Literacies for learning: A multiple source comprehension illustration

Developmental Cognitive Science Goes to School

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 30-44

  Goldman, Susan R ^a   Ozuru, Yasuhiro ^b   Braasch, Jason L G ^a   Manning, Flori H ^a   Lawless, Kimberly A ^a   Gomez, Kimberley W ^c   Slanovits, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865663755     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Alvermann D. E. (2001). Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 676-690.
2. Bazerman, C. (1998). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 13, 11-15.
4. Berkencotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, Inc. pp. 209-233.
7. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator. Online. Available at: http://www.aft.org/pubsreports/american_educator/spring2003/chall.html (accessed January 17, 2009).
9. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
11. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
12. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of new literacies. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
13. Coté, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think-aloud protocols. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. pp. 169-193.
14. Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1-53.
15. de León, A. G., & Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2002). The urban high school's challenge: Ensuring literacy for every child. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
16. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
17. Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Process, 23, 357-398.
18. Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. M. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing. pp. 313-347.
19. Goldman, S. R., & Bisanz, G. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. pp. 19-50.
20. Goldman, S. R., & Bloome, D. M. (2005). Learning to construct and integrate. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications: Festschrift in honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. pp. 169-182.
21. Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, Jr., J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: LEA. pp. 311-335.
22. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., Braasch, J. L. G., MacLeod, S., & Manning, F. (2010). Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources. In M. G. McKeown and L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life. New York: Guilford. pp. 257-284.
23. Gomez, L., & Gomez, K. (2007). Reading for learning: Literacy supports for 21st century work. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 224-228.
24. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan. pp. 15-41.
25. Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Aloa, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343-366.
26. Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 455-505.
27. Hartman, D. K. (1993). Intertextuality and reading: The text, the reader, the author and the context. Linguistics in Education, 4, 295-311.
28. Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuh, J., & Hubbard, B. (2005). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 141-176.
29. International Adult Literacy Survey (1997). Highlights from the second report of the international adult literacy survey: Literacy skills for the knowledge society. Online. Available at: http://www.nald.ca/nls/ials/introduc.htm (accessed August 15, 2002).
30. Janick-Buckner, D. (1997). Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 29-32.
31. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Middle school students' initial attempts at inquiry in project-based science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 7, 313-350.
32. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lawless, K. A., & Schrader, P. G. (2008). Where do we go now? Understanding research on navigation in complex digital environments. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of new literacies. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. pp 267-296.
35. Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2006). Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy. Report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
36. Lee, P. J., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history. New York: New York University Press. pp. 199-222.
37. Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science. London: Routledge. pp. 87-113.
38. Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) (2008). Learning with animation: Research implications for design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. McNamara, D. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1-30.
40. Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 251-283.
41. Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. (2005). Teaching to promote the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level. In S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. pp. 421-474.
42. Manning, F. H., Goldman, S. R., Ozuru, Y., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K., & Braasch, J. L. G. (2008). Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, & F. J. Prins (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2008, (Vol. 2) Utrecht: International Conference of the Learning Sciences (www.isls.org). pp. 19-26.). Printed proceedings printed and distributed by: Lulu (www.lulu.com).
43. Meltzer, J., Smith, N. C., & Clark, H. (2002). Adolescent literacy resources: Linking research and practice. Providence: Brown University, Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory.
44. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective, 1, 3-67.
45. Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent Literacy, 52, 96-107.
46. Moje, E. B., & O'Brien, D. G. (Eds.) (2001). Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
47. New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
48. Orr, L. (1986). Intertextuality and the cultural text in recent semiotics. College English, 48(8). 811-823.
49. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
50. Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research based best practices. New York: Guilford. pp. 11-27.
51. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493.
52. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-16.
53. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 6-10.
54. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40-59.
55. Snow, C., & Biancarosa, G. (Eds.) (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
56. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75, 125-157.
57. Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89, 879-900.
58. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch Jr. & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. pp. 353-373.
59. VanSledright, B. (2002a). In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
60. VanSledright, B. (2002b). Confronting history's interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 1089-1115.
61. Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
62. Wineburg, S. (Eds.) (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
63. Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relationships between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 467-502.
64. Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 190-195.