Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text

Handbook of Reading Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 311-336

  Goldman, Susan R ^a   Rakestraw, John A ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071558229     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (184)

1. Afflerbach, P. (1986). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' importance assignment processes. In J. A Niles (Ed.), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers (pp. 30-40). Chicago: National Reading Conference
2. Alexander, P. A, & Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in the processing of text. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 89-121
3. Alexander, P. A, Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201-252
4. Alverman, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 951-983). New York: Longman
5. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 193--226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
6. Anderson, R. c., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A, & Wilkinson, L. A G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education
7. Armbruster, B. B. (1984). The problem of "inconsiderate text." In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 202-217). New York: Longman
8. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346
9. Armbruster, B. B., & Gudbrandsen, B. (1986). Reading comprehension instruction in social studies programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 36-48
10. Asher, N. (1993). Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer
11. Bartlett, B. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of classroom text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe
12. Bateman, J. A, & Rondhuis, J. K. (1997). Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes, 24, 3-49
13. Baumann, J. F. (1986). Effect of rewritten content textbook passages on middle grade students' comprehension of main ideas: Making the inconsiderate considerate. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 1-21
14. Beck, I. L., & Dole, J. A (1992). Reading and thinking with history and science text. In C. Collins & J. M. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agendafor the twenty-first century (pp. 1-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
15. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1989). Expository text for young readers: The issue of coherence. In i. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honoro/Robert Glaser (pp. 47--66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
16. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Gromoll, E. W. (1989). Learning from social studies. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99-158
17. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251-276
18. Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 19, 385-406
19. Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem-solving. Poetics, 9, 223--250
20. Bond, S. J., & Hayes, J. R (1984). Cues people use to paragraph text. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 147-168
21. Britton, B. K, & Graesser, A C. (Eds.). (1996). Models of text comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
22. Britton, B. K, & Giilgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345
23. Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of text structure-Effects on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1-20
24. Chambliss, M. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778-807
25. Chen, C. & Rada, R (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125-156
26. Cirilo, R K (1981). Referential coherence and test structure in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 358-367
27. Cirilo, R K, & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96-109
28. Cote, N., Goldman, S. R, & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1-53
29. Danner, F. W. (1976). Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174--183
30. Davison, A (1984). Readability formulas and comprehension. In G. G. Duffy, L. R Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 128--144). New York: Longman
31. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 431-468
32. Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65--74
33. Flood, J., Heath, S. B., & Flood, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan
34. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307
35. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: The psychology of reading (Vol. XII, pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
36. Garner, R (1992). Learning from school texts. Educational Psychologist, 27, 53--63
37. Garner, R, Alexander, P., Slater, W., Hare, V. c., Smith, T., & Reis, R (1986). Children's knowledge of structural properties of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 411-416
38. Gernsbacher, M. A (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
39. Gernsbacher, M. A (1995). The structure building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K Britton & A C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of text understanding (pp. 289-311). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
40. Gernsbacher, M. A (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304
41. Gernsbacher, M. A, & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression-A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245--262
42. Gernsbacher, M. A, & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717
43. Givon, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5-55
44. Glover, J. A, Dinnel, D. L., Halpain, D. R, McKee, T. K, Corkill, A H., & Wise, S. L. (1988). Effects of across-chapter signals on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 3-15
45. Glynn, S. M., Birtton, B. K, & Tillman, M. H. (1985). Typographic cues in text: Management of the reader's attention. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text (Vol. 2, pp. 192-209). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
46. Golding, J. M., & Fowler, S. B. (1992). The limited facilitative effect of typographical signals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 99-113
47. Goldman, S. R (1988, November). Strategies for understanding information organization in discourse. Paper presented at the PsychonomiCS Society Convention, Chicago
48. Goldman, S. R (1996). Reading, writing, and learning in hypermedia environments. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 7-42). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
49. Goldman, S. R (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Process, 23, 357-398
50. Goldman, S. R, Cote, N. c., & Saul, E. U. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 273-305
51. Goldman, S. R, & Duran, R P. (1988). Answering questions from oceanography texts: Learner, task and text characteristics. Discourse Processes, 11, 373-412
52. Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-Ianguage speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 504-519
53. Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1990). Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 181-219
54. Goldman, S. R., & Van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Conclusions, conundrums and challenges for the future. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 367-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
55. Goldman, S. R., & Varma, S. (1995). CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
56. Goldman, S. R., Varma, S., & Cote, N. (1996). Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: Toward "smarter" and flexible models of text comprehension. In B. K Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of text comprehension (pp.73-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
57. Goldman, S. R., & Varnhagen, C. K (1983). Comprehension of stories with no-obstacle and obstacle endings. Child Development, 54, 980-992
58. Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag
59. Graesser, A. c., & Clark, L. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge (pp. 245-295). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
