Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 2, 2008, Pages 19-26

  Manning, Flori H ^a   Goldman, Susan R ^a   Ozuru, Yasuhiro ^a   Lawless, Kimberly A ^a   Gomez, Kimberley ^a   Braasch, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHICAGO; DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION; MULTIPLE SOURCE; RESPONSE STRATEGIES; TWO SOURCES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880448204     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bain, R. B. (2005). "They thought the world was flat?" Applying principles of How People Learn in teaching high school history. In S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 179-213). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Garcia-Arista, E., Campanario, J. M., & Otero, J. (1996) Influence of subject-matter setting on comprehension monitoring. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 427-441.
3. Golder, C., & Rouet, J.-F. (2000). Comprendre un text heterogene: Modele de situation ou modele d'argument? [Comprehension of heterogeneous text: Situation model or argument model?] Psychologie Francaise, 45, 253-260.
4. Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Ferris & D. M. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 313-347). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
5. Goldman, S. R. and Bloome, D. M. (2004). Learning to Construct and Integrate. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental Cognitive Psychology and its Applications: Festshrift in Honor of Lyle Bourne, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas Landauer (169-182). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
6. Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K., Bertenthal, M., Braasch, J., MacLeod, S., Manning, F. H., Fujimoto, K., & Manderino, M. (2007, April). Assessing Multiple - Source Digital Literacy Skills. Paper presented at the symposium "21st-Century Literacy: A Symposium in Honor of Michael Pressley." American Educational Research Association Chicago, IL.
7. Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: understanding history. In S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 31-78). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Levstick, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (1997). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Mannes, S. (1994). Strategic processing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 577-588.
10. Nash, J. G., Schumacher, G. M., & Carlson, B. W. (1993). Writing from sources: A structure-mapping model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 159-170.
11. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Committee on How People Learn, a targeted report for teachers, M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford, Editors. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press.
12. Paxton, R. J. (1997). "Someone with like a life wrote it": The effects of a visible author on high school history students. Journal of Educational Pscyhology, 89, 235-250.
13. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Pilotte, W.J., & Gable, R.K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603-610.
15. Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Rouet, J.-F, Favar, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
17. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522.
18. VanSledright, B. A. (2002a). Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment. Elementary School Journal, 103(2), 131-160.
19. VanSledright, B. (2002b). Confronting History's Interpretive Paradox While Teaching Fifth Graders to Investigate the Past. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 1089 - 1115.
20. VanSledright, B.A. (2004). What does it mean to read history?: Fertile ground for cross-disciplinary collaborations? Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 342-346.
21. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311.
22. Wineburg, S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.). Teaching and learing in history (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relationships between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning. Cognition & Instruction, 23(4), 467-502.