings and video: Cognitive and motivational components in preschool children's suggestibility

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 129-146

  Endres, Johann ^a   Poggenpohl, Claudia ^a   Erben, Christina ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ERROR; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEMORY; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SUGGESTION; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 0033056201     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532599167725     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ackil, J. K. & Zaragoza, M. S. (1995). Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source. Journal of Expérimenta! Child Psychology, 60, 57-83.
2. Asendorpf, J. (1989). Soziale Gehemmtheit und ihre Entwicklung [Social inhibition and its development]. Berlin: Springer.
3. Binet, A. (1900). La Siifgestibilite. Paris: Schleicher Frères.
4. Cardone, D. & Dent, H. (1996). Memory and interrogative suggestibility: The effects of modality of information presentation and retrieval conditions upon the suggestibility scores of people with learning disabilities. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 165-178.
5. Cattell, R. B. (1966). Handbook for the Culture Fair Intelligence Test, Scale 1. Champaign, IL: IPAT.
6. Ceci, S. J. & Brück, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
7. Ceci, S. J. & Brück, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Danielsdottir, G., Sigurgeirsdottir, S., Einarsdottir, H. R. & Haraldson, E. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility in children and its relationship with memory and vocabulary. Persona/sty and Individual Differences, 14, 499-502.
9. Davies, G. & Westcott, H. (1992). Videotechnology and the child witness. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds), Children as mtnesses, pp. 211-229. Chichester: Wiley.
10. Endres, J. (1997). The psychology of the child witness: The role of individual differences and their assessment. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 1, 44-69.
11. Endres, J., Scholz, O. B. & Summa, D. (1997). Aussagesuggestibilität bei Kindern-Vorstellung eines neuen diagnostischen Verfahrens und erste Ergebnisse [The suggestibility of children's statements: Presentation of a new assessment tool and first results]. In L. Greuel, T. Fabian & M. Stadier (Eds), Psychologie der Zeugenaussage [Psychology of witness testimony], pp. 189-204. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
12. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303-314.
13. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psycholog, 26, 215-221.
14. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: Wiley.
15. Hell, W., Gigerenzer, G., Gauggel, S., Mall, M. & Müller, M. (1988). Hindsight bias: An interaction of automatic and motivational factors? Memory anil Cognition, 16, 533-538.
16. Howie, P. M. & Dowd, H. J. (1996). Self-esteem and the perceived obligation to respond: Effects on children's testimony. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 197-209.
17. Hyman, I. E. & Billings, F. J. (in press). Individual differences and false memories. Memory.
18. Lindsay, D. S., Gonzales, V. & Eso, K. (1995). Aware and unaware uses of memories of postevent suggestions. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds), Memory and testimony in the child witness, pp. 86-108. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Marxsen, D., Yuille, J. C. & Nisbet, M. (1995). The complexities of eliciting and assessing children's statements. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 450-460.
20. McCloskey, M. & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
21. McGough, L. S. (1994). Child witnesses: Fragile voices in the American legal system. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22. Memon, A., Holley, A., Wark, L., Bull, R. & Köhnken, G. (1996). Reducing suggestibility in child witness interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 503-518.
23. Memon, A. & Vartoukian, R. (1996). The effects of repeated questioning on young children's eyewitness testimony. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 403-415.
24. Milne, R., Bull, R., Koehnken, G. & Memon, A. (1995). The cognitive interview and suggestibility. In N. K. Clark & G. M. Stephenson (Eds), Criminal behaviour Perceptions, attributions and rationality, pp. 21-27. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, No. 22. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
25. Pezdek, K. & Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 116-128.
26. Poole, D. A. & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975-986.
27. Saywitz, K. J. & Snyder, L. (1996). Narrative elaboration: Test of a new procedure for interviewing children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1347-1357.
28. Schacter, D. L., Kagan, J. & Leichtman, M. D. (1995). True and false memories in children and adults: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychology, Public Policy, and Lan1, 1, 411-428.
29. Steller, M. & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence, pp. 217-245. Berlin: Springer.
30. Volbert, R. & Pieters, V. (1996). Suggestive Beeinflussungen von Kinderaussagen [The suggestibility of children's statements]. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 183-198.
31. Warren, A., Hulse-Trotter, K. & Tubbs, E. C. (1991). Inducing resistance to suggestibility in children. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 273-285.
32. Warren, A. R. & McGough, L. S. (1996). Research on children's suggestibility: Implications for the investigative interview. In B. L. Bottoms & G. S. Goodman (Eds), International perspectives on child abuse and children's testimony, pp. 12-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.