60. Graesser, A. c., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1997). Cognition. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 1, pp. 292-319). London: Sage
61. Graesser, A. c., Millis, K K, & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189
62. Graesser, A. c., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395
63. Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178-199
64. Haberlandt, K (1980). Story grammar and reading time of story constituent. Poetics, 9, 99-118
65. Haberlandt, K (1984). Components of sentence and word reading times. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 219-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
66. Haberlandt, K, Berian, c., & Sandson, J. (1980). The episode schema in story processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 635-650
67. Haenggi, D., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Bolliger, C. M. (1993). Individual differences in situation-based inferencing during narrative text comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension: Advances in discourse processing (pp. 79-96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
68. Hague, S. (1988, December). Awareness of text structure: The question of transfer from L1 to L2. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Tucson, AZ
69. Halliday, M. A. K, & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman
70. Hare, V. c., & Chesla, L. G. (1986). When main idea identification fails. In J. A. Niles & R. V. Lalik (Eds.), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers (pp 316-325). Chicago: National Reading Conference
71. Hoover, M. i. (1997). Effects of texhlal and cohesive structure on discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 23, 193-220
72. Hyona, J. (1990). Text structure, repetition and eye movements. In O. Dahl & K Fraurud (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine (pp. 45-55). Stockholm: University of Stockholm
73. Hyona, J. (1994). Processing of topic shifts by adults and children. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 77-90
74. Hyona, J. (1995). An eye movement analysis of topic-shift effect during repeated reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1365-1373
75. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301-333
76. Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based instruction, 20, 1-8
77. Kamil, M. L., (1998, December). A taxonomy of hypertext links. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX
78. Kamil, M. L., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy? An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & Kieffer, R. (Eds.), Handbook ofliteracy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
79. Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13-28
80. Kieras, D. E. (1980). Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages. Memory and Cognition, 8, 345-353
81. Kieras, D. E. (1981). The role of major referents and sentence topics in the construction of passage macrostructure. Discourse Processes, 4, 1-15
82. Kieras, D. E. (1982). A model of reader strategy for abstracting main ideas from simple technical prose. Text, 2(1-3), 47-81
83. Kieras, D. (1985). Thematic processes in the comprehension of technical prose. In B. K Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 89-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
84. Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 161-195
85. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182
86. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press
87. Kintsch, W., & Greene, E. ( 1978). The role of culture specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes, 1, 1-15
88. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, S, 257-274
89. Kintsch, w., Mandel, T. S., & Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, S, 547-552
90. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394
91. Landauer, T. K, & Dumais, S. T. (1996). How come you know so much? From practical problems to new memory theory. In. D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Vol. i. Theory in context (pp. 105-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
92. Landauer, T. K, & Dumais, S. T. (1997, April). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240
93. Landauer, T. K, Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Latent semantic analysis: An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284
94. Landauer, T. K, Laham, D., Rehder, B., & Schreiner, M. E. (1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412-417). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
95. Langston, M., & Trabasso, T. (1999). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
96. Lascarides, A, & Asher, N. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 55-63). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics
97. Lehrer, R (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
98. Lehto, M. R, Zhu, W., & Carpenter, B. (1995). The relative effectiveness of hypertext and text. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 293-313
99. Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402-412
100. Lorch, R E, Jr. (1985). Effects on recall of signals to text organization. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 374-376
101. Lorch, R E, Jr. (1989). Text Signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational psychology review, 1, 209-234
102. Lorch, R E, Jr. (1995). Integration of topicinformation during reading. In R E Lorch, Jr. & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 279-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
103. Lorch, R E, & Chen, A H. (1986). Effects of number signals on reading and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 263-270
104. Lorch, R E, & Lorch, E. P. (1986). On-line processing of summary and importance signals in reading. Discourse Processes, 9, 489-496
105. Lorch, E. P., Lorch, R E, Jr., Gretter, M. L., & Horn, D. G. (1987). On-line processing of topic structure by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 81-95
106. Lorch, R E, Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 281-290
107. Lorch, R E, Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 350-362
108. Lorch, R E, Jr., Lorch, E. P., & Mogan, A M. (1987). Task effects and individual differences in on-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Discourse Processes, 10, 63-80
109. Lorch, R E, & O'Brien, E. J. (Eds.). (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
110. Lund, K, & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 203-208
111. Mandler, J. M., & DeForest, M. (1979). Is there more than one way to recall a story? Child Development, 50, 886-889
112. Mandler, J. M., & Goodman, M. S. (1982). On the psychological validity of story structure. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 507-523
113. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. J. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151
114. Mann, W. c., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281
115. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115
116. Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: Systems and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins
117. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19
118. Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L., & Cook, L. K (1984). Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pre training and signaling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1089-1105
119. McGee, L. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children's recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581-590
120. McHoul, A., & Roe, P. (1996). Hypertext and reading cognition. In G. E. Stelmach & P. A. Vroon (Series Eds.) & B. Gorayska &J. L. Mey (Eds.), Advances in psychology. Cognitive technology: In search ofa humane interface (Vol. 113, pp. 347-359). New York: Elsevier
121. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288
122. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43
123. Meyer, B. J. E (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland
