Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 251-283

  Magliano, Joseph P ^a   Millis, Keith K ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042762258     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_02     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Brown, J. I., Fischo, V. V., & Hanna, G. S. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago: Riverside.
2. Carver, R. P. (1992). What do standardized tests of reading comprehension measure in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and rate? Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 346-359.
3. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, R., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
4. Coté, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendor & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
6. Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 209-226.
7. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with laten semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
8. Freedle R., & Kostin, I. (1994). Can multiple-choice reading tests be construct valid? Psychological Sciences, 5, 107-110.
9. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Sciences, 4, 294-298.
10. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
11. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R, & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430-445.
12. Glover, J. A., Zimmer, J. W., & Bruning, R. H. (1979). Utility of the Nelson-Denny as a predictor of structure and themanticity in memory for prose. Psychological Reports, 45, 44-46.
13. Goldman, S. R., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1986). Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 401-418.
14. Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
16. Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., & the TRG (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 129-148.
17. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Mawhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Hanna, G. S., & Oaster, T. R. (1980). Studies of the seriousness of three threats to passage dependence. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 40, 405-411.
19. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103-128.
20. Katz, S., Lautenschlager, G., Blackburn, A., & Harris, F. (1990). Answering reading comprehension items without passages on the SAT. Psychological Sciences, 1, 122-127.
21. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
22. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
23. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham D. (1998). An introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
24. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., Rehder, B., & Schreiner, M. E. (1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and humans. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412-417). Mawhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Langston, M. C., & Trabasso, T. (1999). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In S. R. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Long, D. L., Seely, M. R., & Oppy, B. J. (1999). The strategic nature of less skilled readers' suppression problems. Discourse Processes, 27, 281-302.
27. Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293-310.
28. Mackie, J. L. (1980). The cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon.
29. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processes during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
30. Magliano, J. P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K. K., Muñoz, B. D., & McNamara, D. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 181-188.
31. Malak, J., & Hegeman, J. N. (1985). Using verbal SAT scores to predict Nelson-Denny scores for reading placement. Journal of Reading, 28, 301-304.
32. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Millis, K., King, A., & Kim, J. (2001). Situation operators and reprocessing descriptive text. Discourse Processes, 30, 201-236.
34. Oakhill, J. (1994). Individual differences in children's text comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 821-848). New York: Academic.
35. Olson, G. M., Duffy, S. A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in the study of immediate processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 38, 771-777.
37. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849-894). New York: Academic.
39. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
41. Steele, C. M. (1998). Stereotyping and its threat are real. American Psychologist. 53, 680-681.
42. Steele, C. M., Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
43. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-301.
44. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996a). Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-288.
45. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: A right of all children (pp. 160-188). New York: Columbia University Press.
46. Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
47. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding Text: Achieving explanatory coherence through online inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
48. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
49. Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in the representation of stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1-25.
50. van den Bergh, H. (1990). On the construct validity of multiple-choice items for reading comprehension. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 1-12.
51. van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative text: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). New York: Academic.
52. van den Broek, P., & Lorch, R. F. (1993). Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: Evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Processes, 16, 75-98.
53. van den Broek, P., Rohleder, L., & Narvaez, D. (1996). Causal inferences and the comprehension of literary text. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 201-220). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences. Discourse Processes, 14, 133-145.
55. Zwaan, R. A. & Brown, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289-328.