Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of Web 2.0 practices in higher education

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 781-797

  Ching, Yu Hui ^a   Hsu, Yu Chang ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053109448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.931     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT. A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
2. Bell, P. & Winn, W. (2000). Distributed cognitions, by nature and by design. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 123-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
4. Ching, Y.-H. & Hsu, Y.-C. (2010). Blogging in higher education: Issues, challenges, and design considerations. Proceedings of Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) Annual International Convention, Anaheim, California. October 27-30, 2010.
5. Dohn, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 343-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9066-8
6. Ellison, N. & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99-122. http://www.editlib.org/p/24310
7. Farmer, B., Yue, A. & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 123-136. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/farmer.html
8. Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K. & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting "Learning by design" activities using group blogs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 199-212. http://www.ifets.info/journals/11_4/15.pdf
9. Gray, K., Thompson, C., Sheard, J., Clerehan, R. & Hamilton, M. (2010). Students as Web 2.0 authors: Implications for assessment design and conduct. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 105-122. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/gray.html
10. Greeno, J. G. & the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Projects Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003066X02008687
11. Griesbaum, J. & Gortz, M. (2010). Using feedback to enhance collaborative learning: an exploratory study concerning the added value of self- and peer-assessment by first-year students in a blended learning lecture. International Journal on E-learning, 9(4), 481-503. http://www.editlib.org/p/32313
12. Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M. & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980802588626
13. Hsu, Y.-C., Ching, Y.-H. & Grabowski, B. (2009). The spirit of educational Web 2.0 literacy: Cognitive tools of the new media age for K-12. In W. H. L. Tan & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 353-371). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
14. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A. & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 38(1), 59-88. [verified 14 Aug 2011] http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/fss/2010-0115-200338/Representational%20Guidance%20METIS.pdf
15. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Cooperation and the use of technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 401-423). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1342-1352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.005
17. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2
18. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40(4), 377-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
21. McConnell, D. (1999). Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 232-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.153097.x
22. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/mcloughlin.html
23. Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. [verified 14 Aug 2011] http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/ theorycmaps/theoryunderlyingconceptmaps.htm
24. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. [verified 14 Aug 2011] http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228
25. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and design for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-86). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C. & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional designer competencies: The standards. Syracuse, NY: ERIC.
27. Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F. & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421-449. [verified 14 Aug 2011] http://www.florencemartin.net/site08/research/MultimediaCompetencies.pdf
28. Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
29. Tudge, J. R. H. & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 207-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erbaum.
30. Vratulis, V. & Dobson, T. M. (2008). Social negotiations in a Wiki environment: A case study with pre-service teachers. Educational Media International, 45(4), 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980802571531
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Wassell, B. & Crouch, C. (2008). Fostering connections between multicultural education and technology: Incorporating weblogs into preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 211-232. http://www.editlib.org/p/22907
33. Xie, Y., Ke, F. & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001