CT analysis of leg alignment after free-hand and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Preliminary results of a controlled, prospective, randomised study;CT-analyse der beinachse nach konventioneller vs. navigierter knieendoprothese. Erste ergebnisse einer kontrollierten, prospektiven und randomisierten studie

Unfallchirurg

Volumn 106, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 941-948

  Oberst, M ^a,c   Bertsch, C ^a   Wurstlin S ^b   Holz, U ^a  

^a Katharinenhospital   (Germany)

^b Radiologisches Institut   (Germany)

^c KATHARINENHOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Axis; CAS; Navigation; Rotation; TKA

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMUR; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINESIOLOGY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; AGED; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BONE MALFORMATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 0345688727     PISSN: 01775537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 173: 178-183
2. Clemens U, Miehlke RK, Kohler Set al. (2003) Computerassisitierte Navigation mit dem OrthoPilot-System und der Search-Evolution-Knieendoprothese. Ergebnisse einer Multicenter-Studie. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (Hrsg) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk-und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 207-216
3. Coull R, Bankes MJK, Rossouw DJ (1990) Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. Knee 6: 235-237
4. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott R, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248: 13-14
5. Janecek M, Bucek B, Hart R (2001) OrthoPilot (Aesculap) - Computernavigation der Endoprothese des Kniegelenks. Acta Chir Austriaca 33: 175
6. Jeffrey RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignement after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73 B: 709-714
7. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparative Appar Mot 87/7: 645-652
8. Kienapfel H, Springorum HP, Ziegler A et al.(2001) Der Einfluss der Femur- und Tibiakomponentenrotation auf das patellofemorale Versagen beim künstlichen Kniegelenkersatz. Orthopäde 32/4: 312-318
9. Konermann W, Saur MA (2003) Postoperatives Alignment von konventionell und navigiert implantierten Knietotalendoprothesen. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (Hrsg) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 189-198
10. Krugmann J (2003), Firma BrainLAB, persönliche Mitteilung
11. Lampe F, Honl M, Wieman R, Hille E (1999) Computergestützte Navigation Gelenkerhalt und Endoprothetik bei Gonarthrose. In: Implant 2 - 1999, Kasuistik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio
12. Mahoney FL, Barthel DW (1965) Activities of daily living. Md State Med J 14/2: 61-65
13. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S (2001) Navigation in der Kniendoprothetik - Vorläufige klinische Erfahrungen und prospektiv vergleichbare Studie gegenüber konventioneller Implantationstechnik. Z Orthop 139: 109-116
14. Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367: 39-42
15. Olcott CW, Scott RD (2000) Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthoplasty. Am J Knee Surg 13/3: 166-168
16. Olcott CW, Scott RD (2000) A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15/1: 22-26
17. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Grifka J (2003) Knieendoprothesen-navigation mit dem CT-freien VectorVision-System. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (Hrsg.) Navigation und Robotic in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, 5 245-249
18. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232: 168-173
19. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignement of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299: 153-156
20. Saragaglia D, Picard F (2003) Computergestützte Implantation von Knietotalendoprothesen ohne präoperative bildgebende Verfahren: Das kinematische Modell. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (Hrsg) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk-und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 199-206
21. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C (2001) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: Comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomised study. Rev Chir Orthop Repatrice Appar Mot 87/1: 18-28
22. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibial-femoral alignement and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint 5urg 67 B: 551-556
23. Waidelich HA, Strecker W, Schneider E (1992) Computertomographische Torsionswinkel- und Längenmessung an der unteren Extremität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 157/3: 245-251