124. Meyer, B. J. E (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K Britton & J. B. Back (Eds.). Understanding expository text (pp. 11-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
125. Meyer, B. J. E, Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103
126. Meyer, B. J. E, & McConkie, G. W. (1973). What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 109-117
127. Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157
128. Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (1992). Readers' knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373-391
129. O'Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
130. Ohtsuka, K, & Brewer, W. E (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative texts. Discourse Processes, 15, 317-336
131. Olhausen, M. M., & Roller, C. M. (1988). The operation of text structure and content schemata in isolation and in interaction. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 70-88
132. Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 815-860). New York: Longman
133. Perfetti, C. A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: Tools and theories in language research. Discourse Processes, 25, 363-377
134. Perfetti, C. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1975). Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 257-272
135. Rada, R., & Murphy, C. (1992). Searching versus browsing in hypertext. Hypermedia, 4, 1-30
136. Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, M. B. w., Laham, D., Landa uer, T. K, & Kintsch, W. (1998). Using latent semantic analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes, 25, 337-354
137. Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L. D., & Kieffer, R. (Eds.). (1988). Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
138. Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects in recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177-196
139. Richgels, D. L., & McGee, L. M. (1989). Instruction in awareness of causation and compare/contrast text structure. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: Thirty-eighth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 301-309). Chicago: National Reading Conference
140. Rickards, J. P., Fayen, B. R., Sullivan, J. E, & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, note taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517
141. Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K A. (1996). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467
142. Roller, C. M. (1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 78-89
143. Rouet, J., Levonen, J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. (Eds.). (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
144. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press
145. Samuels, S. J., Tennyson, S. P., Mulcahy, N., L., Schermer, N., & Hajovy, H. (1988). Adults' use of text structure in the recall of a scientific journal article. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 171-174
146. Sanders, T. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24, 119-147
147. Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1-35
148. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37-68
149. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, c., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentiona I learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, S, 51-68
150. Shapiro, A M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 1-36
151. Slater, W. H., Graves, M. E, & Piche, G. L. (1985). Effects of structural organizers on ninth-grade students' comprehension and recall of four patterns of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 189-202
152. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. E (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290
153. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. L., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31 (5), 24-33
154. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 85-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
155. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
156. Spooren, W. (1997). The processing of underspecified coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 24, 149-168
157. Stark, H. A. (1988). What do paragraph markings do? Discourse Processes, 11, 275-303
158. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. E (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing: Vol. 2. Advances in discourse processes (pp. 53-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
159. Stein, N. L., & Nezworski, T. (1978). The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory. Discourse Processes, 1, 177-193
160. Stein, N. L., & Policastro, M. (1984). The concept of a story: A comparison between children's and teachers' viewpoints. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp.113-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
161. Taylor, B. M., & Samuels, S. J. (1983). Children's use of text structure in the recall of expository material. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 517-528
162. Taylor, M. B., & Williams, J. P. (1983). Comprehension of learning-disabled readers: Task and text variations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 743-751
163. Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110
164. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
165. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630
166. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K. Britton & A C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
167. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
168. van Dijk, T. A, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press
169. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1986). Markeren van kerngedee/ten in studieteksten: Een proces-produkt benadering [Cueing key phrases in instructional texts: A process-product approach]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger
170. van Oostendorp, H., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.). (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
171. van Oostendorp, H., & de Mul, S. (Eds.). (1996). Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
172. Vauras, M., Hyona, J., & Niemi, P. (1992). Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(1), 39-54
173. Vauras, M., von Wright, J., & Kinnunen, R (1991). Learning of differently structured expository texts. In M. Vauras (Ed.), Text learning strategies in school-aged students. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 59. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica
174. Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L. N. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 45-68
175. Waller, R (1991). Typography and discourse. In R Barr, M. i. Karnil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 341-380). New York: Longman
176. Weaver, C. A. III, & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R Barr, M. i. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 230-243). New York: Longman
177. Weisberg, R, & Balajthy, E. (1989). Transfer effects of instructing poor readers to recognize expository text structure. In S. McCormick & J. Zuteil (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: Thirty-eighth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 279-285). Chicago: National Reading Conference
178. Wenger, M. J., & Payne, D. G. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 93-130
179. Yochum, N. (1991). Children's learning from informational text: The relationship between prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 87-108
180. Zwaan, R A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196-1207
181. Zwaan, R A., Langston, M. c., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297
182. Zwaan, R A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 386-397
183. Zwaan, R A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185
184. Zwaan, R A., & Whitten, S. N. (1998). Effects of temporal markers and discourse order on situation model construction. Manuscript submitted for publication